Muslim dawagandist Jalal Abualrub in a book written to castigate the Shia raises certain arguments, which actually prove that, according to the inspired New Testament writings, Jesus claimed to be God Almighty in the flesh (even though he is not the Father or the Holy Spirit).

Note, for instance what Jalal states in respect to the words which the Shia attribute to Ali:

ETERNAL IMAMS?

Ali Ibn Abu Talib, the Prophet’s paternal cousin and son-in-law, as well as, the other claimed Shi’a Imams, existed with Allah from the beginning, so the Shi’as claim. For instance, they claim that Ali said, “I am the first, and the last, and the upper-most and the inner-most, and I am the inheritor of the earth” (Al-Kash-shi. Rijal Al-Kash-shi, Pg., 138).  

Therefore, according to Shi’a creed, Ali left nothing much that is uniquely for Allah, the Exalted, the All-Mighty, Who says this about Himself in the Quran, {He is the First (nothing is before Him) and the Last (nothing is after Him), the Most-High (nothing is above Him) and the Most-Near (nothing is nearer than Him)} (57:3). (Abualrub, The Jewish Temple Rebuilt by the Shia, edited by Alaa Mencke [Madinah Publishers and Distributors, Third Edition 2021], p. 18)

Hence, according to Jalal himself statements where someone describes himself as the First and the Last or as the Inheritor of the earth are akin to claiming to be God Almighty.

Now let us see what Jesus Christ said of about his own Person:

“Behold, he cometh with clouds; and every eye shall see him, and they also which pierced him: and all kindreds of the earth shall wail because of him. Even so, Amen. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty… And when I saw him, I fell at his feet as dead. And he laid his right hand upon me, saying unto me, Fear not; I am the first and the last: I am he that liveth, and was dead; and, behold, I am alive for evermore, Amen; and have the keys of hell and of death. Revelation 1:7-8, 17-18

“And unto the angel of the church in Smyrna write; These things saith the first and the last, which was dead, and is alive;” Revelation 2:8

“And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last… I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star… He which testifieth these things saith, Surely I come quickly. Amen. Even so, come, Lord Jesus. The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you all.” Revelation 22:12-13, 16, 20-21

The risen Jesus identifies himself as the First and the Last, the Alpha and Omega and the Beginning and the End, as well as the Almighty, all of which are titles that depict Christ as the uncreated and ever-living Son of God!

In these next verses, Jesus claims to be the uniquely beloved and glorious Son of God who is the Heir that own owns everything that belongs to the Father, being the One to whom the Father has entrusted all creation so as to reign over it:

“And he began to speak unto them by parables. A certain man planted a vineyard, and set an hedge about it, and digged a place for the winefat, and built a tower, and let it out to husbandmen, and went into a far country… Having yet therefore ONE son, his well-beloved, he sent him also last unto them, saying, They will reverence MY son. But those husbandmen said among themselves, This is THE HEIR; come, let us kill him, and the inheritance shall be ours. And they took him, and killed him, and cast him out of the vineyard.” Mark 12:1, 6-8

“And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth.” Matthew 28:18

“All things are delivered to me of my Father: and no man knoweth who the Son is, but the Father; and who the Father is, but the Son, and he to whom the Son will reveal him.” Luke 10:22

“He shall glorify me: for he shall receive of mine, and shall shew it unto you. All things that the Father hath are mine: therefore said I, that he shall take of mine, and shall shew it unto you.” John 16:14-15

“These words spake Jesus, and lifted up his eyes to heaven, and said, Father, the hour is come; glorify THY SON, that THY SON also may glorify thee: as thou hast given him power over all flesh, that he should give eternal life to as many as thou hast given him… And all mine are thine, and thine are mine; and I am glorified in them.” John 17:1-2, 10

Therefore, as Jalal himself acknowledges, these are the very characteristics and functions that no creature can ascribe to his or herself since that would blasphemous idolatry.

As such, this proves that the real Christ of history did not claim to be a servant of Allah. Rather, the true Jesus explicitly testified to his Spirit-fille servants that he is indeed the Almighty and eternal Son of God who is coequal to the Father in essence, power, honor and glory.

All scriptural references taken from Authorized Version (AV) of the Holy Bible.

FURTHER READING

A Collection of Responses to one Muslim crusader’s tirade against Christianity answers to Abualrub’s series “Between ‘Shubbiha Lahum’ and Trinity”.

The Mutability of Allah

Exposing Islam’s Pentagonity

Modalism, Polytheism or just plain old Quackerism! — Another Response to Jalal Abualrub’s Foolishness and Blasphemies

The True Confession of Faith Pt. 1

The True Confession of Faith Pt. 2

Before Adam Was, Jesus Is! Pt. 1

Before Adam Was, Jesus Is! Pt. 2

Before Adam Was, Jesus Is! Pt. 3

Revisiting Jesus’ Eternal Existence Pt. 1

Revisiting Jesus’ Eternal Existence Pt. 2

Revisiting Jesus’ Eternal Existence Pt. 3

Revisiting Jesus’ Eternal Existence Pt. 4

Revisiting Jesus’ Eternal Existence Pt. 5

In this post I will be exposing Muhammadan Jalal Abualrub for his dishonest and inconsistency by applying a standard against the Shia, which he fails to use to himself and his Salafi sect.

I shall demonstrate that Jalal’s own criticism of the Shia comes back against to prove that he and his cult of death are guilty of the very shirk (the unforgiveable sin of ascribing partners with Allah [Cf. Q. 2:22; 4:48, 116]) that he accuses others of.

Here’s what he wrote in his tirade against the Shia:

ETERNAL IMAMS?

Ali Ibn Abu Talib, the Prophet’s paternal cousin and son-in-law, as well as, the other claimed Shi’a Imams, existed with Allah from the beginning, so the Shi’as claim. For instance, they claim that Ali said, “I am the first, and the last, and the upper-most and the inner-most, and I am the inheritor of the earth” (Al-Kash-shi. Rijal Al-Kash-shi, Pg., 138).  

Therefore, according to Shi’a creed, Ali left nothing much that is uniquely for Allah, the Exalted, the All-Mighty, Who says this about Himself in the Quran, {He is the First (nothing is before Him) and the Last (nothing is after Him), the Most-High (nothing is above Him) and the Most-Near (nothing is nearer than Him)} (57:3). (Abualrub, The Jewish Temple Rebuilt by the Shia, edited by Alaa Mencke [Madinah Publishers and Distributors, Third Edition 2021], p. 18)

And:

DIVINE IMAMS?

