Author: answeringislamblog

Ibrahim and the Wives of the Prophet

The Life of Muhammad

by Muhammad Husayn Haykal

Translated by Isma’il Razi A. al-Faruqi

Effect of the Conquest of Makkah upon the Peninsula

Muhammad returned to Madinah after his conquest of Makkah, his victory at Hunayn, and his siege of al Ta‘if. He had convinced all that no power could match his power within the Arabian Peninsula and that no tongue might henceforth vituperate him or spread any false information regarding himself or his cause. Both al Ansar and al Muhajirun returned heartened with joy that God had crowned His prophet’s endeavor with such success; that He enabled Muhammad to conquer the city of the holy Mosque, that He guided its people to Islam ; and that He inspired all Arab tribes to pledge their allegiance, loyalty and obedience to him. They all returned to Madinah in order to settle down in peace. Muhammad had taken care to appoint `Attab ibn Usayd as governor of Umm al Qura, or Makkah, and Mu’adh ibn Jabal as teacher of the people in matters of religion and in the Qur’an. This victory, the like of which the whole history of Arabia and all its traditions have never known, left a profound impression upon the Arabs. Whether lords and masters of land and cities, men to whom it had never occurred that a day might come when they would be subject to Muhammad or accept his faith as their religion, or poets who labored as mouthpieces of those masters in exchange for their patronage and protection, or, finally, simple tribesmen for whom personal freedom was till death the most priceless possession, the Arabs were all strongly affected by the conquest of Makkah, Hunayn and the siege of al Ta’if. To one and all, it now seemed that the poetry of the poets, the mastery of the chieftains, and the personal freedom of the tribesmen were all to no avail before the tremendous power of Muhammad and his followers.

Conversion of Ka’b ibn Zuhayr

Muhammad’s success among the Arabs of the Peninsula influenced them so profoundly that Bujayr ibn Zuhayr wrote a letter to his brother, Ka’b, after the Prophet’s withdrawal from al Ta’if, informing him that Muhammad had killed a number of men in Makkah who had slandered his reputation by spreading false rumors concerning him. Bujayr, after informing his brother that a number of these men had run away in all directions, advised him to hurry to Madinah to give himself up and repent. He assured him that the Prophet would not kill anyone who came to him repentent and warned him that unless he was prepared to do so, he should escape to the most distant place on earth to remain alive. Bujayr had indeed told the truth. Muhammad commanded the execution of only four persons, one of whom was a poet who had vituperated the Prophet severely, and two of whom had hurt his daughter, Zaynab, when with her husband’s permission, she sought to emigrate to Makkah to join her father. Ka’b recognized the veracity and timeliness of his brother’s advice; and, anxious not to spend the rest of his life as an outlaw, he hurried to Madinah, spent the night at a friend’s house, and came to the Prophet in the morning at the mosque to declare his conversion and pledge his allegiance. In the Prophet’s presence, Ka’b recited his famous poem which opened with the verse: “Great distance now separates me from Su’ad. My heart is orphaned and bereaved. It awaits the sacrifice which will ransom my beloved.” The Prophet forgave him and he became a good Muslim.

Conversion of Zayd al Khayl and Others

Another consequence of the same influence was that the tribes began to come to the Prophet to pledge their allegiance. Such was the case of a delegation headed by Zayd al Khayl who came to Madinah to pledge allegiance of the tribe of Tay’. Muhammad gave the delegation a fair welcome, conversed with their leader, and was so well pleased with him that he said: “No Arab has ever been praised before me but that when I finally met him I discovered that his eulogy surpassed his reality, except Zayd al Khayl concerning whom I had heard less than I have found.” The Prophet then changed the name of his guest from Zayd a1 Khayl (meaning literally, “increase of horses”) to Zayd al Khayr (“increase of goodness”), and the whole tribe of Tay’ entered into Islam under Zayd’s leadership.

‘Adiyy ibn Hatim al Ta’iy was a Christian who felt the strongest hatred for Muhammad. As he witnessed the rise of the Prophet and the Muslims and the spread of their dominion over the Peninsula, he loaded his goods, family, and children on his camel and joined his fellow Christians in al Sham. Indeed, ‘Adiyy escaped at the very time that ‘Ali ibn Abu Talib destroyed, at the Prophet’s command, the idol of Tay’ and seized a number of captives, including the daughter of Hatim and sister of ‘Adiyy and a large amount of booty. ‘Adiyy’s sister was brought to Madinah and was held in the captives’ quarters by the Mosque’s gate. As the Prophet passed through the gate one day, she said to him from behind the bars: “O Prophet of God! My father has perished and my supporter has deserted. Be merciful to me, that God may be merciful to you.” When the Prophet learned that her supporter was ‘Adiyy ibn Hatim al Ta’iy, the escapee, he refused to talk to her. She tried once more, and this time she succeeded. In conversation, the Prophet mentioned to her her father’s old prestige and noble reputation in pre-Islamic days. He praised him for the good name his hospitality had given to all Arabs. The Prophet then granted her her freedom, gave her respectable clothes and pocket money to satisfy her other needs, and sent her to her people with the first al Sham-bound caravan. Upon joining her brother, she mentioned to him the noble treatment Muhammad had accorded her. ‘Adiyy was so impressed by the Prophet’s chivalry that he returned with her to Madinah and joined the ranks of Islam immediately.

Likewise, following the conquest of Makkah, the victory of al Sham, and the siege of al Ta’if, the great and the poor, the tribes and the individuals, all came to Muhammad to acknowledge his mission and to convert to Islam. In the meantime, Muhammad remained in Madinah and, feeling reassured that God has given him victory, he enjoyed a measure of peaceful existence.

Muhammad’s Bereavement

The measure of peaceful existence which Muhammad enjoyed was not to last. His daughter, Zaynab, was seriously ill. After al Huwayrith and Habbar hurt her when she attempted to emigrate from Makkah, Zaynab suffered from a miscarriage from which she never recovered. With her loss, Muhammad’s only surviving child was Fatimah, for Umm Kulthum and Ruqayyah had passed away earlier. Muhammad was saddened by the loss of Zaynab. He surely appreciated her compassionate disposition and loyalty to her husband, Abu al ‘As! ibn al Rabi`, whom she had ransomed after his fall as captive at the Battle of Badr with jewelry her father had given her on her wedding. It did not matter that she, a Muslim, sought to ransom her husband, an unbeliever; nor that this unbeliever husband had fought against her father in a battle in which, had the Quraysh been victorious, Muhammad would have surely lost his life. The Prophet praised Zaynab’s good disposition and strong loyalty to her husband, and bemoaned her suffering from sickness during the whole time since her emigration from Makkah. It is no wonder that he felt bereaved at her loss. He felt the same deep concern for the well-being and happiness of others. It was his nature to sympathize with every sufferer, every bereaved, and to take the trouble to go everywhere within and outside of Madinah to visit the sick, console the destitute, and reassure the wounded. The hand of fate had here touched his own daughter. His tragedy was not the first of its kind, but the fifth, as he had previously lost two of his daughters and two sons. If he had found in God’s favorable disposition toward him a measure of consolation, he surely well deserved it.

