Category: Uncategorized

CHRIST: THE OFFSPRING OF CREATION?

In writing to the Church at Colossae, St. Paul includes what scholars believe to be an early hymn that emphasizes the work of Christ in creation and redemption:  

“Who rescued us from the authority of darkness, and transferred us to the kingdom of the Son of His love, in whom we have redemption, the forgiveness of sins. Who is the image of the invisible God, THE FIRSTBORN OF ALL CREATION. For IN Him all things were created, both in the heavens and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities—all things have been created through Him and FOR Him. And He IS before all things, And IN Him all things hold together. And He is the head of the body, the church; Who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead, so that He Himself will come to have first place in everything. For in Him all the fullness of God was pleased to dwell, And through Him to reconcile all things to Himself, having made peace through the blood of His cross—through Him—whether things on earth or things in heaven.” Colossians 1:13-20

Suffice it to say, anti-Trinitarians have jumped upon this passage as a prooftext that Christ cannot be God. They argue that this hymn proves that Christ is the first creature that God brought into being.

They base this on the phrase “firstborn of all creation,” which these heretics interpret to mean the first part of creation which God made.

In this post I will show why the expression “firstborn of” cannot possibly mean that Christ is the first creature that God brought into existence. I will highlight the fact that when this phrase is used elsewhere in the God-breathed Scriptures it refers to the first offspring produced or begotten by the particular thing, individual, nation, group etc., which that specific individual/thing is said to be the firstborn of. I will then demonstrate from these cases the utter futility of assuming that the expression “firstborn of all creation” means that Jesus is the first creation of God.  

With the foregoing in perspective here are the places where “firstborn of” appears throughout the Hebrew Bible:

“Abel, on his part, also brought of the firstborn of his flock and of their fat portions. And Yahweh had regard for Abel and for his offering;” Genesis 4:4  

“and these are the names of the sons of Ishmael, by their names, in the order of their birth: Nebaioth, the firstborn of Ishmael, and Kedar and Adbeel and Mibsam” Genesis 25:13  

“These are their generations: the firstborn of Ishmael was Nebaioth, then Kedar, Adbeel, Mibsam,” 1 Chronicles 1:29

“These are the chiefs of the sons of Esau. The sons of Eliphaz, the firstborn of Esau, are chief Teman, chief Omar, chief Zepho, chief Kenaz,” Genesis 36:15

“and all the firstborn in the land of Egypt shall die, from the firstborn of the Pharaoh who sits on his throne, even to the firstborn of the servant-girl who is behind the millstones; and all the firstborn of the cattle.” Exodus 11:5

“Now it happened at midnight that Yahweh struck all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, from the firstborn of Pharaoh who sat on his throne to the firstborn of the captive who was in the dungeon, and all the firstborn of cattle.” Exodus 12:29  

“He struck the firstborn of Egypt, From man to beast.” Psalm 135:8

“To Him who struck the Egyptians through their firstborn, For His lovingkindness endures forever,” Psalm 136:10

“But every first offspring of a donkey you shall redeem with a lamb, but if you do not redeem it, then you shall break its neck; and every firstborn of man among your sons you shall redeem… And it happened, when Pharaoh hardened his heart with stiffness about letting us go, that Yahweh killed every firstborn in the land of Egypt, both the firstborn of man and the firstborn of beast. Therefore, I sacrifice to Yahweh the males, the first offspring of every womb, but every firstborn of my sons I redeem.” Exodus 13:13, 15  

“You shall not delay the offering from the fullness of your harvest and the juice of your wine vat. The firstborn of your sons you shall give to Me.” Exodus 22:29  

“And you shall redeem with a lamb the first offspring from a donkey; and if you do not redeem it, then you shall break its neck. You shall redeem all the firstborn of your sons. None shall appear before Me empty-handed.” Exodus 34:20

“For the redemption price of the 273 of the firstborn of the sons of Israel who are in excess beyond the Levites… from the firstborn of the sons of Israel he took the money in terms of the shekel of the sanctuary, 1,365.” Numbers 3:46, 50  

“for they are wholly given to Me from among the sons of Israel. I have taken them for Myself instead of every first issue of the womb, the firstborn of all the sons of Israel.” Numbers 8:16

“Every first issue of the womb of all flesh, whether man or animal, which they bring near to Yahweh, shall be yours; nevertheless the firstborn of man you shall surely redeem, and the firstborn of unclean animals you shall redeem… But the firstborn of an ox or the firstborn of a sheep or the firstborn of a goat, you shall not redeem; they are holy. You shall splash their blood on the altar and shall offer up their fat in smoke as an offering by fire, for a soothing aroma to Yahweh.” Numbers 18:15, 17

“And there you shall bring your burnt offerings, your sacrifices, your tithes, the contribution of your hand, your votive offerings, your freewill offerings, and the firstborn of your herd and of your flock.” Deuteronomy 12:6

“You are not allowed to eat within your gates the tithe of your grain or new wine or oil, or the firstborn of your herd or flock, or any of your votive offerings which you vow, or your freewill offerings, or the contribution of your hand.” Deuteronomy 12:17

“And you shall eat in the presence of Yahweh your God, at the place where He chooses for His name to dwell, the tithe of your grain, your new wine, your oil, and the firstborn of your herd and your flock, so that you may learn to fear Yahweh your God all your days.” Deuteronomy 14:23  

“You shall set apart as holy to Yahweh your God all the firstborn males that are born of your herd and of your flock; you shall not work with the firstborn of your herd nor shear the firstborn of your flock.” Deuteronomy 15:19

“Manasseh’s Inheritance And this was the lot for the tribe of Manasseh, for he was the firstborn of Joseph. To Machir the firstborn of Manasseh, the father of Gilead, were allotted Gilead and Bashan, because he was a man of war.” Joshua 17:1  

“And the sons of Jerahmeel the firstborn of Hezron were Ram the firstborn, then Bunah, Oren, Ozem, and Ahijah… The sons of Ram, the firstborn of Jerahmeel, were Maaz, Jamin, and Eker.” 1 Chronicles 2:25, 27

“These were the sons of Caleb. The sons of Hur, the firstborn of Ephrathah, were Shobal the father of Kiriath-jearim,” 1 Chronicles 2:50  

“Penuel was the father of Gedor, and Ezer the father of Hushah. These were the sons of Hur, the firstborn of Ephrathah, the father of Bethlehem.” 1 Chronicles 4:4  

“And Mattithiah, one of the Levites, who was the firstborn of Shallum the Korahite, had the office of trust over the things which were baked in pans.” 1 Chronicles 9:31

“and to bring to the house of our God the firstborn of our sons and of our cattle, and the firstborn of our herds and our flocks as it is written in the law, for the priests who are ministering in the house of our God.” Nehemiah 10:36

Finally:

“Sons of Reuben Now the sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel (for he was the firstborn, but because he profaned his father’s bed, his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph the son of Israel; so that he is not recorded in the genealogy according to the birthright. Though Judah prevailed over his brothers, and from him came the ruler, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph), the sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel were Hanoch and Pallu, Hezron and Carmi.” 1 Chronicles 5:1-3(1)

THE ARIAN/UNITARIAN DILEMMA

The foregoing references show that the expression “firstborn of” refers to the first offspring produced by the thing or individual which/who it is said to be the firstborn of. I.e., the firstborn of Pharaoh means the first son that Pharaoh sired. The firstborn of Jacob/Israel refers to the first child that Jacob begot.   