According to Shi’a sources, Allah, the Exalted, the All-Mighty, shares His attributes with their Shi’a Imams. This includes the right to receive invocation, which is no longer directed at Allah, Alone, but at Shi’a Imams, as well.

The Shi’a beautify their speeches, houses, places of worship, offices, cars, buses, etc., with statements of polytheistic invocation to others besides Allah, such as, “Ya Ali; Ya Husain; Ya Abbas,” which mean, “O, Ali; O, Husain (Ali’s son); O, Abbas (the Prophet’s paternal uncle).” Consequently, the Shi’as seek help from the dead by invoking them for all types of needs, such as seeking them for cure, success, money, and so forth. This, in itself, constitutes shirk, meaning, ideas and acts of polytheism.

The Shi’as also swear by Ali, Husain, Abbas, as they would swear by Allah, the Exalted, the All-Mighty, the Creator of all that exists. Allah, the Exalted, said, {And the Masajid are for Allah (Alone), so invoke not anyone along with Allah} (72:18).

Allah, the All-Mighty, also said, {Say (O, Muhammad): “I invoke my Lord (Allah Alone), and I associate none as partners along with Him”} (72:20).

Furthermore, Muhammad, Allah’s Messenger said, “He who swears by other than Allah, will have committed Shirk (Polytheism)” (Al-Albani. Shar’h At-Ta’hawiyyah, hadeeth no. 237).

Consequently, according to the Quran and Muhammad who was sent with it, creation can only, and exclusively, invoke and swear by Allah, Alone. Invoking others besides Allah, the Exalted, the All-Mighty, is an act of disbelief and polytheism. In contrast, major Shi’a scholars seem to believe that to worship Allah alone is shirk, meaning, polytheism, but to worship Allah and the Imams together, is tau’heed, meaning, monotheism. (Ibid., pp. 20-21)

YA MUHAMMAD! SUNNI INVOCATION OF A DEAD MAN

To make matters worse for Jalal, he seems to have forgotten that there are rigorously authenticated Sunni traditions where Muslims called upon their dead prophet, such as the following:

THE HADITH OF THE MAN IN NEED

Moreover, Tabarani, in his “al-Mu’jam al saghir,” reports a hadith from ‘Uthman ibn Hunayf that a man repeatedly visited Uthman ibn Affan concerning something he needed, but Uthman paid no attention to him or his need. The man met Ibn Hunayf and complained to him about the matter – this being after the death (wisal) of the Prophet and after the caliphates of Abu Bakr and Umar – so Uthman ibn Hunayf, who was one of the Companions who collected hadiths and was learned in the religion of Allah, said: “Go to the place of ablution and perform ablution (wudu), then come to the mosque, perform two rak’as of prayer therein, and say:

‘O Allah, I ask You and turn to You through our Prophet Muhammad, the Prophet of mercy; O MUHAMMAD (YA MUHAMMAD), I turn through you to my Lord, that He may fulfill my need,’ and mention your need. Then come so that I can go with you [to the caliph Uthman].” So the man left and did as he had been told, then went to the door of Uthman ibn Affan, and the doorman came, took him by the hand, brought him to Uthman ibn Affan, and seated him next to him on a cushion. ‘Uthman asked, “What do you need?” and the man mentioned what he wanted, and Uthman accomplished it for him, then he said, “I hadn’t remembered your need until just now,” adding, “Whenever you need something, just mention it.” Then, the man departed, met Uthman ibn Hunayf, and said to him, “May Allah reward you! He didn’t see to my need or pay any attention to me until you spoke with him.” Uthman ibn Hunayf replied, “By Allah, I didn’t speak to him, but I have seen a blind man come to the Messenger of Allah and complain to him of the loss of his eyesight. The Prophet said, “Can you not bear it?’ and the man replied, ‘O Messenger of Allah, I do not have anyone to lead me around, and it is a great hardship for me.’ The Prophet told him, ‘Go to the place of ablution and perform ablution (wudu), then pray two rak’as of prayer and make the supplications.’” Ibn Hunayf went on, “By Allah, we didn’t part company or speak long before the man returned to us as if nothing had ever been wrong with him.”

This is an explicit, unequivocal text from a prophetic Companion proving the legal validity of tawassul through the dead. The account has been classified as rigously authenticated (SAHIH) by Baihaqi, Mundhiri, and Haythami. (Nuh Ha Mim Keller, Tawassul: Supplicating Allah through an Intermediary (From Reliance of the Traveller) http://seekershub.org/ans-blog/2011/07/02/tawassul-supplicating-allah-through-an-intermediary/; bold and capital emphasis mine)

And here’s one from al-Bukhari:

Abu Nu’aym related to us who said that Sufyan related to us from Abu Ishaq from Abdar Rahman ibn Sa’d, who said: Ibn Umar had numbness in his leg, whereupon a man said to him: “Remember the most beloved of people to you”, so he said: “Ya Muhammad” (Al-Bukhari, al-Adab al-Mufrad, Chapter of What should be Done if Leg becomes Numb, Hadith No. 964 *; emphasis mine)

Here is another rendering of this same narration:

437. What a man says when his foot goes to sleep

964. ‘Abdu’r-Rahman ibn Sa’d said, “Ibn ‘Umar’s foot went to sleep and a man said to him, ‘Mention the person you love most.’ He said, ‘Muhammad.'” (Aisha Bewley, Al-Adab Al-Mufrad Al-Bukhari, XD. Gestures *)

Hence, Jalal slanderously accuses the Shia of the very thing that his own terrorist cult is known for doing, namely, invoke a dead man who can neither hear nor aid them.

ALLAH CLOTHES MUHAMMAD WITH HIS ATTRIBUTES

What Jalal deceitfully withheld from his readers is that his own sect believes that Allah shares his attributes with Muhammad!

For instance, Allah bestowed on Muhammad his very title of “First and the Last”:

(Al-Shami added:) As he went on he was met by some of Allah’s creatures who said: “Peace be upon you, O First One! (Ya Awwal). Peace upon you, O Last One! (Ya Akhir). Peace be upon you, O Gatherer! (Ya Hashir).” Gibril said to him: “Return their greeting,” and he did. Then he saw them another time and they said the same thing. Then he saw them a third time and again they greeted him. He said: “Who are they, O Gibril?” He replied: “Ibrahim, Musa, and Isa.”