The Birth of Ibrahim, Muhammad’s Son

Soon, Muhammad’s loss was to be compensated. Mariyah, his Coptic wife, gave birth to a son whom Muhammad called Ibrahim after the ancestor father of the Arabs as well as of hanifism and Islam. Until that day, and since the Archbishop of Alexandria had presented her to the Prophet, Mariyah had the status of a slave. She did not enjoy the benefits of a living quarter by the mosque as did the other wives of the Prophet, “the Mothers of Believers.” Muhammad had provided Mariyah with a second-story residence in one of the outskirts of Madinah, called today Mashrabat Umm Ibrahim. Her house, which was surrounded with vineyards, was where Muhammad used to visit her every now and then. He had chosen her for himself and gave her sister Sirin to Hassan ibn Thabit. Muhammad did not expect to have any more children as none of his wives except the late Khadijah had ever conceived, though some of them were quite young and capable of bearing children. When Mariyah gave birth to Ibrahim, the event brought to Muhammad, a man past sixty years of age, great joy and filled his heart with reassurance and jubilation. By giving birth to a child, the status of Mariyah was raised in the Prophet’s esteem; he now looked upon her as a free wife, indeed, as one enjoying a most favored position.

Jealousy of the Prophet’s Wives

It was natural that this change would incite no little jealousy among his other wives who continued to be barren. It was also natural that the Prophet’s esteem and affection for the newborn child and his mother increased that jealousy. Moreover, Muhammad had liberally, rewarded Salma, the wife of Abu Rafi`, for her role as midwife. He celebrated the birth by giving away a measure of grain to all the destitute of Madinah. He assigned the newborn to the care of Umm Sayf, a wet nurse, who owned seven goats whose milk she was to put at the disposal of the newborn. Every day Muhammad would visit the house of Mariyah in order to take another look at his son’s radiant face and to reassure himself of the newborn’s continued health and growth. All this incited the strongest jealousy among the barren wives. The question was, how far would these wives be able to bear the constant challenge?

One day, with the pride characteristic of new parents, the Prophet carried his son on his arm and walked into `A’ishah’s quarters in order to show him to her. He pointed out to her his great resemblance to his offspring. `A’ishah looked at the baby and said that she saw no resemblance at all. When the Prophet observed how much the child was growing, `A’ishah responded waspishly that any child given the amount of milk which Ibrahim was getting would grow just as big and strong as he. Indeed, the birth of Ibrahim brought such disaffection to the wives of the Prophet as would go beyond these and similar unfriendly answers. It reached such proportions that revelation itself voiced a special condemnation. Undoubtedly, the whole affair had left its imprint on the life of Muhammad as well as on the history of Islam.

Such far-reaching effects were natural in the circumstances. For Muhammad had granted to his wives a position hitherto unknown in Arabia. `Umar ibn al Khattab said, “By God, in pre-Islamic days, we never gave consideration to our women. It was only after God had revealed in their regard what He did that we started to do so. My wife came once seeking to dissuade me from doing what I had planned to do. When I answered her that this was none of her business, she said: `How strange of you, `Umar ibn al Khattab! You refuse to be told anything whereas your daughter may criticize her husband, the Prophet of God-may God’s peace and blessing be upon him-and do so so strongly that he remains worried the whole day long.’ Upon hearing this, I took my mantle and went straight to my daughter, Hafsah, and said to her: `0 my daughter, is it true that you criticize the Prophet of God and do so so strongly that he remains worried the whole day long?’ Hafsah answered: `Indeed, I and his other wives do criticize him.’ I said: `You had better be warned that this will bring both the punishment of God and the wrath of His Prophet upon you. O Daughter, do not be deceived by that woman who became too proud of herself because of her beauty or Muhammad’s love for her.’ I left my daughter and went to visit Umm Salamah, another wife of the Prophet and a close relative of mine. Upon asking her the same question, Umm Salamah replied: `How strange of you, O Ibn al Khattab ! Are you going to interfere in everything, even in the Prophet’s own domestic affairs?”‘ `Umar continued: “With this I was utterly rebuffed and I abandoned every thought I had entertained.” Muslim has related in his Sahih that Abu Bakr once sought the permission of the Prophet to visit him, and so did `Umar. Upon entrance into the Prophet’s living quarters, they found him sitting still and silent, surrounded by his wives. After announcing that he was about to break the silence with a story which he hoped the Prophet would find entertaining, he said: “O Prophet of God, if the daughter of Kharijah, [As in the Sahih of Muslim. In the account of Tabari there is no mention of a wife of ‘Umar by this name. In Ruh al Ma,’ani of Allnsi, the same statement by ‘Umar names “The daughter of Zayd” instead.] i.e., my wife, were ever seen or heard asking me for money, I would surely pull her hair.” The Prophet laughed, saying, “Here are my wives surrounding me and asking me for money.” Immediately, Abu Bakr rose to his daughter `A’ishah and pulled her hair and so did `Umar to his daughter, Hafsah. Both Abu Bakr and `Umar said to their daughters:

“Do you dare ask the Prophet of God what he cannot afford to give?” They answered: “No, by God, we do not ask him any such thing.” Actually, Abu Bakr and `Umar had sought to see the Prophet because the latter was conspicuously absent at the previous prayer in the mosque, and the Muslims had asked one another the cause of his absence. It was in connection with this conversation between Abu Bakr and `Umar and their daughters that the following verse was revealed “O Prophet, tell your wives that in case they want the pleasures of this world and its ornaments, you will give them their freedom and send them on their way in fairness that they may elsewhere seek what they desire. But if they want God, His Prophet, and the other world, then remind them that God has prepared for the virtuous among them a great reward.” [Qur’an, 30:28-29]

The Wives Plotting

As a matter of fact, the wives of the Prophet went as far as to plot against their husband. Muhammad was in the habit of visiting them immediately after the mid-afternoon prayer. According to one report, he once visited Hafsah (or Zaynab, daughter of Jahsh according to another version) and paid her an unusually long visit. This made all the other wives jealous. `A’ishah reported: “Hafsah and I plotted together that any wife whom the Prophet-May God’s peace and blessing be upon him -will visit will complain to him that she finds his breath undesirable, and will ask him whether he has eaten any maghafir (i.e., sweets with bad smells, and the Prophet could not stand bad smells). As he entered upon one of his wives, she asked him that question to which he answered: “No, but I have taken some honey at the quarters of Zaynab, which I will never do again.” Having agreed to the plot of `A’ishah and Hafsah, Sawdah related that when the Prophet approached her, she asked him whether he ate any maghafir to which he answered, “No.” She asked him: “Where then does this bad odor come from?” Muhammad replied: “Hafsah gave me a little honey, so then it must be that the bees that made that honey had picked it up from the blooms of the awful tree which produces the maghafir.” When he entered upon `A’ishah, the latter repeated to him the question of Sawdah, which he heard again from Safiyyah, whereupon he vowed never to touch that honey again. Upon hearing the other wives’ reports, Sawdah said: “May God be praised! We have deprived him of something he truly likes.” `A’ishah, however, looked askance at Sawdah and asked her to keep quiet.