Therefore, if we were to take the phrase “firstborn of all creation” literally then this would mean that creation produced or brought Christ into being. In other words, it wasn’t Christ who brought all creation into existence, but rather it was creation itself that produced him as its first creature!

After all, the hymn doesn’t say Jesus is the firstborn of God (and even that wouldn’t necessarily mean the very first thing God created). Rather, it describes Christ as the firstborn OF all creation.

As such, in light of the pattern of how the phrase “firstborn of” is employed throughout Holy Scripture, the Arians/Unitarians would have to conclude that instead of God creating Jesus, it was actually creation which produced/begot Christ as the first created thing!

Obviously, this is a nonsensical interpretation and only goes to show the utter desperation of the Arian/Unitarian heretics in trying to force the phrase to mean that God created Jesus as the first part of his creation, with every other creating thing coming into existence immediately thereafter.

The fact is that the hymn is describing Jesus as the firstborn not in the sense of God having created him first. Rather, as the context itself shows God’s beloved Son is the firstborn of creation in terms of his being preeminent/supreme/transcendent over all creation by virtue of his having created and actively sustaining all things for his very own possession.

And since Christ created the entire creation to be his inheritance this then explains why he is the One who came into the world to redeem it by the blood of his cross. I.e., the One who created and sustains all creation is the very One who then came to reconcile all things to himself.

The following translations do an excellent job of capturing the intended meaning of the hymn:

“Christ is the exact likeness of the unseen God. He existed before God made anything at all, and, in fact, Christ himself is the Creator who made everything in heaven and earth, the things we can see and the things we can’t; the spirit world with its kings and kingdoms, its rulers and authorities; all were made by Christ for his own use and glory. He was before all else began and it is his power that holds everything together. He is the Head of the body made up of his people—that is, his Church—which he began; and he is the Leader of all those who arise from the dead, so that he is first in everything; for God wanted all of himself to be in his Son. It was through what his Son did that God cleared a path for everything to come to him—all things in heaven and on earth—for Christ’s death on the cross has made peace with God for all by his blood.’” Colossians 1:15-20 Living Bible (TLB)

“Christ is the visible image of the invisible God. He existed before anything was created and is supreme over all creation, for through him God created everything in the heavenly realms and on earth. He made the things we can see and the things we can’t see— such as thrones, kingdoms, rulers, and authorities in the unseen world. Everything was created through him and FOR HIM. He existed before anything else, and he holds all creation together. Christ is also the head of the church, which is his body. He is the beginning, supreme over all who rise from the dead. So he is first in everything. For God in all his fullness was pleased to live in Christ, and through him God reconciled everything to himself. He made peace with everything in heaven and on earth by means of Christ’s blood on the cross.” New Living Translation (NLT)

Unless stated otherwise, scriptural references taken from the Legacy Standard Bible (LSB).

FURTHER READING

JESUS CHRIST: SUPREME OVER ALL CREATION

Jesus Christ: The Eternal Maker of all Creation

THE NWT TESTIFIES THAT THE TRINITY IS THE ETERNAL CREATOR!

Jesus as the First Creature and the Irrationality of Arianism

ENDNOTES

(1) 1 Chronicles 5:1-3 is rather interesting since here we see the expression firstborn being used in two different senses. In respect to Reuben, firstborn refers to his being the first child begotten by Jacob. Yet in regards to Joseph, he is given the status of firstborn in that he, not Reuben, was designated the heir of Jacob who was given preeminence over the rest of his siblings, despite his being the eleventh son sired by Israel.

This is in fulfilment of Joseph’s dreams where he saw his siblings bowing to him in recognition of his being made ruler over them:

“Then Joseph had a dream, and he told it to his brothers; so they hated him even more. And he said to them, ‘Please listen to this dream which I have had: Indeed, behold, we were binding sheaves in the field, and behold, my sheaf rose up and also stood upright; and behold, your sheaves gathered around and bowed down to my sheaf.’ Then his brothers said to him, ‘Are you really going to reign over us? Or are you really going to rule over us?’ So they hated him even more for his dreams and for his words. Then he had still another dream and recounted it to his brothers and said, ‘Behold, I have had still another dream; and behold, the sun and the moon and eleven stars were bowing down to me.’ And he recounted it to his father and to his brothers; and his father rebuked him and said to him, ‘What is this dream that you have had? Shall I and your mother and your brothers really come to bow ourselves down before you to the ground?’ And his brothers were jealous of him, but his father kept the saying in mind.” Genesis 37:5-11

“Then Joseph took them from his knees and bowed with his face to the ground. And Joseph took them both, Ephraim with his right hand toward Israel’s left, and Manasseh with his left hand toward Israel’s right, and brought them close to him. But Israel stretched out his right hand and laid it on the head of Ephraim, who was the younger, and his left hand on Manasseh’s head, crossing his hands, although Manasseh was the firstborn. And he blessed Joseph and said, ‘May the God before whom my fathers Abraham and Isaac walked, The God who has been my shepherd throughout my life to this day, The angel who has redeemed me from all evil, Bless these boys; And may my name live on in them, And the names of my fathers Abraham and Isaac; And may they grow into a multitude in the midst of the earth.’ But Joseph saw that his father set his right hand on Ephraim’s head, and it was displeasing in his sight; so he took hold of his father’s hand to remove it from Ephraim’s head to Manasseh’s head. And Joseph said to his father, ‘Not so, my father, for this one is the firstborn. Place your right hand on his head.’ But his father refused and said, ‘I know, my son, I know; he also will become a people, and he also will be great. However, his younger brother shall be greater than he, and his seed shall become the fullness of nations.’ And he blessed them that day, saying, ‘By you Israel will pronounce blessing, saying, “May God make you like Ephraim and Manasseh!”’ Thus he put Ephraim before Manasseh. Then Israel said to Joseph, ‘Behold, I am about to die, but God will be with you and will bring you back to the land of your fathers. And I give you one portion more than your brothers, which I took from the hand of the Amorite with my sword and my bow.’” Genesis 48:12-22  