The Prophet then passed by Musa as he was praying in his grave at a place of red sandhills. He was tall, with long hair and brown complexion, similar to one of the Shanu’a – the [Yemeni] men of pure lineage and manly virtue. He was saying with a loud voice: “You have honored him and preferred him!” Then the Prophet greeted him and he returned his greeting. Musa said: “Who is this with you, O Gibril?” He replied: “This is Ahmad.” He said: “Welcome to the Arabian Prophet who acted perfectly with his Community!” and he made an invocation for blessing on his behalf. Then he said: “Ask ease for you Community.” (The Prophet’s Night Journey and Heavenly Ascent: Gibril Fouad Haddad, p. 13; bold emphasis mine)

And in the Quran, Jalal’s god even went as far as to ascribe two of his characteristics to his “messenger”:

A messenger has come to you from yourselves, concerned over your suffering, anxious over you, towards those who acknowledge he is kind, compassionate (raoof raheemun). S. 9:128

INDEED, there has come unto you [O mankind] an Apostle from among yourselves: heavily weighs – upon him [the thought] that you might suffer [in the life to come]; full of concern for you [is he, and] full of compassion and mercy towards the believers.

The words raoof raheemun appear only five other times, and always in relation to the Islamic deity:

God has pardoned the prophet and the emigrants and the supporters that followed him in the darkest moment, even though the hearts of some of them nearly deviated, but then He pardoned them. He is towards them Kind, Compassionate. S. 9:117 QRT

All this is from God ‘s favor upon you and His mercy. God is Kind, Compassionate. S. 24:20 QRT – cf. Q. 16:7, 47; 59:10

Amazingly, traditional Muslim scholars (both ancient and modern) candidly admit that the text of Q. 9:128 explicitly testifies that Allah has given Muhammad some of his own divine characteristics:

“… the objectification of Muhammad reaches its peak in Surah 9, which is indubitably one of the latest Madinan surahs. It repeatedly refers to ‘Allah and His Messenger’ (9.1, 3, 7, 16, 24, 29 etc.) and the penultimate ayah (9.128) describes the Messenger as ‘all-pitying all-merciful’, qualities which are elsewhere ascribed to Allah.” (Neal Robinson, Discovering the Qur’an: A Contemporary Approach to a Veiled Text, 2^nd edition, [Georgetown University Press, Washington, D.C. 2003], p. 244)

And:

One of the men of knowledge, Al-Husayn ibn al-Fadl, said, “He honored him with two of His own names: the compassionate and the merciful (rauf, rahim).” The same point is made in another ayat: “Allah was kind to the believers when He sent among them a Messenger from among themselves.” (3:164)…

Jafar ibn Muhammad [as-Sadiq] said, “Allah knew that His creatures would not be capable of pure obedience to Him, so He told them this in order that they would realize that they would never be able to achieve absolute purity in serving Him. Between Himself and them He placed one of their own species, CLOTHING HIM IN HIS OWN ATTRIBUTES OF COMPASSION AND MERCY. He brought him out as a truthful ambassador to creation and made it such that when someone obeys him, they are obeying Allah, and when someone agrees with him, they are agreeing with Allah.” Allah says: “Whoever obeys the Messenger has obeyed Allah.” (4:80)

As-Samarqandi explains that the words a mercy to all the worlds mean for both the jinn and mankind. It is also said that it means for all creation. He is a mercy to the believers by guiding them, a mercy to the hypocrites by granting them security from being killed, and a mercy to the unbelievers by deferring their punishment. Ibn Abbas said, “He is a mercy to the believers and also to the unbelievers since they are safe from what befell the other communities who cried lies.” It is related that the Prophet said to Jibril, “Has any of this mercy touched you?” He replied, “Yes, I used to have fear about what would happen to me, but now I feel safe because of the way Allah praised me when He said, ‘Possessing power, secure with the Lord of the Throne, obeyed, then trusty.’” (81:21) (Qadi Iyad Ibn Musa al-Yahsubi, Kitab Ash-shifa bi ta’rif huquq al-Mustafa (Healing by the recognition of the Rights of the Chosen One), translated by Aisha Abdarrahman Bewley [Madinah Press, Inverness, Scotland, U.K., third reprint 1991, paperback], Part One. Allah’s great estimation of the worth of his Prophet expressed in both word and action, Chapter One. Allah’s praise of him and his great esteem for him, Section 1. Concerning praise of him and his numerous excellent qualities, pp. 4-6; emphasis mine)

Again:

Section 14. On Allah honouring the Prophet WITH SOME OF HIS OWN BEAUTIFUL NAMES and describing him with some of His own Sublime Qualities

… He has preferred our Prophet Muhammad since He has adorned him with a wealth of His names in His Mighty Book and on the tongues of His Prophets… One of His names is the Praiseworthy (al-Hamid). This means the One who is praised because He praises Himself and His slaves praise him. It also means the One who praises Himself and praises acts of obedience. The Prophet is called Muhammad and Ahmad. Muhammad means praised, and that is how his name occurs in the Zabur of David. Ahmad means the greatest of those who give praise and the most sublime of those who are praised. Hassan ibn Thabit indicated this when he said:

It is taken for him from His own name in order to exalt him.

The One with the Throne is praised (Mahmud) and he is Muhammad.

Two of Allah’s names are the Compassionate, the Merciful (ar-Ra’uf, ar-Rahim). They are similar in meaning. He calls him by them in His Book when He says, “Compassionate, merciful to the believers.” (9.128) (Ibid., Chapter Three. On The Sound And Well-Known Traditions Related About The Immense Value Placed On Him By His Lord, His Exalted Position And His Nobility In This World And The Next, pp. 126-127; emphasis mine)

Therefore, Jalal’s attack on the Shia Muslims backfire against him since his very own cult is guilty of deifying Muhammad by ascribing to him the qualities and names of the Islamic deity.

ALLAH SWEARS BY CREATION

Jalal also didn’t bother to mention the fact that his Islamic book, on several occasions, records Allah swearing by the moon and other objects, which the pagans took as gods:

Nay, by the Moon. S. 74:32 Pickthall

And by the moon when it is at the full, S. 84:18 Hilali-Khan

And by the sun and its brightness; And by the moon as it follows it (the sun); S. 91:1-2 Hilali-Khan

If this wasn’t bad enough, Allah swears by absolutely everything that exists!

I swear by that which you see, and that which you do not see. S. 69:38-39

To say that Allah swears by what’s seen and unseen means that he swears by absolutely everything!

In order to help this Muhammadan idolator understand the gravity of the situation, Q. 69:38-39 implies that Allah doesn’t only swear by the sun or the moon, but also by the idols people worship, animals such as pigs, women, pornography, drugs such as crack cocaine, alcohol, toilets and what’s in them etc. It even implies that Allah swore by Satan himself, as well as all the other demons!