Since the Prophet granted to his wives such an unusual position at a time when Arab women amounted to nothing at all in society, it was natural for his wives to abuse the liberty which none of their peers had known before, a liberty which went so far as to enable any of them to criticize the Prophet so severely as to spoil his disposition the rest of the day. He often ignored some of his wives, and avoided others on many occasions, precisely in order to discourage their abuse of his compassion. Even so, one of them was so moved by jealousy as to exceed all limits of decency. But when Mariyah gave birth to Ibrahim, they were incensed. They lost all the composure and self-mastery which Muhammad had for years been trying to instill into them. It was for this reason that `A’ishah had gone to the extreme of denying all resemblance between him and his son, a denial which amounted to an accusation of adultery on the part of the innocent Mariyah.

Their Rebellion

One day Hafsah went to her father’s house complaining about this situation. While the Prophet was in her room, Mariyah came to him and stayed with him some time. Upon Hafsah’s return she found the Prophet and Mariyah in her quarters and, as she waited for them to come out, her jealousy broke all bounds. When, finally, Mariyah left the quarters and Hafsah entered, she said to the Prophet: “I have seen who was here. By God, that was an insult to me. You would not have dared do that if I amounted to anything at all in your eyes.” At the moment Muhammad realized that such deep-lying jealousy might even move Hafsah to broadcast what she had seen among the other wives. In an attempt to please her, Muhammad promised that he would not go unto Mariyah if she would only refrain from broadcasting what she had seen. Hafsah promised to comply. However, she could not keep her promise as jealousy continued to affect her disposition. Hence, she intimated the secret to `A’ishah, who in turn reported it to the Prophet. He took it as evidence of Hafsah’s failure to keep her promise. Perhaps the affair did not stop with Hafsah and `A’ishah but spread to the other wives. Perhaps, too, all of them had noticed the high esteem in which Mariyah was held and sympathized with `A’ishah and Hafsah’s opposition to the Prophet. There is nothing unusual in the whole story, such gossip and petty jealousies being commonplace between man and his many wives. A man’s affection belongs where he puts it within his household, and the controversy which the daughters of Abu Bakr and ‘Umar had woven around the Prophet’s affection for Mariyah was utterly groundless. Previously we had seen that some disaffection had risen between the Prophet and his wives on various occasions because of the pocket money he allocated to them, or because of the honey Zaynab used to serve. Therefore, they had all the more reason to feel slighted and no little alienated when they discovered their husband’s inclination toward ‘A’ishah or his esteem for Mariyah.

An explosion was soon to come. One day, while the Prophet was staying with ‘A’ishah, his other wives delegated Zaynab, daughter of Jahsh, to go in and, in their name, to accuse him of injustice and unfairness to them, and to plead that his love for `A’ishah was a violation of the code which he himself had set down of a day and night for each of his wives. On the other hand, realizing that the Prophet did not care very much for her charms, and being no longer anxious to please him, Sawdah had given up her day and night to `A’ishah. But Zaynab was not satisfied with expressing the other wives’ indignation at this apparent injustice. She attacked `A’ishah personally. The latter was anxious to defend herself, but kept still in response to the Prophet’s reconciliating pleas. Seeing that `A’ishah was defenseless, Zaynab went to excess in her accusations, and the Prophet finally had to permit his favorite wife to take her defense into her own hands. `A’ishah spoke out with great eloquence in refuting Zaynab’s claims. The Prophet listened with obvious satisfaction and admired the perspicacity of Abu Bakr’s daughter.

Indeed, favoritism for some of his wives had created such controversy and antagonism among the “Mothers of the Believers” that Muhammad once thought of divorcing some of them, but they soon agreed to let him distribute his favors as he pleased. When Mariyah gave birth to Ibrahim, their jealousy was at its strongest, especially in the case of `A’ishah. Certainly, Muhammad’s leniency and gentleness encouraged rebellion, and the new status which he had conferred upon women in society fanned their vanity. Muhammad, however, was not free to spend his time dealing with household problems. The need soon came to be felt for a decisive lesson to reestablish discipline and to liberate him for teaching the message and fulfilling the mission of his prophethood. Hence, he decided to ignore his wives and, indeed, to threaten them with divorce. A lesson had to be taught to them, and the time had apparently come for a decision. Either these women were to return to reason or they would be given their freedom in a mutually convenient divorce.

The Prophet’s Separation from His Wives

Muhammad isolated himself from all his women for a full month and refused to talk about them to anyone. Nor did anyone dare talk to him concerning them. During this month, his mind was absorbed by his mission and the requirement of carrying the message of Islam beyond the Arabian Peninsula. Abu Bakr, `Umar, and his other in-laws as well, were deeply concerned over the sad fate that awaited the “Mothers of the Believers” now that they had exposed themselves to the anger of the Prophet and the consequent punishment of God. It was even said that Muhammad had divorced Hafsah, `Umar’s daughter, after she had divulged the secret she had promised to keep. The marketplace of Madinah hummed with rumors about the impending divorce of the Prophet’s wives. The wives, for their part, were repentent and apprehensive. They regretted that their jealousy of one another had carried them away, that they had abused and harmed their gentle husband who was to each one of them at all times an elder brother, a compassionate father, a nearest kin, and the best of everything that might be hoped for in this life and the next. Muhammad spent most of his time in a storeroom he owned, placing his servant Rabah at its doorstep as long as he was inside. Therein he used to sleep on a very hard bed of coarse date branches.