“Then Joseph came home, and they brought into the house to him the present which was in their hand and bowed to the ground before him. And he asked them about their well-being and said, ‘Is your old father well, of whom you spoke? Is he still alive?’ And they said, ‘Your servant our father is well; he is still alive.’ They bowed down and prostrated themselves. Then he lifted his eyes and saw his brother Benjamin, his mother’s son. And he said, ‘Is this your youngest brother, of whom you spoke to me?’ And he said, ‘May God be gracious to you, my son.’And Joseph hurried out for he was deeply stirred with compassion over his brother, and he sought a place to weep; and he entered his chamber and wept there. Then he washed his face and came out; and he restrained himself and said, ‘Set the meal.’So they set the meal for him by himself, and for them by themselves, and for the Egyptians who ate with him by themselves, because the Egyptians could not eat bread with the Hebrews, for that is an abomination to the Egyptians. And they were seated before him, the firstborn according to his birthright and the youngest according to his youth, and the men looked at one another in astonishment. And he took portions to them from his own table, but Benjamin’s portion was five times greater than any of theirs. So they feasted and drank freely with him.” Genesis 43:26-34

“Then Joseph’s brothers saw that their father was dead, and they said, ‘What if Joseph bears a grudge against us and returns back to us all the evil which we dealt against him!’So they sent a message to Joseph, saying, ‘Your father commanded before he died, saying, “Thus you shall say to Joseph, ‘Please forgive, I beg you, the transgression of your brothers and their sin, for they dealt evil against you.’” So now, please forgive the transgression of the slaves of the God of your father.’ And Joseph wept when they spoke to him. Then his brothers also came and fell down before him and said, ‘Behold, we are your slaves.’But Joseph said to them, ‘Do not be afraid, for am I in God’s place? As for you, you meant evil against me, but God meant it for good in order to do what has happened on this day, to keep many people alive. So now, do not be afraid; I will provide for you and your little ones.’ And he comforted them and spoke to their heart.” Genesis 50:15-21

“God had singled out Joseph to be the one “Of Joseph he said, ‘Blessed of Yahweh be his land, With the choice things of heaven, with the dew, And with the choice produce of the sun, And with the choice yield of the months, And with the best things of the ancient mountains, And with the choice things of the everlasting hills, And with the choice things of the earth and its fullness, And the favor of Him who dwelt in the bush. Let it come to the head of Joseph, And to the top of the head of the one distinguished among his brothers. As the firstborn of his ox, splendor is his, And his horns are the horns of the wild ox; With them he will push the peoples, All at once, to the ends of the earth. And those are the ten thousands of Ephraim, And those are the thousands of Manasseh.’” Deuteronomy 33:13-17  

The foregoing illustrates the fact that the expression “firstborn” doesn’t always or necessarily refer to the first one born. The phrase is used to emphasize the preeminence and inheritance assigned to a specific individual without any connotation of origin or birth.

This brings me to my two final examples.

The firstborn of death eats parts of his skin; It eats parts of him.” Job 18:13  

“The firstborn of death” isn’t speaking of death literally having an offspring but rather refers to the deadliest or worst of diseases, which is how certain translations render the phrase:   

“By disease his strength and his skin shall be devoured; the firstborn of death [the worst of diseases] shall consume his limbs.” Amplified Bible, Classic Edition (AMPC)

“It eats away parts of his skin; the most terrible death devours his limbs.”

tn The “firstborn of death” is the strongest child of death (Gen 49:3), or the deadliest death (like the “firstborn of the poor, the poorest”). The phrase means the most terrible death (A. B. Davidson, Job, 134). New English Translation (NET https://netbible.org/bible/Job+18; emphasis mine)

Here’s the final text:

“And the firstborn of the poor will graze, and the needy lie down in safety; but I will kill your root with famine, and your remnant it will slay.” Isaiah 14:30 English Standard Version (ESV)

Here the term “firstborn of the poor” is not a reference to the first child born to a poor individual. As the NET note cited above indicates, the phrase is used in relation to the poorest of the poor.

The following versions help capture the intended meaning of this verse:    

The poorest of the poor will find pasture…” New International Version (NIV)

“And the foremost of the poor will eat…”

The previous two verses show that there are places in which firstborn stresses the preeminence, supremacy and/or transcendence of a thing or person. In such cases, the phrase isn’t even addressing birth whatsoever such as what we find in the following example of David:

“Formerly You spoke in vision to Your holy ones, And said, ‘I have bestowed help to a mighty one; I have exalted one chosen from the people. I have found David My servant; With My holy oil I have anointed him… He will call to Me, “You are my Father, My God, and the rock of my salvation.” I also shall make him My firstborn, The HIGHEST of the kings of the earth.’” Psalm 89:19-20, 26-27

David wasn’t the first Israelite king, nor was he the firstborn since he was the youngest of Jesse’s eight sons (cf. 1 Samuel 16:1-13; 17:12-15; 1 Chronicles 2:12-16). As the passage itself stresses, David is God’s firstborn in the sense of his being preeminent over all the other kings of the nations.

Once again, the stress is on preeminence and supremacy, not on birth. Such is the case with Colossians 1:13-20 which emphasizes Christ’s supremacy over all creation in virtue of his creating, actively sustaining, personally redeeming and sovereignly ruling over all things.

JUSTIN MARTYR’S CHRISTOLOGY REVISITED

In this post I am going to revisit what the second century apologist Justin Martyr wrote in respect to Christ’s Deity. I want to focus on Justin’s statements where he emphatically identifies the prehuman Jesus as that very YHWH God who appeared to the OT saints. This will help solidify the fact that Justin did not think that Christ was a creature whom the Father brought into being.

I cite from the following section of Justin Martyr’s Dialogue with Trypho Chapters 55-68. All emphasis will be mine.

Chapter 55. Trypho asks that Christ be proved God, but without metaphor. Justin promises to do so

Trypho: We shall remember this your exposition, if you strengthen [your solution of] this difficulty by other arguments: but now resume the discourse, and show us that the Spirit of prophecy admits another God besides the Maker of all things, taking care not to speak of the sun and moon, which, it is written, God has given to the nations to worship as gods; and oftentimes the prophets, employing this manner of speech, say that ‘your God is a God of gods, and a Lord of lords,’ adding frequently, ‘the great and strong and terrible [God].’ For such expressions are used, not as if they really were gods, but because the Scripture is teaching us that the true God, who made all things, is Lord alone of those who are reputed gods and lords. And in order that the Holy Spirit may convince [us] of this, He said by the holy David, ‘The gods of the nations, reputed gods, are idols of demons, and not gods;’ and He denounces a curse on those who worship them.

Justin: I would not bring forward these proofs, Trypho, by which I am aware those who worship these [idols] and such like are condemned, but such [proofs] as no one could find any objection to. They will appear strange to you, although you read them every day; so that even from this fact we understand that, because of your wickedness, God has withheld from you the ability to discern the wisdom of His Scriptures; yet [there are] some exceptions, to whom, according to the grace of His long-suffering, as Isaiah said, He has left a seed of salvation, lest your race be utterly destroyed, like Sodom and Gomorrha. Pay attention, therefore, to what I shall record out of the holy Scriptures, which do not need to be expounded, but only listened to.