The problem that this creates for Allah is that, as even Jalal noted, Muhammad stated that to swear by something other than Allah is to commit the unforgivable sin of shirk, or associating partners with Allah:

Narrated ‘Umar:
The Prophet said, “If anybody has to take an oath, he should swear ONLY by Allah.” The people of Quraish used to swear by their fathers, but the Prophet said, “Do not swear by your fathers.” (Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 58, Number 177 https://sunnah.com/bukhari:3836)

Chapter 9. What Has Been Related About ‘Whoever Swears By Other Than Allah, He Has Committed Shirk’

1535. Sa‘d Ibn ‘Ubaidah narrated that ‘Umar heard a man saying: “No, by the Ka‘bah” so Ibn ‘Umar said: “Nothing is sworn by other than Allah, for I heard the Messenger of Allah say: ‘WHOEVER swears by other than Allah, he has committed disbelief or Shirk.’” (Sahih) (English Translation of Jami‘ At-Tirmidhi, Compiled by Imam Hafiz Abu ‘Eisa Mohammad Ibn ‘Eisa At-Tirmidhi, translated by Abu Khaliyl (USA), ahadith edited and referenced by Hafiz Tahir Zubair ‘Ali Za’i [Darussalam Publishers & Distributors, First Edition: November 2007], Volume 3, 18. The Chapters On Vows And Oaths From The Messenger Of Allah, p. 309 https://sunnah.com/tirmidhi:1535; emphasis mine)

To make matters worse, Allah swore on these things from all eternity since, according to Islam, the Qur’an is eternal, which means that Allah’s swearing took place before creation. This basically implies that Allah made every created thing his partners in eternity, thereby committing the worst possible shirk imaginable!

This not only proves that Allah is an evildoer for setting up objects such as the moon or Satan as his partners, it also proves that he is not the God of the Holy Bible.

The true God of the Holy Bible only swears by himself since, as the Scriptures emphatically teach, there is nothing comparable or greater than him to swear by:

“For when God made a promise to Abraham, because He could swear by no one greater, He swore by Himself.” Hebrews 6:13

“For men indeed swear by the greater, and an oath for confirmation is for them an end of all dispute.” Hebrews 6:16

Thus, that Jalal’s god swears by everything in existence is not only a clear indication that he is not the same as YEHOVAH God, it also proves (at least from the biblical perspective) that every created thing is just as great, if not greater than, the Muhammad’s deity!

FURTHER READING

The Deification of Muhammad

Five Step Outline Proving Muhammad is Worshiped as a God

INVOCATION AND WORSHIP: THE ISLAMIC DILEMMA PT. 2

Mohammed Hijab Proves Muslims are Muhammadans who Worship a False Prophet!

Allah’s Oaths

Muhammad and Oath-Making

The Quran mentions that believers will have young boys serving them forever in paradise:

And round them shall go boys of theirs as if they were hidden pearls. S. 52:24 Shakir

And round about them shall go youths never altering in age; when you see them you will think them to be scattered pearls. S. 76:19 Shakir

The Islamic scripture even refers to these eternal youths in a rather peculiar and baffling context:

“in gardens of delight: many of the former; and few of the last. Reposing on couches adorned with gold and precious stones; sitting opposite to one another thereon. Youths which shall continue for ever, shall go round about [to attend] them, with goblets, and beakers, and a cup of flowing: Their heads shall not ache by the same, neither shall they bleed/hemorrhage (yunzifoona):” S. 56:12-19

One is left wondering, why would the Quran emphasize that the ones entering paradise will not bleed or hemorrhage? Moreover, what is the connection between the inhabitants of paradise never bleeding and the youth that look like pearls?

The answer may come as a shock.

Certain Muslims are of the opinion that these verses actually affirm that Allah will allow homosexuality and pederasty in paradise!  

As former New York times columnist Judith Miller wrote in regards to the assassination of Egyptian professor and columnist Farag Foda:

“About two weeks before his murder, he mocked what passed for intellectual discourse among Islamists by citing a recent sermon by Egypt’s most popular preacher, Abdel Hamid Kishk, a blind sheikh who constantly attacked both the government and its official religious establishment. Kishk had been telling his audience that Muslims who entered paradise would enjoy ETERNAL ERECTIONS and the company of young boys draped in earrings and necklaces. Some of the ulema, the religious scholars at al-Azhar, the government’s seat of Islamic learning had disagreed. Yes, they said, men in paradise would have erections, BUT MERELY PROTRACTED, NOT PERPETUAL. Other experts disputed the possibility of pederasty in paradise. ‘Is this what concerns Muslims at the end of the 20th century?’ Foda asked in a column in October magazine. ‘The world around us is busy with the conquest of space, genetic engineering and the wonders of the computer,’ while Muslim scholars, he wrote ‘in sadness and pain,’ were worried about sex in paradise. In a column published just before he was killed, Foda reported that the Tunisian government had videotaped militant Islamic leaders on their prayer rugs, unwilling to await paradise, making love to beautiful women here on earth. Meanwhile, Egyptian militants in Assyut were ordering believers not to eat eggplants and squash because of their resemblance to sexual organs. ‘The Groups of Darkness are obsessed with sex,’ he wrote.” (Miller, God Has Ninety-Nine Names [A Touchstone Book, published by Simon & Schuster, 1997], pp. 26-27; bold and capital emphasis mine)

Pay close attention to the fact that not all of the experts disagreed with Kishk’s views regarding the permissibility of pederasty or that men will have eternal erections in Allah’s whorehouse.

Here’s another source:

“Abul-Ala Maari said that homosexuality will be permissible in paradise. He based this opinion on Sura al-Waqi‘a 56:17-23: “Round about them are male youths of freshness … and there will be huris (‘beautiful companions with large and lustrous eyes, like pearls well-guarded’)”…

“Abul-Ala said: ‘If wine is prohibited in this world and allowed in paradise, the same will happen with homosexuality’ (Risala al-ghufran by al-Maarri and Khawater Muslim fi al-mas’ala al-Jinsiyya by Muhammad Jalal Kishk).” (True Guidance [Light of Life, P.O. Box 13, A-9503 Villach, Austria], Part 4. An Introduction to Quranic Studies, p. 122; bold emphasis mine)

In fact, these Quranic texts may have been the impetus behind Muslim men desiring to sleep with young boys, and the reason why others felt free to express their homosexual desires in writing.