`Umar’s Reconciliation of the Prophet and His Wives

At the end of the month during which Muhammad vowed to separate himself from his wives, the Muslims were despondent over the prospect of Muhammad’s domestic affairs. Many signs of dejection and sorrow were apparent on their faces as they gathered in the mosque. `Umar ibn al Khattab sought out the Prophet in his isolation. He went to the storeroom and called out to his servant, Rabah, asking for permission to enter. Rabah went in to speak to the Prophet but came out silent, a sign that Muhammad did not wish to see anyone. `Umar asked once more. Once more Rabah went in and came out silent. At this, `Umar raised his voice that the Prophet might hear and, repeating his request for an audience, said: “O Rabah, seek permission for me to see the Prophet of God. I fear that he thinks that I have come to intercede for my daughter, Hafsah. By God, if he were to ask me to strike off her head, I would do so without hesitation.” The Prophet then permitted him to enter. He came in, sat down as his eyes roved around the room, and began to cry. Muhammad asked him why he was crying. Actually `Umar cried out of severe shock at seeing the Prophet lying on the only piece of furniture in the room, the miserable straw mat, whose pattern of weaving had imprinted itself on the Prophet’s side. He cried out of compassion for the Prophet’s isolation in a room absolutely empty except for a little barley, a skin, and a small container of water. After hearing `Umar’s explanation, Muhammad taught him a lesson on the necessity of renouncing the pleasures of the world in order to achieve inner peace. `Umar then said: “O Prophet of God, what difficulties do your wives present? If you have truly lost them through divorce, you still have God, His angels Jibril and Mikhail, Abu Bakr and me, and all the Muslims on your side.” He kept on talking to the Prophet in this vein until the latter felt pleased and even smiled. As the Prophet’s mood changed for the better, `Umar told him about the despondency of the Muslims gathered in the mosque and their bemoaning of his separation from his wives. The Prophet explained that he had not divorced his wives but that he meant only to teach them a lesson. `Umar immediately asked for and was granted permission to inform the Muslims waiting in the mosque. He hurried thither to announce the good news that the Prophet of God-May God’s peace and blessing be upon him -had not divorced his wives. It was in connection with this incident that the following verses of the Qur’an were revealed

“O Prophet, why do you forbid yourself that which God has made legitimate for you, namely, to seek to please your wives? God is certainly compassionate and merciful. God has made it legitimate for you to release yourself from your vows. He is your Lord, and He is the All-Wise and All-Knowing. The Prophet had intimated information to one of his wives, but she did not keep the secret. When God brought knowledge to the Prophet of her insincerity, and the Prophet blamed her for it, her asking who had told him the news thus divulged her secret. The Prophet answered that God, the All-Knowing and Omniscient, had informed him of the deed. If the insincere wife and her insincere confidante were to repent to God and purify their thoughts, then they would be forgiven. But if they persist in striving against him, then God will compensate him with His friendship, with that of Jibril, Salih, the believers and angels, who will assist him in his plight. In case he should divorce his wives, God might even replace them with better ones, with women who are Muslims, believing, pious, repentant, and virtuous, whether widowed or virgins.” [Qur’an, 30:1-5]

With this revelation, the whole affair was brought to a close. The wives of the Prophet, having regained their wisdom and common sense, returned to their husband repentant, pious, and confirmed in their faith. Once reconciled by their repentance, Muhammad returned to his wives and his domestic life resumed its peace-the necessary prerequisite for any man with a mission to perform.

The Judgment of Critical Historiography

In my opinion, the foregoing is the true account of the story of Muhammad’s self-imposed isolation from his wives, of the choice he gave them, of the incidents which led to his isolation as well as of its causes and consequences. This account is confirmed by all the evidence of the books of Qur’anic exegesis and of Hadith, as well as by the accounts of various biographies. The fact remains, however, that not one of these biographies has presented all these data in the proper sequence, beginning with the causes and ending with the consequences in the manner we have done here. Most of the biographers have passed by this matter too quickly and too simplistically. They give the impression that they found the material too rough to handle. Some accounts have pondered the story of the honey and maghafir at length but have omitted to point to the affair of Hafsah and Mariyah. As for the Orientalists, they regard the story of Hafsah and Mariyah and the former’s divulgence to `A’ishah of the secret she promised to keep as the cause of all that had happened. Their purpose is precisely to add to their already alienated readers further occasion to condemn the Arab Prophet by presenting him as a shameless runner after women. It is also my considered opinion that the Muslim historians are not justified in ignoring these incidents, or in omitting to examine all the data available with a view to giving them an objective interpretation. That is what we have sought to do here, though only in part. While the mistake of the Muslim historians was to underestimate the importance of these events, that of the western Orientalists is to exaggerate their importance, to violate historiographic precision, and to vent their Christian prejudice. Genuine historical criticism will not attribute to any man as great as Muhammad such a petty conduct as would be implied by referring his self-imposed exile solely to Hafsah’s divulgence of a domestic secret to `A’ishah. In fact, Muhammad had nothing to hide since the women in question were all his own legitimate wives. Indeed, whatever the nature of that domestic secret, it is too insignificant to cause Muhammad to threaten to divorce all his wives. Genuine historical criticism would also refuse to explain these events as due to the “honey” affair. A man as great, forbearing, and compassionate as Muhammad, as all historians and biographers acknowledge, would not regard such incidents as justifying a whole month’s isolation, let alone divorce. The critical attitude is satisfied only when all these incidents are arranged in such historical sequence as would not violate the causal interrelationships between them. Only such history-writing satisfies the requirements of objectivity and presents its data as elements in factual interrelationships acceptable to reason. The arrangement we have given these events seems to us to have achieved precisely this, and to accord perfectly with what is known of Muhammad’s wisdom, greatness, determination and farsightedness.

Refutation of the Orientalists’ Claim

Referring to some of the verses at the beginning of surah “Al Tahrim” quoted above, some orientalists argue that none of the holy books of the Orient make any mention of domestic problems such as those of Muhammad. I do not think we need to quote here the similar stories and accounts of other scriptures. Suffice it to mention here the People of Lot and their argument with the two angelic visitors of Lot, the story of Lot’s wife and her vagrancies. Indeed, the Torah does tell the story of Lot’s two daughters, of their deliberately intoxicating their father with wine that he might commit incest and save their seed, and how they then suffered the punishment they deserved. We may say that in fact, contrary to the Orientalists claim, all the holy books have told stories about the prophets and have given accounts of what happened to them so that they might serve as examples for the education of mankind. Likewise, the Qur’an tells many stories for the same purpose, stories which God related to His prophets for the best of purposes. The Qur’an was not revealed for Muhammad’s benefit alone but for that of all men. Muhammad is a prophet and a messenger preceded by many prophets and messengers, some of whose tales the Qur’an took upon itself to tell. That the Qur’an should find it fitting to tell some of the stories of Muhammad’s life and to give some account of his biography to provide examples for the education of Muslims, and that it should find it fitting to give aspects of Muhammad’s wise, pious, and virtuous conduct so that the Muslims might find in him an example to emulate, is no different from the contents and purpose of any other holy book. Moreover, what the Qur’an reported about Muhammad is not different in content or purpose from what it reported of the lives of the former prophets. If, therefore, it is now asserted that Muhammad isolated himself from his wives, not for any single reason deducible from that fact, nor for Hafsah’s divulgence to `A’ishah of Muhammad’s legitimate love for Mariyah-a right which belongs to any man toward his free and slave wives-this would not be far from the truth. But it does expose the Orientalists whose claim stands on the shallowest grounds and whose historiography flies in the face of the biographical data common to all holy scriptures.