Chapter 56. God who appeared to Moses is distinguished from God the Father

Justin: Moses, then, the blessed and faithful servant of God, declares that He who appeared to Abraham under the oak in Mamre is God, sent with the two angels in His company to judge Sodom by Another who remains ever in the supercelestial places, invisible to all men, holding personal intercourse with none, whom we believe to be Maker and Father of all things; for he speaks thus: ‘God appeared to him under the oak in Mamre, as he sat at his tent-door at noontide. And lifting up his eyes, he saw, and behold, three men stood before him; and when he saw them, he ran to meet them from the door of his tent; and he bowed himself toward the ground, and said …’ Genesis 18:1-2 ‘Abraham went up early in the morning to the place where he stood before the Lord: and he looked toward Sodom and Gomorrha, and toward the adjacent country, and beheld, and, lo, a flame went up from the earth, like the smoke of a furnace.’

And when I had made an end of quoting these words, I asked them if they had understood them. And they said they had understood them, but that the passages adduced brought forward no proof that there is any other God or Lord, or that the Holy Spirit says so, besides the Maker of all things.

Justin: I shall attempt to persuade you, since you have understood the Scriptures, [of the truth] of what I say, that there is, and that there is said to be, another God and Lord subject to the Maker of all things; who is also called an Angel, because He announces to men whatsoever the Maker of all things— above whom there is no other God — wishes to announce to them.

I quoted once more the previous passage.

Justin: Do you think that God appeared to Abraham under the oak in Mamre, as the Scripture asserts?

Trypho: Assuredly.

Justin: Was He one of those three whom Abraham saw, and whom the Holy Spirit of prophecy describes as men?

Trypho: No; but God appeared to him, before the vision of the three. Then those three whom the Scripture calls men, were angels; two of them sent to destroy Sodom, and one to announce the joyful tidings to Sarah, that she would bear a son; for which cause he was sent, and having accomplished his errand, went away.

Justin: How then does the one of the three, who was in the tent, and who said, ‘I shall return to you hereafter, and Sarah shall have a son,’ Genesis 18:10 appear to have returned when Sarah had begotten a son, and to be there declared, by the prophetic word, God? But that you may clearly discern what I say, listen to the words expressly employed by Moses; they are these: ‘And Sarah saw the son of Hagar the Egyptian bond-woman, whom she bore to Abraham, sporting with Isaac her son, and said to Abraham, Cast out this bond-woman and her son; for the son of this bond-woman shall not share the inheritance of my son Isaac. And the matter seemed very grievous in Abraham’s sight, because of his son. But God said to Abraham, Let it not be grievous in your sight because of the son, and because of the bond-woman. In all that Sarah has said to you, hearken to her voice; for in Isaac shall your seed be called.’ Genesis 21:9-12 Have you perceived, then, that He who said under the oak that He would return, since He knew it would be necessary to advise Abraham to do what Sarah wished him, came back as it is written; and is God, as the words declare, when they so speak: ‘God said to Abraham, Let it not be grievous in your sight because of the son, and because of the bond-woman?’

Trypho: Certainly; but you have not proved from this that there is another God besides Him who appeared to Abraham, and who also appeared to the other patriarchs and prophets. You have proved, however, that we were wrong in believing that the three who were in the tent with Abraham were all angels.

Justin: If I could not have proved to you from the Scriptures that one of those three is God, and is called Angel, because, as I already said, He brings messages to those to whom God the Maker of all things wishes [messages to be brought], then in regard to Him who appeared to Abraham on earth in human form in like manner as the two angels who came with Him, and who was God even BEFORE THE CREATION OF THE WORLD, it were reasonable for you to entertain the same belief as is entertained by the whole of your nation.

Trypho: Assuredly, for up to this moment this has been our belief.

Justin: Reverting to the Scriptures, I shall endeavour to persuade you, that He who is said to have appeared to Abraham, and to Jacob, and to Moses, and who is called God, is distinct from Him who made all things — numerically, I mean, not [distinct] in will. For I affirm that He has never at any time done anything which He who made the world— above whom there is no other God — has not wished Him both to do and to engage Himself with.

Trypho: Prove now that this is the case, that we also may agree with you. For we do not understand you to affirm that He has done or said anything contrary to the will of the Maker of all things.

Justin: The Scripture just quoted by me will make this plain to you. It is thus: ‘The sun was risen on the earth, and Lot entered into Segor (Zoar); and the Lord rained on Sodom sulphur and fire from the Lord out of heaven, and overthrew these cities and all the neighbourhood.’ Genesis 19:23

The fourth of those who had remained with Trypho: It must therefore necessarily be said that one of the two angels who went to Sodom, and is named by Moses in the Scripture Lord, is different from Him who also is God and appeared to Abraham.

Justin: It is not on this ground solely that it must be admitted absolutely that some other one is called Lord by the Holy Spirit besides Him who is considered Maker of all things; not solely [for what is said] by Moses, but also [for what is said] by David. For there is written by him: ‘The Lord says to my Lord, Sit on My right hand, until I make Your enemies Your footstool,’ as I have already quoted. And again, in other words: ‘Your throne, O God, is for ever and ever. A sceptre of equity is the sceptre of Your kingdom: You have loved righteousness and hated iniquity: therefore God, even Your God, has anointed You with the oil of gladness above Your fellows.’ If, therefore, you assert that the Holy Spirit calls some other one God and Lord, besides the Father of all things and His Christ, answer me; for I undertake to prove to you from Scriptures themselves, that He whom the Scripture calls Lord is not one of the two angels that went to Sodom, but He who was with them, and is called God, that appeared to Abraham.

Trypho: Prove this; for, as you see, the day advances, and we are not prepared for such perilous replies; since never yet have we heard any man investigating, or searching into, or proving these matters; nor would we have tolerated your conversation, had you not referred everything to the Scriptures: for you are very zealous in adducing proofs from them; and you are of opinion that there is no God above the Maker of all things.