Professor Philip K. Hitti writes:

“The servants were almost all slaves recruited from non-Muslim peoples and captured by force, taken prisoners in time of war or purchased in time of peace. The white slaves (Mamluk) were mainly Greeks and Slavs, Armenians and Berbers. Certain slaves were eunuchs (khisyan) attached to the service of the harem. Others termed ghilman, who might also be eunuchs, were the recipients of special favour from their masters, wore rich and attractive uniforms and often beautified and perfumed their bodies in effeminate fashion. We read that ghilman in the reign of al-Rashid, but it was evidently al-Amin who, following the Persian precedent, established in the Arabic world the Ghilman institution for the practice of unnatural sexual relations. A judge under al-Mamun used four hundred such youths. Poets like abu-Nuwas did not disdain to give public expression to their perverted passions and to address amorous pieces of their composition to beardless young boys.” (Hitti, History of the Arabs from the Earliest Times to the Present, revised tenth edition, new preface by Walid Khalidi [Palgrave Macmillan, 2002; paperback], p. 341; bold emphasis mine)

Writing on the reasons for the collapse of the Abbasid Empire, Hitti states:

Then there were the social and moral forces of disintegration. The blood of the conquering element became in course of centuries diluted with that of the conquered, with a subsequent loss of their dominating position and qualities. With the decay of the Arab national life, Arab stamina and morale broke down. Gradually the empire developed into an empire of the conquered. The large harems, made possible by the countless number of eunuchs, the girl and THE BOY SLAVES (ghilman), who contributed most to the degradation of womenhood AND DEGENERATION OF MANHOOD; the unlimited concubines and the number of half-brothers and half-sisters in the imperial household with their unavoidable jealousies and intrigues; the luxurious scale of high living with the emphasis on wine and song – all these and other similar forces sapped the vitality of family life and inevitably produced the persistently feeble heirs to the throne. The position of these feeble heirs was rendered still more feeble by their interminable disputes over a right of succession which was never definitely determined. (Ibid., 485; bold and capital emphasis mine)

It now makes sense.

The Quran is assuring both men and women that enter paradise that they will not bleed from having intercourse with these boys since it will be a different type of sex, one which will cause no pain or rupture.

 SEXUAL ORGIES GALORE!

After all, don’t the Muslim scripture and ahadith claim that men will have heavenly whores to deflower with penises that are not soft, but hard? And do they not plainly state that these whores will not suffer any pain from being deflowered by these men with everlasting erections?

But for him who [the true believer of Islamic Monotheism who performs all the duties ordained by Allah and His Messenger Muhammad, and keeps away (abstain) from all kinds of sin and evil deeds prohibited in Islam and] fears the standing before his Lord, there will be two Gardens (i.e. in Paradise). Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you both (jinns and men) deny? With spreading branches; Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you both (jinns and men) deny? In them (both) will be two springs flowing (free) Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you both (jinns and men) deny? In them (both) will be every kind of fruit in pairs. Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you both (jinns and men) deny? Reclining upon the couches lined with silk brocade, and the fruits of the two Gardens will be near at hand. Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you both (jinns and men) deny? Wherein both will be those (maidens) restraining their glances upon their husbands, whom no man or jinn yatmithhunna (HAS OPENED THEIR HYMENS WITH SEXUAL INTERCOURSE) before them. Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you both (jinns and men) deny? (In beauty) they are like rubies and coral. Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you both (jinns and men) deny? Is there any reward for good other than good? Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you both (jinns and men) deny? And besides these two, there are two other Gardens (i.e. in Paradise). Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you both (jinns and men) deny? Dark green (in colour). Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you both (jinns and men) deny? In them (both) will be two springs gushing forth water. Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you both (jinns and men) deny? In them (both) will be fruits, and date- palms and pomegranates. Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you both (jinns and men) deny? Therein (gardens) will be fair (wives) good and beautiful; Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you both (jinns and men) deny? Houris (beautiful, fair females) restrained in pavilions; Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you both (jinns and men) deny? Whom no man or jinn yatmithhunna (has opened their hymens with sexual intercourse) before them. S. 55:46-74 Hilali-Khan

4337. Abu ‘Umama reported that Allah’s Messenger said, “Allah will not admit anyone in the Paradise but Allah, the Mighty and Glorious, will marry him with seventy two wives: two will be from virgins (haurine) with big eyes and seventy will be his inheritance from the people of the Hell-Fire (1). Everyone of them will have A PLEASANT VAGINA and HE (the man) WILL HAVE A SEXUAL ORGAN THAT DOES NOT BEND DOWN (during sexual intercourse).”

Hisham b. Khalid says, “The words ‘out of his inheritance (due) from the denizens of the Fire’, many men who will enter the Fire and the inmates of the Paradise will inherit their wives just as Faraoh’s[sic] wife will be inherited (by the believer).”

According to al-Zawa’id, its isnad has some controversy. Al-‘Ajali has declared Khalid b. Yazid b. Abi Malik reliable while Imam Ahmad, Ibn Mu’in, Abu Dawud, Nasa’i, Ibn Jarud Sahi, ‘Uqail etc., have declare[sic] Ahmad b. Salih al-Misri da’if. (Sunan Ibn-I-Majah (Imam Abu Abdullah Muhammad b. Yazid Ibn-I-Maja Al-Qazwini), English version by Muhammad Tufail Ansari [Kazi Publications, Lahore (Pakistan), 1st edition 1995], Chapter NO. XXXIX, “The Description of the Paradise”, Volume V, p. 546; capital emphasis mine)

Here’s another rendering of the aforementioned hadith:

37 Zuhd

(39) Chapter: Description of Paradise

It was narrated from Abu Umamah that the Messenger of Allah said:

“There is no one whom Allah will admit to Paradise but Allah will marry him to seventy-two wives, two from houris and seventy from his inheritance from the people of Hell, all of whom will have desirable front passages and he will have a male member that never becomes flaccid (i.e., soft and limp).’”

Grade: Da’if (Darussalam)

Reference: Sunan Ibn Majah 4337

In-book reference: Book 37, Hadith 238

English translation: Vol. 5, Book 37, Hadith 4337 (sunnah.com https://sunnah.com/ibnmajah:4337; emphasis mine)

The two Jalals noted in reference to Q. 56:36 that,

and made them virgins, immaculate – every time their spouses enter them they find them virgins, nor is there any pain [of defloration] – (Tafsir al-Jalalayn https://www.altafsir.com/tafasir.asp?tmadhno=0&ttafsirno=74&tsorano=56&tayahno=36&tdisplay=yes&userprofile=0&languageid=2; bold emphasis mine)

And regarding Q. 36:55 they write:

Indeed today the inhabitants of Paradise are busy (read fi shughlin or fi shughulin), [oblivious] to what the inhabitants of the Fire are suffering, [busy] delighting in pleasures such as deflowering virgins – not busy with anything wearisome, as there is no toil in Paradise – rejoicing, blissful (fakihuna is a second predicate of inna, the first being fi shugulin, ‘busy’); (Tafsir al-Jalalayn https://www.altafsir.com/tafasir.asp?tmadhno=0&ttafsirno=74&tsorano=36&tayahno=55&tdisplay=yes&userprofile=0&languageid=2; bold emphasis mine)

In fact, didn’t Muhammad even say that people will still have children in paradise?