THE BURNING OF APOSTATES AND HOMOSEXUALS

According to the so-called authentic sources of Sunni Islam, Muhammad’s first cousin, son-in-law and the fourth caliph, Ali ibn Abu Talib would burn apostates alive. Ibn Abbas, who happened to be the cousin of both Muhammad and Ali, objected claiming that killing apostates is the punishment prescribed by Allah, but that one shouldn’t use fire to do so:  

II. The ruling on a male and female apostate and asking them to repent

Ibn ‘Umar, az-Zuhri and Ibrahim said that a female apostate is killed.

Allah Almighty says, “How can Allah guide a people who have become unbelievers after having believed? They bore witness that the Messenger was true and that the Clear Signs had come to them. Allah does not guide people who are wrongdoers. The repayment of such people is that Allah’s curse is on them and that of the angels and of all mankind. They will be under it for ever. Their punishment will not be lightened. They will be granted no reprieve. Except for those who after that repent and put things right. Truly Allah is Ever-Forgiving, Most Merciful. Those who disbelieve after having believed and then increase in their unbelief, their repentance will not be accepted. They are the misguided.” (3:86-90)

“You who believe! if you obey a group of those given the Book, they will make you revert to being unbelievers after you have believed.” (3:100)

He says: “As for those who believe and then return to unbelief, and then again believe and then return to unbelief, and then increase in unbelief, Allah will not forgive them or guide them on any path.” (4:137)

He says, “If any of you renounce your deen, Allah will bring forward a people whom He loves and who love Him, humble to the believers, fierce to the unbelievers.” (5:54)

He says, “But those whose breasts become dilated with unbelief, anger from Allah will come down on them. They will have a terrible punishment. That is because they prefer the life of this world to the Next World, and because Allah does not guide unbelieving people. Those are the people whose hearts, hearing and sight. Allah has sealed up. They are the unaware. There is no doubt that in the Next World they will be the losers.” … to His words .. “your Lord is Ever-Forgiving, Most Merciful.” (16:106-110)

“They will not stop fighting you until they make you revert from your deen, if they are able. As for any of you who revert from their deen and die unbelievers, their actions will come to nothing in this world and the Next World. They are the Companions of the Fire, remaining in it timelessly, for ever.” (2:217)

6524. It is related that ‘Ikrima said, “Some dualists (zindiqs) were brought to ‘Ali and he burned them. Ibn ‘Abbas heard about that and said, ‘If it had been me, I would not have burned them since the Messenger of Allah forbade it, saying: ‘Do not punish with Allah’s punishment.’ I would have killed them based on the words of the Messenger of Allah ‘Kill the one who changes his deen.'” (Aisha Bewley, The Sahih Collection of al-Bukhari, Chapter 91. Book of those of the People of Unbelief and Apostasy who wage war; emphasis mine)

Here’s another rendering of the aforementioned hadith:

88 Apostates

(2) Chapter: Al-Murtad and Al-Murtaddah

Narrated `Ikrima:

Some Zanadiqa (atheists) were brought to `Ali and he burnt them. The news of this event, reached Ibn `Abbas who said, “If I had been in his place, I would not have burnt them, as Allah’s Messenger forbade it, saying, ‘Do not punish anybody with Allah’s punishment (fire).’ I would have killed them according to the statement of Allah’s Messenger, ‘Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him.'”

Reference: Sahih al-Bukhari 6922

In-book reference: Book 88, Hadith 5

USC-MSA web (English) reference: Vol. 9, Book 84, Hadith 57 (sunnah.com https://sunnah.com/bukhari/88/5)

Ikrimah’s report can be found in the major works of hadith in the section dealing with the fate of apostates:

40 Prescribed Punishments (Kitab Al-Hudud)

(1) Chapter: Ruling on one who apostatizes

‘Ikrimah said:

Ali burned some people who retreated from Islam. When Ibn ‘Abbas was informed of it, he said: If it had been I, I would not have burned them, for the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: Do not inflict Allah’s punishment on anyone, but would have had killed them on account of the statement of the Messenger of Allah. The Apostle said: Kill those who change their religion. When ‘Ali was informed about it he said: How truly Ibn ‘Abbas said!

Grade: Sahih (Al-Albani)

Reference: Sunan Abi Dawud 4351

In-book reference: Book 40, Hadith 1

English translation: Book 39, Hadith 4337 (sunnah.com https://sunnah.com/abudawud:4351; emphasis mine)

17 The Book on Legal Punishments (Al-Hudud)

(25) Chapter: What Has Been Related About The Apostate

Narrated ‘Ikrimah:

That ‘Ali burnt some people who apostasized from Islam. This news reached Ibn ‘Abbas, so he said: “If it were me I would have killed them according to the statement of Messenger of Allah. The Messenger of Allah said: ‘Whoever changes his religion then kill him.’ And I would not have burned them because the Messenger of Allah said: ‘Do not punish with the punishment of Allah.’ So this reached ‘Ali, and he said: “Ibn ‘Abbas has told the truth.”

Grade: Sahih (Darussalam)

Reference: Jami` at-Tirmidhi 1458

In-book reference: Book 17, Hadith 42

English translation: Vol. 3, Book 15, Hadith 1458 (suunah.com https://sunnah.com/tirmidhi:1458; emphasis mine)

37 The Book of Fighting [The Prohibition of Bloodshed]

(14) Chapter: The Ruling on Apostates

It was narrated from ‘Ikrimah:

Some people apostatized after accepting Islam, and ‘Ali burned them with fire. Ibn ‘Abbas said: ‘If it had been me, I would not have burned them; the Messenger of Allah said: ‘No one should be punished with the punishment of Allah.’ If it had been me, I would have killed them; the Messenger of Allah said: ‘Whoever changes his religion, kill him.'”

Grade: Sahih (Darussalam)

Reference: Sunan an-Nasa’i 4060

In-book reference: Book 37, Hadith 95

English translation: Vol. 5, Book 37, Hadith 4065 (sunnah.com https://sunnah.com/nasai:4060; emphasis mine)

Here’s one narrated by Anas:

37 The Book of Fighting [The Prohibition of Bloodshed]

(14) Chapter: The Ruling on Apostates

It was narrated from Anas that:

‘Ali came to some people of Az-Zutt, who worshipped idols, and burned them. Ibn ‘Abbas said: “But the Messenger of Allah said: ‘Whoever changes his religion, kill him.'”

Grade: Sahih (Darussalam)

Reference: Sunan an-Nasa’i 4065

In-book reference: Book 37, Hadith 100

English translation: Vol. 5, Book 37, Hadith 4070 (sunnah.com https://sunnah.com/nasai:4065)

Ali also had homosexuals burned alive:

17 Prescribed Punishments

Section 3

Ibn ‘Abbas and Abu Huraira reported God’s Messenger as saying, “Accursed is he who does what Lot’s people did.”

In a version by him on the authority of Ibn ‘Abbas it says that ‘Ali had the two people concerned burned and that Abu Bakr had a wall thrown down on them.

Razin transmitted it.