Justin: You are aware, then, that the Scripture says, ‘And the Lord said to Abraham, Why did Sarah laugh, saying, Shall I truly conceive? For I am old. Is anything impossible with God? At the time appointed shall I return to you according to the time of life, and Sarah shall have a son.’ Genesis 18:13-14 And after a little interval: ‘And the men rose up from thence, and looked towards Sodom and Gomorrha; and Abraham went with them, to bring them on the way. And the Lord said, I will not conceal from Abraham, my servant, what I do.’ Genesis 18:16-17 And again, after a little, it thus says: ‘The Lord said, The cry of Sodom and Gomorrha is great, and their sins are very grievous. I will go down now, and see whether they have done altogether according to their cry which has come unto me; and if not, that I may know. And the men turned away thence, and went to Sodom. But Abraham was standing before the Lord; and Abraham drew near, and said, Will You destroy the righteous with the wicked?’ Genesis 18:20-23

And so on, for I do not think fit to write over again the same words, having written them all before, but shall of necessity give those by which I established the proof to Trypho and his companions. Then I proceeded to what follows, in which these words are recorded:

Justin: ‘And the Lord went His way as soon as He had left communing with Abraham; and [Abraham] went to his place. And there came two angels to Sodom at even. And Lot sat in the gate of Sodom;’ Genesis 18:33Genesis 19:1 and what follows until, ‘But the men put forth their hands, and pulled Lot into the house to them, and shut to the door of the house;’ Genesis 19:10 and what follows till,

And the angels laid hold on his hand, and on the hand of his wife, and on the hands of his daughters, the Lord being merciful to him. And it came to pass, when they had brought them forth abroad, that they said, Save, save your life. Look not behind you, nor stay in all the neighbourhood; escape to the mountain, lest you be taken along with [them]. And Lot said to them, I beseech [You], O Lord, since Your servant has found grace in Your sight, and You have magnified Your righteousness, which You show towards me in saving my life; but I cannot escape to the mountain, lest evil overtake me, and I die. Behold, this city is near to flee unto, and it is small: there I shall be safe, since it is small; and any soul shall live. And He said to him, Behold, I have accepted you also in this matter, so as not to destroy the city for which you have spoken. Make haste to save yourself there; for I shall not do anything till you have come there. Therefore he called the name of the city Segor (Zoar). The sun was risen upon the earth; and Lot entered into Segor (Zoar). And the Lord rained on Sodom and Gomorrha sulphur and fire from the Lord out of heaven; and He overthrew these cities, and all the neighbourhood. Genesis 19:16-25

Justin: (After another pause.) And now have you not perceived, my friends, that one of the three, who is both God and Lord, and ministers to Him who is in the heavens, is Lord of the two angels? For when [the angels] proceeded to Sodom, He remained behind, and communed with Abraham in the words recorded by Moses; and when He departed after the conversation, Abraham went back to his place. And when he came [to Sodom], the two angels no longer conversed with Lot, but Himself, as the Scripture makes evident; and He is the Lord who received commission from the Lord who [remains] in the heavens, i.e., the Maker of all things, to inflict upon Sodom and Gomorrha the [judgments] which the Scripture describes in these terms: ‘The Lord rained down upon Sodom and Gomorrha sulphur and fire from the Lord out of heaven.’

Chapter 57. The Jew objects, why is He said to have eaten, if He be God? Answer of Justin

Trypho: (When I was silent.) That Scripture compels us to admit this, is manifest; but there is a matter about which we are deservedly at a loss— namely, about what was said to the effect that [the Lord] ate what was prepared and placed before him by Abraham; and you would admit this.

Justin: It is written that they ate; and if we believe that it is said the three ate, and not the two alone— who were really angels, and are nourished in the heavens, as is evident to us, even though they are not nourished by food similar to that which mortals use—(for, concerning the sustenance of manna which supported your fathers in the desert, Scripture speaks thus, that they ate angels’ food): [if we believe that three ate], then I would say that the Scripture which affirms they ate bears the same meaning as when we would say about fire that it has devoured all things; yet it is not certainly understood that they ate, masticating with teeth and jaws. So that not even here should we be at a loss about anything, if we are acquainted even slightly with figurative modes of expression, and able to rise above them.

Trypho: It is possible that [the question] about the mode of eating may be thus explained: [the mode, that is to say,] in which it is written, they took and ate what had been prepared by Abraham: so that you may now proceed to explain to us how this God who appeared to Abraham, and is minister to God the Maker of all things, being born of the Virgin, became man, of like passions with all, as you said previously.

Justin: Permit me first, Trypho, to collect some other proofs on this head, so that you, by the large number of them, may be persuaded of [the truth of] it, and thereafter I shall explain what you ask.

Trypho: Do as seems good to you; for I shall be thoroughly pleased.

Chapter 58. The same is proved from the visions which appeared to Jacob

Justin: I purpose to quote to you Scriptures, not that I am anxious to make merely an artful display of words; for I possess no such faculty, but God’s grace alone has been granted to me to the understanding of His Scriptures, of which grace I exhort all to become partakers freely and bounteously, in order that they may not, through want of it, incur condemnation in the judgment which God the Maker of all things shall hold through my Lord Jesus Christ.

Trypho: What you do is worthy of the worship of God; but you appear to me to feign ignorance when you say that you do not possess a store of artful words.

Justin: Be it so, since you think so; yet I am persuaded that I speak the truth. But give me your attention, that I may now rather adduce the remaining proofs.

Trypho: Proceed.

Justin: It is again written by Moses, my brethren, that He who is called God and appeared to the patriarchs is called both Angel and Lord, in order that from this you may understand Him to be minister to the Father of all things, as you have already admitted, and may remain firm, persuaded by additional arguments. The word of God, therefore, [recorded] by Moses, when referring to Jacob the grandson of Abraham, speaks thus:

And it came to pass, when the sheep conceived, that I saw them with my eyes in the dream: And, behold, the he-goats and the rams which leaped upon the sheep and she-goats were spotted with white, and speckled and sprinkled with a dun color. And the Angel of God said to me in the dream, Jacob, Jacob. And I said, What is it, Lord? And He said, Lift up your eyes, and see that the he-goats and rams leaping on the sheep and she-goats are spotted with white, speckled, and sprinkled with a dun color. For I have seen what Laban does unto you. I am the God who appeared to you in Bethel, where you anointed a pillar and vowed a vow unto Me. Now therefore arise, and get you out of this land, and depart to the land of your birth, and I shall be with you. Genesis 31:10-13

And again, in other words, speaking of the same Jacob, it thus says:

And having risen up that night, he took the two wives, and the two women-servants, and his eleven children, and passed over the ford Jabbok; and he took them and went over the brook, and sent over all his belongings. But Jacob was left behind alone, and an Angel wrestled with him until morning. And He saw that He is not prevailing against him, and He touched the broad part of his thigh; and the broad part of Jacob’s thigh grew stiff while he wrestled with Him. And He said, Let Me go, for the day breaks. But he said, I will not let You go, except You bless me. And He said to him, What is your name? And he said, Jacob. And He said, Your name shall be called no more Jacob, but Israel shall be your name; for you have prevailed with God, and with men shall be powerful. And Jacob asked Him, and said, Tell me Your name. But he said, Why do you ask after My name? And He blessed him there. And Jacob called the name of that place Peniel, for I saw God face to face, and my soul rejoicedGenesis 32:22-30

And again, in other terms, referring to the same Jacob, it says the following:

And Jacob came to Luz, in the land of Canaan, which is Bethel, he and all the people that were with him. And there he built an altar, and called the name of that place Bethel; for there God appeared to him when he fled from the face of his brother Esau. And Deborah, Rebekah’s nurse, died, and was buried beneath Bethel under an oak: and Jacob called the name of it The Oak of Sorrow. And God appeared again to Jacob in Luz, when he came out from Mesopotamia in Syria, and He blessed him. And God said to him, Your name shall be no more called Jacob, but Israel shall he your name. Genesis 35:6-10

He is called God, and He is and shall be God.