37 Zuhd

(39) Chapter: Description of Paradise

It was narrated from Abu Sa’eed Al-Khudri that the Messenger of Allah said:

“When the believer wants a child in Paradise, he will be conceived and born and grown up, in a short while, according to his desire.”

Grade: Hasan (Darussalam)

Reference: Sunan Ibn Majah 4338

In-book reference: Book 37, Hadith 239

English translation: Vol. 5, Book 37, Hadith 4338 (sunnah.com https://sunnah.com/ibnmajah:4338)

And didn’t he further inform his followers that in paradise believers will not urinate, defecate, spit etc., even though they will be eating and drinking from all the heavenly delights including wine, fruits etc.?

37 Zuhd

(39) Chapter: Description of Paradise

It was narrated from Abu Hurairah that the Messenger of Allah said:

“The first group to enter Paradise will enter with (faces) like the moon in the night when it is full. Then those who follow them will be shining with a light brighter than the brightest star in the sky. They will not urinate or defecate, or blow their noses or spit. Their combs will be of gold, their sweat will be musk, their braziers (receptacle for holding live coals for burning incense) will be pearls and their wives will be houris. Their form will be that of a single man, the form of their father Adam, sixty forearm’s length tall.’”

Another chain reports the same.

Grade: Sahih (Darussalam)

Reference: Sunan Ibn Majah 4334

In-book reference: Book 37, Hadith 234

English translation: Vol. 5, Book 37, Hadith 4333 (sunnah.com https://sunnah.com/ibnmajah:4333; emphasis mine)

That’s not all.

Muhammad is also reported to have taught that in paradise there is a market where Muslims can get whatever they desire without costing them anything:

37 Zuhd

(39) Chapter: Description of Paradise

Sa’eed bin Al-Musayyab said that he met Abu Hurairah and Abu Hurairah said:

“I supplicate Allah to bring you and I together in the marketplace of Paradise,” Sa’eed said: “Is there a marketplace there?” He said: “Yes. The Messenger of Allah told me that when the people of Paradise enter it, they will take their places according to their deeds, and they will be given permission for a length of time equivalent to Friday on earth, when they will visit Allah. His Throne will be shown to them and He will appear to them in one of the gardens of Paradise. Chairs of light and chairs of pearls and chairs of rubies and chairs of chrysolite and chairs of gold and chairs of silver will be placed for them. Those who are of a lower status than them, and none of them will be regarded as insignificant, will sit on sandhills of musk and camphor, and they will not feel that those who are sitting on chairs are seated better than them.”

Abu Hurairah said: “I said: ‘O Messenger of Allah, will we see our Lord?’ He said: ‘Yes. Do you dispute that you see the sun and the moon on the night when it is full?’ We said: ‘No.’ He said: ‘Likewise, you will not dispute that you see your Lord, the Glorified. There will be no one left in that gathering with whom Allah does not speak face to face, until He will say to a man among you: “Do you not remember, O so-and-so, the day you did such and such?” And He will remind him of some of his sins in this world. He will say: “O Lord, have You not forgiven me?” He will say: “Yes, it is by the vastness of My forgiveness that You have reached the position you are in.” While they are like that, a cloud will cover them from above and will rain down on them perfume the like of whose fragrance they have never smelled before. Then He will say: “Get up and go to the honor that has been prepared for you, and take whatever you desire.”

So we will go to a marketplace surrounded by the angels, in which there will be such things as eyes have never seen, ears have never heard and it has not entered the heart of man. Whatever we desire will be carried for us. Nothing will be bought or sold therein. In that marketplace the people of Paradise will meet one another. A man of elevated status will meet those who are of lower status than him, but none shall be regarded as insignificant, and he will be dazzled by the clothes that he sees on him. He will not finish the last of his conversation before better clothes appear on him. That is because no one should be sad there.’” He said: “Then we will go back to our homes where we will be met by our wives, and they will say: ‘Welcome. You have come looking more handsome and with a better fragrance than when you left us.’ And we will say: ‘Today we sat with our Lord, the Compeller, the Glorified, and we deserve to come back as we have come back.’”

Grade: Hasan (Darussalam)

Reference: Sunan Ibn Majah 4336

In-book reference: Book 37, Hadith 237

English translation: Vol. 5, Book 37, Hadith 4336 (sunnah.com https://sunnah.com/ibnmajah:4336; emphasis mine)

This means that if men and women desire to have sex with these young boys, and therefore commit homosexuality, pederasty, adultery, orgies etc., it will be granted them.

After all, everything is fair game in Allah’s whorehouse which Muslims call paradise!

TO BLEED OR NOT TO BLEED?

Now just in case a Muhammadans wants to deny that the term yunzifoona in Q. 56:19,

“Their heads shall not ache by the same, neither shall they bleed/hemorrhage (yunzifoona).”

Means to bleed, notice how the following lexicons define the term:

Etymology

From the root

 ن ز ف‎ (n-z-f).

Verb

نَزَفَ (nazafa) 

I, non-past

 يَنْزِفُ‎‎ (yanzifu)

to drain, to let (blood), to draw off (blood)

to exhaust, to dry up (a well)

to bleed (profusely or to death), to lose blood

Conjugation

Conjugation of 

نَزَفَ

(form-I sound, verbal noun نَزْف)

Noun

نَزْف  (nazf) m

verbal noun of نَزَفَ (nazafa) 

(form I)

exhaustion, draining, emptying

hemorrhage, bleeding, loss of blood (https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/%D9%86%D8%B2%D9%81)

… nazafa (nazf) and IV to drain, let, draw off (blood); to exhaust, dry up (a well)… nuzifa damuhu to lose much blood, bleed profusely, bleed (to death) X to drain, aspirate (s.th., e.g., the lungs), to clean out (a wound); to draw off, draw out (.. a liquid); to exhaust, weaken (s.o., esp. through loss of blood, s.o.’s powers or strength); to devour, swallow up, consume, use up (s.o.’s means, resources, reserves); to exhaust, make thorough use of, utilize thoroughly (s.th., e.g., sources) (Hans Wehr, 4th ed., p. 1121)

… nazaf, I, U, INF. nazf, exhaust a well entirely; be entirely exhausted; pass. lose a great deal of blood; – I, INF. nazf., grow weak from loss of blood; pass. lose one’s clear senses, get intoxicated; pass. Have exhausted one’s arguments and give over disputing; – nazif, A., INF. nazaf, be entirely exhausted; – IV. INF. inzaf, be drunk; also – X. INF. istinzaf, exhaust one’s tears.