Reference: Mishkat al-Masabih 3583, 3584

In-book reference: Book 17, Hadith 29 (sunnah.com https://sunnah.com/mishkat:3583; emphasis mine)

The Muslim scholars are divided over the issue of using fire to kill evildoers, with a majority stating that it is permissible to do so in the cases of retaliation, in situations where the enemies are using fire to burn Muslims:

This prohibition on punishing anyone by burning with fire is general in application, but THE MAJORITY OF SCHOLARS made an exception in the case of burning with fire by way of retaliatory punishment (qisaas) and making the punishment fit the crime. If someone burns another person then it is permissible, according to this view, to punish him by burning him, by way of retaliatory punishment. 

They quoted as evidence for that the verses in which Allah, may He be exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning):

“Then whoever transgresses the prohibition against you, you transgress likewise against him. And fear Allah, and know that Allah is with Al-Muttaqoon (the pious)”

[al-Baqarah 2:194]

“And if you punish (your enemy, O you believers in the Oneness of Allah), then punish them with the like of that with which you were afflicted. But if you endure patiently, verily, it is better for As-Sabirin (the patient ones, etc.)”

[an-Nahl 16:126]. 

The basic principle says that acting upon two sound texts that have not been abrogated is better than overlooking one of them. 

For more information, please see fatwa no. 147416 

Therefore THE MAJORITY OF FUQAHA’ think that it is permissible to burn with fire by way of retaliatory punishment. 

Ibn Mulaqqin said: 

One group of scholars said: Whoever burns is to be burnt. This is also the view OF MAALIK, THE SCHOLARS OF MADINAH, ASH-SHAAFA‘I and his companions, AHMAD and Ishaaq

End quote from at-Tawdeeh li Sharh al-Jaami‘ as-Saheeh (18/61) (Islam Question & Answer, No. 227776: Why did the Sahaabah use burning with fire as a punishment for some crimes? https://islamqa.info/en/answers/227776/why-did-the-sahaabah-use-burning-with-fire-as-a-punishment-for-some-crimes; bold and capital emphasis mine)

FURTHER READING

MUHAMMAD’S BARBARIC AND BRUTAL MURDERS

THE NOT SO MIRACULOUS AND PERFECTLY PRESERVED QURAN

The following excerpt is taken from Qadi ‘Iyad Ibn Musa al-Yahsubi’s Kitab Ash-shifa bi ta’rif huquq al-Mustafa (Healing by the recognition of the Rights of the Chosen One), translated by Aisha Abdarrahman Bewley (Madinah Press, Inverness, Scotland, U.K.; third reprint 1991, paperback), PART THREE. On what is necessary for the Prophet and what is impossible for him, what is permitted for him and what is forbidden for him and what is valid in those human matters which can be ascribed to him, Chapter One. CONCERNING MATTERS OF THE DEEN AND THE PROPHET’S BEING PROTECTED FROM IMPERFECTION.

This section from the Qadi’s work will highlight the fact that the Quran is an imperfect, incoherent and unintelligible compilation that is riddled with variant readings, which left the Muslims baffled and confused. All emphasis will be mine.

SECTION 16

On the protection of the angels from wrong action

The Muslims agree that the judgement concerning the Messengers among the angels is the same as that for the Prophets and that they are protected from the same things that the Prophets are protected from. The angels are like the Prophets with their communities in respect of the duties they have with regard to conveying revelation to the Prophets.

The ‘ulama’ disagree about angels other than the Messengers among them. One group believes that all of them are protected from acts of rebellion and they use as a proof Allah’s words, “They do not disobey Allah in what He orders them and carry out what they are ordered to do” (66:6); “There is not one of us who does not have a known station. We are those drawn up in ranks. We are those who glorify” (37: 165-166); “Those in His presence do not consider themselves too great to worship Him and do not grow tired of it. They glorify Him by night and day, without ever flagging” (21: 19-20); “Those who are with your Lord do not consider themselves too great to worship Him” (7:206); “Noble, virtuous” (80:16); and “No one may touch it except the purified,” (56:79) and similar reports.

Another group believe that these are special qualities restricted to the angels who are Messengers and those among them who are brought near to Allah. They take as a proof things which the people of reports and commentaries mention which we will mention later, clarifying their position if Allah wills.

The correct position is that all of them are protected and their high rank is free from anything that might lower their rank and station from the sublimity of their high degree. One of our shaykhs indicated that there is no need for any faqih to involve himself in discussing their protection. I say that any discussion concerning this matter must be based on what has been said regarding the protection of Prophets in respect of the benefits which we have mentioned – except for the benefit of words and actions which must be omitted in this instance.

Something that those who do not consider it necessary for all angels to be protected use as a proof, is what is said in the traditions and commentaries regarding the story of Harut and Marut1 and what ‘Ali and Ibn ‘Abbas related about them and their temptation. You should know that these reports do not relate anything, either weak or sound, from the Messenger of Allah himself and there is nothing which is taken by analogy. The commentators disagree about the meaning of what the Qur’an says about them.

What one of them stated was rejected by many of the Salaf as we will show. These reports are taken from the books of the Jews and from their fabrications. What Allah told us about at the beginning of the passage concerned their forging lies like that against Sulayman and their declaring him to be an unbeliever. That story contains an immense atrocity. We will deal with that by removing the cover from these ambiguities, Allah willing.

Scholars disagree about whether Harut and Marut were angels or men and whether they are meant as “two angels.” Is the recitation truly “two ANGELS (malakayn)”2 or is it “two KINGS (malikayn)”?3

Are Allah’s words “What was sent down” or are they “It was NOT sent down (ma unzila)”? Is “They do not teach anyone”4 negative or affirmative?

Most of the commentators believe that Allah tested people by the two angels who instructed them in magic, making it clear that the use5 of magic amounts to disbelief. Whoever learns it disbelieves and whoever leaves it believes.6

Allah quotes them as saying, “We are merely a trial and temptation, so do not disbelieve.” (2:102) They taught magic to people with a warning, i.e. they told those who came to learn it, “Do not do it. It parts a man and his wife. Do not suppose that it is good. It is magic, so do not disbelieve.”

According to this interpretation, what the two angels did was an act of obedience and they acted as Allah had commanded them. It was not rebellion. It was a trial for others.

Ibn Wahb has related that Khalid ibn Abi ‘Imran mentioned Harut and Marut as teaching magic. Ibn Wahb added, “We absolve them of this.” One of the scholars recited the verse as meaning, “It was NOT sent down on the two angels.” (2:102) Khalid took this position and he possessed both esteem and knowledge. He absolved them even from teaching the magic which other scholars said that they had permission to teach provided that they made it clear that it was disbelief and a test and trial from Allah. How is it possible to do anything other than absolve them from all major wrong actions, acts of rebellion and the disbelief mentioned in these traditions? Khalid, as well as Ibn ‘Abbas, said that the verse is a negative statement.