And when all had agreed on these grounds, I continued:

Moreover, I consider it necessary to repeat to you the words which narrate how He who is both Angel and God and Lord, and who appeared as a man to Abraham, and who wrestled in human form with Jacob, was seen by him when he fled from his brother Esau. They are as follows: ‘And Jacob went out from the well of the oath, and went toward Charran. And he lighted on a spot, and slept there, for the sun was set; and he gathered of the stones of the place, and put them under his head. And he slept in that place; and he dreamed, and, behold, a ladder was set up on the earth, whose top reached to heaven; and the angels of God ascended and descended upon it. And the Lord stood above it, and He said, I am the Lord, the God of Abraham your father, and of Isaac; be not afraid: the land whereon you lie to you will I give it, and to your seed; and your seed shall be as the dust of the earth, and shall be extended to the west, and south, and north, and east: and in you, and in your seed, shall all families of the earth be blessed. And, behold, I am with you, keeping you in every way wherein you go, and will bring you again into this land; for I will not leave you, until I have done all that I have spoken to you of. And Jacob awaked out of his sleep, and said, Surely the Lord is in this place, and I knew it not. And he was afraid, and said, How dreadful is this place! This is none other than the house of God, and this is the gate of heaven. And Jacob rose up in the morning, and took the stone which he had placed under his head, and he set it up for a pillar, and poured oil upon the top of it; and Jacob called the name of the place The House of God, and the name of the city formerly was Ulammaus.’

Chapter 59. God distinct from the Father conversed with Moses

Justin: Permit me, further, to show you from the book of Exodus how this same One, who is both Angel, and God, and Lord, and man, and who appeared in human form to Abraham and Isaac, appeared in a flame of fire from the bush, and conversed with Moses.

And after they said they would listen cheerfully, patiently, and eagerly, I went on:

These words are in the book which bears the title of Exodus: ‘And after many days the king of Egypt died, and the children of Israel groaned by reason of the works;’ Exodus 2:23 and so on until, ‘Go and gather the elders of Israel, and you shall say unto them, The Lord God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, has appeared to me, saying, I am surely beholding you, and the things which have befallen you in Egypt.’ Exodus 3:16

In addition to these words, I went on: Have you perceived, sirs, that this very God whom Moses speaks of as an Angel that talked to him in the flame of fire, declares to Moses that He is the God of Abraham, of Isaac, and of Jacob?

Chapter 60. Opinions of the Jews with regard to Him who appeared in the bush

Trypho: We do not perceive this from the passage quoted by you, but [only this], that it was an angel who appeared in the flame of fire, but God who conversed with Moses; so that there were really two persons in company with each other, an angel and God, that appeared in that vision.

Justin: Even if this were so, my friends, that an angel and God were together in the vision seen by Moses, yet, as has already been proved to you by the passages previously quoted, it will not be the Creator of all things that is the God that said to Moses that He was the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, but it will be He who has been proved to you to have appeared to Abraham, ministering to the will of the Maker of all things, and likewise carrying into execution His counsel in the judgment of Sodom; so that, even though it be as you say, that there were two— an angel and God — he who has but the smallest intelligence will not venture to assert that the Maker and Father of all things, having left all supercelestial matters, was visible on a little portion of the earth.

Trypho: Since it has been previously proved that He who is called God and Lord, and appeared to Abraham, received from the Lord, who is in the heavens, that which He inflicted on the land of Sodom, even although an angel had accompanied the God who appeared to Moses, we shall perceive that the God who communed with Moses from the bush was not the Maker of all things, but He who has been shown to have manifested Himself to Abraham and to Isaac and to Jacob; who also is called and is perceived to be the Angel of God the Maker of all things, because He publishes to men the commands of the Father and Maker of all things.

Justin: Now assuredly, Trypho, I shall show that, in the vision of Moses, this same One alone who is called an Angel, and who is God, appeared to and communed with Moses. For the Scripture says thus: ‘The Angel of the Lord appeared to him in a flame of fire from the bush; and he sees that the bush burns with fire, but the bush was not consumed. And Moses said, I will turn aside and see this great sight, for the bush is not burnt. And when the Lord saw that he is turning aside to behold, the Lord called to him out of the bush.’ Exodus 3:2-4 In the same manner, therefore, in which the Scripture calls Him who appeared to Jacob in the dream an Angel, then [says] that the same Angel who appeared in the dream spoke to himGenesis 35:7 saying, ‘I am the God that appeared to you when you fled from the face of Esau your brother;’ and [again] says that, in the judgment which befell Sodom in the days of Abraham, the Lord had inflicted the punishment of the Lord who [dwells] in the heavens;— even so here, the Scripture, in announcing that the Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses, and in afterwards declaring him to be Lord and God, speaks of the same One, whom it declares by the many testimonies already quoted to be minister to God, who is above the world, above whom there is no other [God].

Chapter 61. Wisdom is begotten of the Father, as fire from fire

Justin: I shall give you another testimony, my friends, from the Scriptures, that God begot BEFORE ALL CREATURES a Beginning, [who was] a certain rational power [proceeding] FROM HIMSELF, who is called by the Holy Spirit, now the Glory of the Lord, now the Son, again Wisdom, again an Angel, then God, and then Lord and Logos; and on another occasion He calls Himself Captain, when He appeared in human form to Joshua the son of Nave (Nun). For He can be called by all those names, since He ministers to the Father’s will, and since He was begotten of the Father by an act of will; just as we see happening among ourselves: for when we give out some word, we beget the word; yet not by abscission, so as to lessen the word [which remains] in us, when we give it out: and just as we see also happening in the case of a fire, which is not lessened when it has kindled [another], but remains the same; and that which has been kindled by it likewise appears to exist by itself, not diminishing that from which it was kindled. The Word of Wisdom, who is Himself this God begotten of the Father of all things, and Word, and Wisdom, and Power, and the Glory of the Begetter, will bear evidence to me, when He speaks by Solomon the following:

If I shall declare to you what happens daily, I shall call to mind events from everlasting, and review them. The Lord made me the beginning of His ways for His works. From everlasting He established me in the beginning, before He had made the earth, and before He had made the deeps, before the springs of the waters had issued forth, before the mountains had been established. Before all the hills He begets me. God made the country, and the desert, and the highest inhabited places under the sky. When He made ready the heavens, I was along with Him, and when He set up His throne on the winds: when He made the high clouds strong, and the springs of the deep safe, when He made the foundations of the earth, I was with Him arranging. I was that in which He rejoiced; daily and at all times I delighted in His countenance, because He delighted in the finishing of the habitable world, and delighted in the sons of men. Now, therefore, O son, hear me. Blessed is the man who shall listen to me, and the mortal who shall keep my ways, watching daily at my doors, observing the posts of my ingoings. For my outgoings are the outgoings of life, and [my] will has been prepared by the Lord. But they who sin against me, trespass against their own souls; and they who hate me love death.