… nazf, nazaf, nuzf, hemorrhage, loss of blood; – nuzf, exhaustion of water’ – nazif, weakened by loss of blood; – nuzzaf, veins no longer bleeding; – nuzfa-t, pl. nuzaf, a few drops. (Steingass, p. 1113)

The last two lexical entrees can be accessed here: http://ejtaal.net/aa/#q=nzf.

OPEN CHALLENGE

In light of the foregoing I, hereby, challenge Muhammadans to produce an explicit, unambiguous command (or commands) from the Quran, which condemns homosexuality, lesbianism and bestiality.

Muslims may appeal to the story of Lot in the Quran where the men of the town are considered immoral for wanting to sleep with the male guests:

And (We sent) Lut when he said to his people: What! do you commit an indecency which any one in the world has not done before you? Most surely you come to males in lust besides females; nay you are an extravagant people. And the answer of his people was no other than that they said: Turn them out of your town, surely they are a people who seek to purify (themselves). So We delivered him and his followers, except his wife; she was of those who remained behind. And We rained upon them a rain; consider then what was the end of the guilty. S. 7:80-84 Shakir

And when Our messengers came unto Lot, he was distressed and knew not how to protect them. He said: This is a distressful day. And his people came unto him, running towards him – and before then they used to commit abominations – He said: O my people! Here are my daughters! They are purer for you. Beware of Allah, and degrade me not in (the person of) my guests. Is there not among you any upright man? They said: Well thou knowest that we have no right to thy daughters, and well thou knowest what we want. He said: Would that I had strength to resist you or had some strong support (among you)! (The messengers) said: O Lot! Lo! we are messengers of thy Lord; they shall not reach thee. So travel with thy people in a part of the night, and let not one of you turn round – (all) save thy wife. Lo! that which smiteth them will smite her (also). Lo! their tryst is (for) the morning. Is not the morning nigh? So when Our commandment came to pass We overthrew (that township) and rained upon it stones of clay, one after another, Marked with fire in the providence of thy Lord (for the destruction of the wicked). And they are never far from the wrong-doers. S. 11:77-83 Pickthall

None of the aforementioned texts provide any support that the Muslim scripture condemns homosexuality since, one can argue from the context that what the Quran is condemning is gang rape, i.e., that a group of men wanted to sleep with the male guests against their will.

Furthermore, trying to appeal to Lot’s negative comments about their lust of men and his willingness to offer his daughters in place of his guests to prove otherwise won’t help either, since Muslims would then need to agree that Lot’s willingness to allow his daughters to be violated by these men was something also acceptable in God’s sight.

Lot was obviously wrong in even suggesting that the evildoers sleep with his daughters, which implies he may have also been wrong in his views regarding same sex relations (at least as far as the Quran is concerned). The only way a Muslim can show that Lot’s condemnation of homosexual relationships was correct is to quote Quranic texts explicitly stating this.

Muhammadans may further argue that the Quranic account echoes the Genesis story, and since the OT condemns homosexuality, this establishes that the Quran does so as well (Cf. Lev. 18:22; 20:13).

It is true that the the Pentateuch condemns the evil men’s homosexual desire to sleep with the male guests as a moral abomination. However, this doesn’t prove that the Islamic scripture is doing likewise, since the Quran permits sexual relations which the Pentateuch condemns as morally reprehensible.

Case in point:

“If a man marries a woman who becomes displeasing to him because he finds something indecent about her, and he writes her a certificate of divorce, gives it to her and sends her from his house, and if after she leaves his house she becomes the wife of another man, and her second husband dislikes her and writes her a certificate of divorce, gives it to her and sends her from his house, or if he dies, then her first husband, who divorced her, is not allowed to marry her again after she has been defiled. That would be detestable in the eyes of the LORD. Do not bring sin upon the land the LORD your God is giving you as an inheritance.” Deuteronomy 24:1-4

Contrast this with what the Quran teaches:

“A divorce is only permissible twice: after that, the parties should either hold together on equitable terms, or separate with kindness. It is not lawful for you, (men), to take back any of your gifts (from your wives), except when both parties fear that they would be unable to keep the limits ordained by Allah. If ye (judges) do indeed fear that they would be unable to keep the limits ordained by Allah, there is no blame on either of them if she give something for her freedom. These are the limits ordained by Allah. So do not transgress them if any do transgress the limits ordained by Allah, such persons wrong (themselves as well as others). So if a husband divorces his wife (irrevocably), he cannot, after that, re-marry her until after she has married another husband and he has divorced her. In that case there is no blame on either of them if they re-unite, provided they feel that they can keep the limits ordained by Allah. Such are the limits ordained by Allah, which He makes plain to those who understand.” S. 2:229-230

What the true God calls abhorrent, detestable, Allah claims is the only legitimate way for a man to remarry his former spouse!

In light of the foregoing one can legitimately argue that, since the Quran nowhere explicitly condemns homosexuality, the men of Lot were not being judged for having homosexual inclinations but for wanting to rape the guests against their will.

A Muhammadan may shout “not so fast,” and appeal to the next citation, which says that Allah designed for a man to marry a woman:

The people of Lut gave the lie to the apostles. When their brother Lut said to them: Will you not guard (against evil)? Surely I am a faithful apostle to you; Therefore guard against (the punishment of) Allah and obey me: And I do not ask you any reward for it; my reward is only with the Lord of the worlds; What! do you come to the males from among the creatures And leave what your Lord has created for you of your wives? Nay, you are a people exceeding limits. They said: If you desist not, O Lut! you shall surely be of those who are expelled. He said: Surely I am of those who utterly abhor your doing: S. 26:160-168 Shakir

Yet again this can be easily explained away. One can understand that Allah wasn’t rebuking them for wanting to have sex with men, but for wanting to forsake their wives.

In other words, had these been unmarried men than there would have been no problem with them having sex with other men. Therefore, this reference can only be used to show that a man cannot abandon his wife to sleep with another man, but can only wed a man if he is unmarried.

Muhammadans may still want to appeal to Q. 29:28-29 where Lot condemns the men for coming into other men.