Makki said that the implication of the words, “Sulayman did not disbelieve,” means that he did not disbelieve by believing the magic which the shaytans fabricated against him and which the Jews followed and he said that the two angels were Jibril and Mika’il.

The Jews allege that the two angels did that, just as they also claim that Sulayman used magic. Allah calls them liars: “But the shaytans disbelieved and taught people magic, and what had been sent down on the two angels/kings at Bablyon, Harut and Marut.” (2:102) It is said that they were two men who disbelieved. As-Sakan said that Harut and Marut were two infidels from the people of Babel. He must have recited “What was sent down on the two kings” by this interpretation. ‘Abdu’r-Rahman ibn Abza said that the two kings were Da’ud and Sulayman. As-Samarqandi said that they were two kings from the tribe of Isra‘il whom Allah transformed. The recitation as “malikayn (two kings)”, however, is rare.

The interpretation of the ayat according to the evaluation of Abu Muhammad Makki is good. It absolves the angels and removes impurity from them and considers them absolutely pure. Allah described them as being purified and “Noble, virtuous.” (80:16) “They do not disobey Allah in what He orders them and carry out what they are ordered to do.” (66:6)

Another thing that is brought up by people is the story of Iblis being a leader of the angels and one of the guardians of the Garden, however, Allah made him an exception among the angels when He said, “They prostrated except for Iblis.” (2:24)

This is also a subject of disagreement. Most deny that he was an angel and say that he was Abu’l-Jinn (father of the jinn) as Adam was Abu’l-Ins (the father of men). That is what al-Hasan, Qatada and Ibn Zayd said. Shihr ibn Hawshab said that he was one of the jinn whom the angels threw to earth when the jinn became corrupt. Making an exception outside the general category being referred to is common and allowed in the Arabic language.

Allah says, They have no real knowledge of it, just conjecture.” (4:157) Another thing related in the traditions7 is that some of the angels rebelled against Allah and were burned. They were commanded to prostrate to Adam and refused, so they were burned. Sound traditions refute this, so it is not to be given any consideration. Allah knows best.

1. See Qur’an 2:102.

2. As is found in the Seven Readings of the Qur’an.

3. As found in a rare reading from al-Hasan al-Basri and others.

4. This could also be taken to be “What they teach to anyone.”

5. One text has “the knowledge”.

6. This is the position of Malik and Ibn Hanbal. Ash-Shafi‘i considers it to be a major wrong action.

7. Ibn Jarir from Ibn ‘Abbas and Ibn Abi Hatim from Yahya ibn Kathir.

Note the mass confusion surrounding the correct reading and interpretation of Q. 2:102.

Are Harut and Marut two righteous angels or two disbelieving kings?

Did they come down with the knowledge of magic which they would use to tempt mankind?

Or were they not sent down with magic at all, but were falsely accused of such?

And do all the angels have the power to disobey and rebel? Or are they incapable of disobeying Allah? Or is this true for only some of the angels, particularly those who are nearest to Allah and those chosen to be messengers sent down to mankind?

So much for the Quran being a perfectly coherent and miraculously structured revelation.

FURTHER READING

A QURANIC VARIANT THAT MAKES A DIFFERENCE

A QURANIC VARIANT THAT MAKES A DIFFERENCE PT. 2

A QURANIC VARIANT THAT MAKES A DIFFERENCE PT. 3

 Qur’an contradiction: Can Angels Disobey? [1][2][3]

ISLAMIC GRAVE WORSHIP REVISTED

The following excerpt is taken from Qadi ‘Iyad Ibn Musa al-Yahsubi’s Kitab Ash-shifa bi ta’rif huquq al-Mustafa (Healing by the recognition of the Rights of the Chosen One), translated by Aisha Abdarrahman Bewley (Madinah Press, Inverness, Scotland, U.K.; third reprint 1991, paperback), PART TWO. Concerning the rights which people owe the Prophet, Chapter 4. THE PRAYER ON THE PROPHET AND ASKING PEACE FOR HIM AND THE OBLIGATION OF DOING IT AND ITS EXCELLENCE.

What I am about to quote will prove that Muslims are Muhammadan grave worshipers for visiting Muhammad’s dead body in order to greet and pray for/to him. All emphasis will be mine.

SECTION 9

Concerning the visit to the Prophet’s grave, the excellence of those who visit it and how he should be greeted

Visiting his grave is part of the Sunna and is both excellent and desirable. Ibn ‘Umar said that the Prophet said, “My intercession is assured for all who visit me.”1

Anas ibn Malik said that the Messenger of Allah said, “Anyone who visits me in Madina for the sake of Allah is near me and I will intercede for him on the Day of Rising.”2

He said, “Whoever visits me after my death, it is as if he visited me while I was alive.”3

Malik disliked people saying, “We visited the grave of the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace.” People have disagreed about the meaning of this statement. It is said that he disliked it because of the Prophet’s saying, “Allah curses women who visit graves.”4 People relate that the Prophet then said, “I forbade you to visit the graves, but now you can visit them.”5

The Prophet said, “Anyone who visits my grave…” and used the word “visit”. It is said that this is because the visitor is considered to be better than the one visited. This has no foundation since not every visitor has this quality and so it is not a universal principle. The hadith concerning the People of the Garden talks about their “visit” to their Lord, so it is not forbidden to use this expression in respect of Allah.

Abu ‘Imran al-Fasi said, “Malik disliked anyone saying, ‘the tawaf of the visit’, or, ‘we visited the grave of the Prophet’, because people normally use that for visits between themselves, and he did not like to put the Prophet on the same level as other people. He preferred a specific statement like ‘We greeted the Prophet.’”

Moreover, it is merely recommended for people to visit each other whereas there is a strong obligation to visit the grave of the Prophet. “Obligation” here means the recommendation and encouragement to do that, not the obligation that is a legal duty.

I think the best interpretation is that Malik forbade and disliked the practice of connecting the word “grave” with the Prophet. He did not dislike people saying, “We visited the Prophet.” This is because of the Prophet’s statement, “O Allah, do not make my grave an idol to be worshipped after me. Allah was very angry with people who took the graves of their prophets as mosques.” So he omitted the word “grave” in order to cut off the means and close the door to this wrong action. Allah knows best.

Ishaq ibn Ibrahim, the faqih, said that when someone goes on hajj, he should go to Madina with the intention of praying in the mosque of the Messenger of Allah, seeking the blessing of seeing his Meadow,6 his minbar, his grave, the place where he sat, the places his hands touched and the places where his feet walked and the post on which he used to lean, where Jibril descended to him with the revelation, and the places connected with the Companions and the Imams of the Muslims who lived there. He should have consideration for all these things.

Ibn Abi Fudayk said that he heard someone state, “We have heard that all who stop at the Prophet’s grave should recite the ayat, ‘Allah and His angels bless the Prophet,’ (33:56) and then say, ‘May Allah bless you, Muhammad.’ If someone says this seventy times, an angel will call to him, ‘May Allah bless you!’ and all his needs will be taken care of.”