Chapter 62. The words Let Us make man agree with the testimony of Proverbs

Justin: And the same sentiment was expressed, my friends, by the word of God [written] by Moses, when it indicated to us, with regard to Him whom it has pointed out, that God speaks in the creation of man with the very same design, in the following words: ‘Let Us make man after our image and likeness. And let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the heaven, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over all the creeping things that creep on the earth. And God created man: after the image of God did He create him; male and female created He them. And God blessed them, and said, Increase and multiply, and fill the earth, and have power over it.’ And that you may not change the [force of the] words just quoted, and repeat what your teachers assert — either that God said to Himself, ‘Let Us make,’ just as we, when about to do something, oftentimes say to ourselves, ‘Let us make;’ or that God spoke to the elements, to wit, the earth and other similar substances of which we believe man was formed, ‘Let Us make,’— I shall quote again the words narrated by Moses himself, from which we can indisputably learn that [God] conversed with some one who was numerically distinct from Himself, and also a rational Being. These are the words: ‘And God said, Behold, Adam has become as one of us, to know good and evil.’ Genesis 3:22 In saying, therefore, ‘as one of us,’ [Moses] has declared that [there is a certain] number of persons associated with one another, and that they are at least two. For I would not say that the dogma of that heresy which is said to be among you is true, or that the teachers of it can prove that [God] spoke to angels, or that the human frame was the workmanship of angels. But this Offspring, which was truly brought forth from the Father, was with the Father BEFORE ALL THE CREATURES, and the Father communed with Him; even as the Scripture by Solomon has made clear, that He whom Solomon calls Wisdom, was begotten as a Beginning BEFORE ALL HIS CREATURES and as Offspring by God, who has also declared this same thing in the revelation made by Joshua the son of Nave (Nun). Listen, therefore, to the following from the book of Joshua, that what I say may become manifest to you; it is this: ‘And it came to pass, when Joshua was near Jericho, he lifted up his eyes, and sees a man standing over against him. And Joshua approached to Him, and said, Are you for us, or for our adversaries? And He said to him, I am Captain of the Lord’s host: now have I come. And Joshua fell on his face on the ground, and said to Him, Lord, what do You command Your servant? And the Lord’s Captain says to Joshua, Loose the shoes off your feet; for the place whereon you stand is holy ground. And Jericho was shut up and fortified, and no one went out of it. And the Lord said to Joshua, Behold, I give into your hand Jericho, and its king, [and] its mighty men.’

Chapter 63. It is proved that this God was incarnate

Trypho: This point has been proved to me forcibly, and by many arguments, my friend. It remains, then, to prove that He submitted to become man by the Virgin, according to the will of His Father; and to be crucified, and to die. Prove also clearly, that after this He rose again and ascended to heaven.

Justin: This, too, has been already demonstrated by me in the previously quoted words of the prophecies, my friends; which, by recalling and expounding for your sakes, I shall endeavour to lead you to agree with me also about this matter. The passage, then, which Isaiah records, ‘Who shall declare His generation? For His life is taken away from the earth,’ Isaiah 53:8— does it not appear to you to refer to One who, not having descent from men, was said to be delivered over to death by God for the transgressions of the people?— of whose blood, Moses (as I mentioned before), when speaking in parable, said, that He would wash His garments in the blood of the grape; since His blood did not spring from the seed of man, but from the will of God.

And then, what is said by David, ‘In the splendours of Your holiness have I begotten You from the womb, before the morning star. The Lord has sworn, and will not repent, You are a priest for ever, after the order of Melchizedek,’ — does this not declare to you that [He was] from of old, and that the God and Father of all things intended Him to be begotten by a human womb? And speaking in other words, which also have been already quoted, [he says]: ‘Your throne, O God, is for ever and ever: a sceptre of rectitude is the sceptre of Your kingdom. You have loved righteousness, and have hated iniquity: therefore God, even your God, has anointed You with the oil of gladness above Your fellows. [He has anointed You] with myrrh, and oil, and cassia from Your garments, from the ivory palaces, whereby they made You glad. King’s daughters are in Your honour. The queen stood at Your right hand, clad in garments embroidered with gold. Hearken, O daughter, and behold, and incline your ear, and forget your people and the house of your father; and the King shall desire your beauty: because he is your Lord, and you shall worship Him.’ Therefore these words testify explicitly that He is witnessed to by Him who established these things, as deserving to be worshipped, as God and as Christ. Moreover, that the word of God speaks to those who believe in Him as being one soul, and one synagogue, and one church, as to a daughter; that it thus addresses the church which has sprung from His name and partakes of His name (for we are all called Christians), is distinctly proclaimed in like manner in the following words, which teach us also to forget [our] old ancestral customs, when they speak thus: ‘Hearken, O daughter, and behold, and incline your ear; forget your people and the house of your father, and the King shall desire your beauty: because He is your Lord, and you shall worship Him.’

There’s more!

Chapter 126. The various names of Christ according to both natures. It is shown that He is God, and appeared to the patriarchs

Justin: But if you knew, Trypho, who He is that is called at one time the Angel of great counsel, and a Man by Ezekiel, and like the Son of man by Daniel, and a Child by Isaiah, and Christ and God to be worshipped by David, and Christ and a Stone by many, and Wisdom by Solomon, and Joseph and Judah and a Star by Moses, and the East by Zechariah, and the Suffering One and Jacob and Israel by Isaiah again, and a Rod, and Flower, and Corner-Stone, and Son of God, you would not have blasphemed Him who has now come, and been born, and suffered, and ascended to heaven; who shall also come again, and then your twelve tribes shall mourn. For if you had understood what has been written by the prophets, you would not have denied that He was God, Son of the only, unbegotten, unutterable God. For Moses says somewhere in Exodus the following: ‘The Lord spoke to Moses, and said to him, I am the Lord, and I appeared to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob, being their God; and my name I revealed not to them, and I established my covenant with them.’ And thus again he says, ‘A man wrestled with Jacob,’ and asserts it was God; narrating that Jacob said, ‘I have seen God face to face, and my life is preserved.’ And it is recorded that he called the place where He wrestled with him, appeared to and blessed him, the Face of God (Peniel). And Moses says that God appeared also to Abraham near the oak in Mamre, when he was sitting at the door of his tent at mid-day. Then he goes on to say: ‘And he lifted up his eyes and looked, and, behold, three men stood before him; and when he saw them, he ran to meet them.’ Genesis 18:2 After a little, one of them promises a son to Abraham: ‘Wherefore did Sarah laugh, saying, Shall I of a surety bear a child, and I am old? Is anything impossible with God? At the time appointed I will return, according to the time of life, and Sarah shall have a son. And they went away from Abraham.’ Again he speaks of them thus: ‘And the men rose up from thence, and looked toward Sodom.’ Genesis 18:16 Then to Abraham He who was and is again speaks: ‘I will not hide from Abraham, my servant, what I intend to do.’ Genesis 18:17

And what follows in the writings of Moses I quoted and explained:

From which I have demonstrated that He who is described as God appeared to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob, and the other patriarchs, was appointed under the authority of the Father and Lord, and ministers to His will.