Again, one could account for the above by arguing that the condemnation of homosexuality in Lot’s story only shows that it was not acceptable at that time period. One can equally argue that just as the Quran abrogated other forbidden sexual relations, such as the Mosaic prohibition of marrying one’s former wife who went on to marry again, the Muslim book also did away with the prohibition of homosexuality; especially when we take this in light of the foregoing passages that imply that homosexual relations will be permitted in, of all places, Paradise!

More importantly, what does it say about the Quran’s stance on same sex relationships when the only evidence that a Muslim can muster to prove that Allah condemns homosexuality is the biblical story of Lot, which has been jumbled and garbled up by Muhammad?

FURTHER READING

The Quran and Lesbianism: An Open Challenge to Osama Abdallah

Does the Quran permit sexual relations outside of marriage?

Paul and Homosexuality

Paul of Tarsus: The Clear-Cut Hypocrite? The Apostle Paul Defended and Muhammad Exposed

Daniel, Allah and Muhammad: How a common three letter word can turn you into a homosexual

Islam and homosexuality? (response to the above)

In this post I provide a further illustration of just how incoherent, irrational and sexually perverse Islam truly is.  

Many people are unaware that Muhammad’s religion actually permits incest in certain situations, particularly in cases where a man sires a daughter out of wedlock. According to specific Muslim scholars, the man is free to marry and have sex with such a daughter since she is not considered to be a part of his lineage due to her being the result of adultery/fornication, i.e., zina.

These scholars based this understanding on the following Quranic text:

And it is He Who has created man from water, and has appointed for him kindred by blood, and kindred by marriage. And your Lord is Ever All-Powerful to do what He will. S. 25:54 Hilali-Khan

Here is renowned Muslim scholar and commentator al-Qurtubi’s explanation of Q. 25:54:

نَسَبًا وَصِهْرًا

النَّسَب وَالصِّهْر مَعْنَيَانِ يَعُمَّانِ كُلّ قُرْبَى تَكُون بَيْن آدَمِيَّيْنِ . قَالَ اِبْن الْعَرَبِيّ : النَّسَب عِبَارَة عَنْ خَلْط الْمَاء بَيْن الذَّكَر وَالْأُنْثَى عَلَى وَجْه الشَّرْع ; فَإِنْ كَانَ بِمَعْصِيَةٍ كَانَ خَلْقًا مُطْلَقًا وَلَمْ يَكُنْ نَسَبًا مُحَقَّقًا , وَلِذَلِكَ لَمْ يَدْخُل تَحْت قَوْله : ” حُرِّمَتْ عَلَيْكُمْ أُمَّهَاتكُمْ وَبَنَاتكُمْ ” [ النِّسَاء : 23 ] بِنْته مِنْ الزِّنَى ; لِأَنَّهَا لَيْسَتْ بِبِنْتٍ لَهُ فِي أَصَحّ الْقَوْلَيْنِ لِعُلَمَائِنَا وَأَصَحّ الْقَوْلَيْنِ فِي الدِّين ; وَإِذَا لَمْ يَكُنْ نَسَب شَرْعًا فَلَا صِهْر شَرْعًا فَلَا يُحَرِّم الزِّنَى بِنْت أُمّ وَلَا أُمّ بِنْت , وَمَا يَحْرُم مِنْ الْحَلَال لَا يَحْرُم مِنْ الْحَرَام ; لِأَنَّ اللَّه اِمْتَنَّ بِالنَّسَبِ وَالصِّهْر عَلَى عِبَاده وَرَفَعَ قَدْرهمَا , وَعَلَّقَ الْأَحْكَام فِي الْحِلّ وَالْحُرْمَة عَلَيْهِمَا فَلَا يَلْحَق الْبَاطِل بِهِمَا وَلَا يُسَاوِيهِمَا . قُلْت : اِخْتَلَفَ الْفُقَهَاء فِي نِكَاح الرَّجُل اِبْنَته مِنْ زِنًى أَوْ أُخْته أَوْ بِنْت اِبْنه مِنْ زِنًى ; فَحَرَّمَ ذَلِكَ قَوْم مِنْهُمْ اِبْن الْقَاسِم , وَهُوَ قَوْل أَبِي حَنِيفَة وَأَصْحَابه , وَأَجَازَ ذَلِكَ آخَرُونَ مِنْهُمْ عَبْد الْمَلِك بْن الْمَاجِشُونِ , وَهُوَ قَوْل الشَّافِعِيّ , وَقَدْ مَضَى هَذَا فِي ” النِّسَاء ” مُجَوَّدًا

“It is He Who has created man from water: Then has He established relationships of lineage and marriage: for thy Lord has power (over all things).” (Surah 25:54)

“Regarding the terms ‘lineage and relationship through marriage’:

“Lineage and relationship through marriage are two terms that describe the personal relationships that may exist between humans. Ibn Al-Arabi said, “Lineage is an expression referring to the mixture of fluids between a male and a female from a religious legal point of view. However, if this union (between male and female) occurs through disobedience (fornication) then the resulting child is not considered a part of a person’s true lineage. That is why a daughter born from adultery is not mentioned in Allah’s saying, ‘Prohibited to you (for marriage) are: your mothers and daughters’ (Surah 4:23) because she is not considered a daughter according to the most authentic teaching of our (Islamic) scholars and the most authentic teaching of our religion. If there is no legal lineage then there is no legal relationship; for adultery does not prohibit (from marriage) the daughter of the mother (you committed adultery with) nor the mother of a woman (you committed adultery with). What is lawfully prohibited is not also prohibited due to sin, for Allah has bestowed lineage and relation through marriage upon his servants and greatly esteemed these relationships. Allah has also established laws identifying what is legal and what is prohibited, which are not equal to each other; therefore falsehood cannot be a part of these laws.

“I (Qurtubi) said: The scholars have differed on the permissibility of a man marrying his daughter who was the result of an adulterous relationship; or for that matter marrying his sister or granddaughter who was the result of adultery. Some prohibited this type of relationship; among them was Ibn al-Qasim, which is also the saying of Abu Hanifah and his companions. Others however, allowed this type of marriage such as Abdul Malik al-Maj’shun, which is also the saying of al-Shafi’i. This was detailed in the explanation of Surah 4 (Al Nisa’).”

Thus, certain Muslim scholars and Islamic schools of jurisprudence allow for a man to marry his very own daughter, as long as she was born from fornication or an adulterous relationship!

If the foregoing doesn’t convince readers that there is something seriously wrong and satanic about the Islamic religion, then I don’t know what will.

FURTHER READING

The Quran’s Confused Stance on Sexual Ethics

REVISITING ISLAM’S GROSS SEXUAL ETHICS

MUHAMMAD AND ANAL SEX