Yazid ibn Abi Sa‘id al-Mahri said that he went to ‘Umar ibn ‘Abdu’l-‘Aziz and when ‘Umar bade him farewell, he said, “I would like you to do something for me. When you reach Madina and see the grave of the Prophet greet him for me with peace.” Another said, “He used to send such greetings in his letters from Syria.”

One of the early Muslims said, “I saw Anas ibn Malik come to the Prophet’s grave. He stopped and raised his hands so that I thought he was beginning the prayer. He greeted the Prophet and then left.”

Ibn Wahb said that Malik said that when someone greets the Prophet, and makes supplication, he should stand with his face towards the grave, not towards qibla, draw near and greet him but not touch the grave with his hands. In Al-Mabsut, Malik says, “I do not think people should stand at the grave of the Prophet but should greet and then depart.”

Ibn Abi Mulayka said, “Anyone who wants to stand and face the Prophet should face the lamp which is in the qibla end of the grave at the Prophet’s head.”

Nafi‘ said, “Ibn ‘Umar used to make the greeting at the grave. I saw him come to the grave a hundred times or more. He would say, ‘Peace be upon the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace. Peace be upon Abu Bakr.’” Then he would leave. Ibn ‘Umar was also seen to put his hand on the seat of the Prophet at the minbar and then place his hand on his face.

Ibn Qusayt and al-‘Utbi said, “When the mosque was empty, the Companions of the Prophet used to touch the knob of the minbar which was near the grave with their right hands. Then they faced to the qibla and made supplication.”

In the Muwatta’ we find that Malik, according to the transmission of Yahya ibn al-Laythi, used to stand at the grave of the Prophet and would pray on the Prophet, Abu Bakr and ‘Umar. According to Ibn al-Qasim and al-Qa‘nabi, he made supplication for Abu Bakr and ‘Umar. According to Ibn Wahb, Malik said that the greeter should say, “Peace be upon you, O Prophet, and the mercy of Allah and His blessings.” In al-Mabsut, he greeted Abu Bakr and ‘Umar.

Qadi Abu’l-Walid al-Baji said, “I think that he should supplicate for the Prophet using the term ‘salat’ and use a different word for Abu Bakr and ‘Umar as Ibn ‘Umar indicated.”

Ibn Habib said, “When you enter the Prophet’s mosque, you should say, ‘In the name of Allah and peace be upon the Messenger of Allah. Peace be upon us from our Lord. Allah and His angels bless Muhammad. O Allah, forgive us our wrong actions and open for us the gates of Your mercy and Your Garden and preserve us from the accursed shaytan!’

“Then you should go to the Meadow which is that part of the mosque between the grave and the minbar. Pray two rak‘ats there in which you praise Allah before standing at the grave. Ask Him for the complete fulfillment of the intention which brought you out to visit him and for help in realising it. If your two rak‘ats are outside the Rawda, that is sufficient although it is better if they are in the Rawda. The Prophet said, ‘The area between my house and the minbar is one of the meadows (rawdas) of the Garden. My minbar is on one of the raised gardens of the Garden.’

Then you stand at the grave with humility and respect, and bless him and give what praise you can. You greet Abu Bakr and ‘Umar and make supplication for them and do a lot of prayer in the mosque of the Prophet night and day. Do not forget to go to the mosque of Quba’ and the graves of the martyrs.”

Malik said in his letter to Muhammad,7The Prophet should be greeted when you enter and leave (i.e. the Prophet’s mosque).” Muhammad said, “When you leave the mosque, finish your time there standing at the grave. It is the same when you want to leave Madina.”

Ibn Wahb relates that Fatima said that the Prophet said, “When you enter the mosque, bless the Prophet, and say, ‘O Allah, forgive me my wrong actions and open the doors of Your mercy to me.’ When you leave, bless the Prophet, and say, ‘O Allah, forgive me my wrong actions and open the doors of Your overflowing favour to me.’”8

Muhammad ibn Sirin said, “When people entered the mosque, they used to say, ‘May Allah and His angels bless Muhammad. Peace be upon you, O Prophet, and the mercy of Allah and His blessings. In the name of Allah we have entered and in the name of Allah we have gone out. We have relied on Allah.’ They said something similar when they went out.”

When the Messenger of Allah entered the mosque, he used to say, “O Allah, open the doors of Your mercy to me and make the gates of Your provision easy for me.”

Abu Hurayra said, “When one of you enters the mosque, let him pray on the Prophet and say, ‘Allah, open the way for me!’”

In al-Mabsut, Malik said, “It is not necessary for the people of Madina who enter and leave the mosque to stand at the grave. That is for strangers.”

Malik also said, “There is no harm in someone who comes from a journey or leaves on a journey standing at the grave of the Prophet and asking for blessing on him and making supplication for him and for Abu Bakr and ‘Umar.” He was told that some of the people of Madina who had neither come from a journey nor were going on a journey would do that once a day or more, sometimes once or twice on Jumu‘a or other days, giving the greeting and making supplication for an hour. Malik said, “I have not heard this mentioned by any of the people of fiqh in our city. It is permitted to abandon it. The last people of this community are only put right by the first, and I have not heard of the first people of this community or any of the Salaf doing that. It is disliked except for someone who has come from or is going on a journey.”

Ibn al-Qasim said, “When the people of Madina left or entered Madina, I saw that they used to come to the grave and give the greeting.” He said, “That is what is considered to be the correct thing to do.”

Al-Baji said, “There is a difference between the people of Madina and strangers because strangers have a specific intention for doing so whereas the Madinans live there and do not intend to go there for the sake of the grave and the greeting.”

In the Book of Ahmad ibn Sa‘id al-Hindi about people standing at the grave we find, “Do not cling to it and do not touch it and do not stand at it for a long time.”

In the ‘Utibiyya we find, “In the mosque of the Prophet begin with the prayer on the Prophet which you say before the salam.

“The best place for nafila prayers in the mosque of the Prophet is in the prayer-place of the Prophet where the post scented with khaluq perfume is located. In the obligatory prayer, it is best to go to the front rows. I prefer strangers to do the nafila prayers there rather than in their houses.”

1. Ibn Khuzayma, al-Bazzar and at-Tabarani.

2. Al-Bayhaqi and others.

3. Al-Bayhaqi.

4. Ibn Hanbal, at-Tirmidhi and Ibn Hibban from Abu Hurayra.

5. Muslim from Burayda.

6. An area of the Prophet’s Mosque between his tomb and the minbar called the Rawda.

7. One of the companions of Malik, possibly Muhammad ibn al-Hasan ash-Shaybani who was also one of the companions of Abu Hanifa.

8. In the Sunan Collections.

FURTHER READING

Grave Worship: More of Muhammad’s Duplicity Exposed