Then I went on to say what I had not said before:

And so, when the people desired to eat flesh, and Moses had lost faith in Him, who also there is called the Angel, and who promised that God would give them to satiety, He who is both God and the Angel, sent by the Father, is described as saying and doing these things. For thus the Scripture says: ‘And the Lord said to Moses, Will the Lord’s hand not be sufficient? You shall know now whether my word shall conceal you or not.’ Numbers 11:23 And again, in other words, it thus says: ‘But the Lord spoke unto me, You shall not go over this Jordan: the Lord your God, who goes before your face, He shall cut off the nations.’

Chapter 127. These passages of Scripture do not apply to the Father, but to the Word

Justin: These and other such sayings are recorded by the lawgiver and by the prophets; and I suppose that I have stated sufficiently, that wherever God says, ‘God went up from Abraham,’ Genesis 18:22 or, ‘The Lord spoke to Moses,’ Exodus 6:29 and ‘The Lord came down to behold the tower which the sons of men had built,’ Genesis 11:5 or when ‘God shut Noah into the ark,’ Genesis 7:16 you must not imagine that the unbegotten God Himself came down or went up from any place. For the ineffable Father and Lord of all neither has come to any place, nor walks, nor sleeps, nor rises up, but remains in His own place, wherever that is, quick to behold and quick to hear, having neither eyes nor ears, but being of indescribable might; and He sees all things, and knows all things, and none of us escapes His observation; and He is not moved or confined to a spot in the whole world, for He existed before the world was made. How, then, could He talk with any one, or be seen by any one, or appear on the smallest portion of the earth, when the people at Sinai were not able to look even on the glory OF HIM WHO WAS SENT FROM HIM; and Moses himself could not enter into the tabernacle which he had erected, when it was filled with the glory of God; and the priest could not endure to stand before the temple when Solomon conveyed the ark into the house in Jerusalem which he had built for it? Therefore neither Abraham, nor Isaac, nor Jacob, nor any other man, saw the Father and ineffable Lord of all, and also of Christ, but [saw] Him who was according to His will His Son, being God, and the Angel because He ministered to His will; whom also it pleased Him to be born man by the Virgin; who also was fire when He conversed with Moses from the bush. Since, unless we thus comprehend the Scriptures, it must follow that the Father and Lord of all had not been in heaven when what Moses wrote took place: ‘And the Lord rained upon Sodom fire and brimstone from the Lord out of heaven.’ Genesis 19:24 and again, when it is thus said by David: ‘Lift up your gates, you rulers; and be lifted up, you everlasting gates; and the King of glory shall enter;’ and again, when He says: ‘The Lord says to my Lord, Sit at My right hand, till I make Your enemies Your footstool.’

Chapter 128. The Word is sent not as an inanimate power, but as a person begotten of the Father’s substance

Justin: And that Christ being Lord, and God the Son of God, and appearing formerly in power as Man, and Angel, and in the glory of fire as at the bush, so also was manifested at the judgment executed on Sodom, has been demonstrated fully by what has been said.

Then I repeated once more all that I had previously quoted from Exodus, about the vision in the bush, and the naming of Joshua (Jesus), and continued:

And do not suppose, sirs, that I am speaking superfluously when I repeat these words frequently: but it is because I know that some wish to anticipate these remarks, and to say that the power sent from the Father of all which appeared to Moses, or to Abraham, or to Jacob, is called an Angel because He came to men (for by Him the commands of the Father have been proclaimed to men); is called Glory, because He appears in a vision sometimes that cannot be borne; is called a Man, and a human being, because He appears arrayed in such forms as the Father pleases; and they call Him the Word, because He carries tidings from the Father to men: but maintain that this power is indivisible and inseparable from the Father, just as they say that the light of the sun on earth is indivisible and inseparable from the sun in the heavens; as when it sinks, the light sinks along with it; so the Father, when He chooses, say they, causes His power to spring forth, and when He chooses, He makes it return to Himself. In this way, they teach, He made the angels. But it is proved that there are angels who always exist, and are never reduced to that form out of which they sprang. And that this power which the prophetic word calls God, as has been also amply demonstrated, and Angel, is not numbered [as different] in name only like the light of the sun but is indeed something numerically distinct, I have discussed briefly in what has gone before; when I asserted that this power was begotten from the Father, by His power and will, but not by abscission, as if the essence of the Father were divided; as all other things partitioned and divided are not the same after as before they were divided: and, for the sake of example, I took the case of fires kindled from a fire, which we see to be distinct from it, and yet that from which many can be kindled is by no means made less, but remains the same.

Chapter 129. That is confirmed from other passages of Scripture

Justin: And now I shall again recite the words which I have spoken in proof of this point. When Scripture says, ‘The Lord rained fire from the Lord out of heaven,’ the prophetic word indicates that THERE WERE TWO IN NUMBER: One upon the earth, who, it says, descended to behold the cry of Sodom; Another in heaven, who also is Lord of the Lord on earth, as He is Father and God; the cause of His power and of His being Lord and God. Again, when the Scripture records that God said in the beginning, ‘Behold, Adam has become like one of Us,’ Genesis 3:22 this phrase, ‘like one of Us,’ is also indicative of number; and the words do not admit of a figurative meaning, as the sophists endeavour to affix on them, who are able neither to tell nor to understand the truth. And it is written in the book of Wisdom: ‘If I should tell you daily events, I would be mindful to enumerate them from the beginning. The Lord created me the beginning of His ways for His works. From everlasting He established me in the beginning, before He formed the earth, and before He made the depths, and before the springs of waters came forth, before the mountains were settled; He begets me before all the hills.’

When I repeated these words, I added:

You perceive, my hearers, if you bestow attention, that the Scripture has declared that this Offspring was begotten by the Father BEFORE ALL THINGS CREATED; and that which is begotten is NUMERICALLY DISTINCT FROM THAT WHICH BEGETS, any one will admit. (Chapters 125-142)

SUMMATION

Here is the list of scriptural citations Justin cites to prove that there are two distinct Persons described as YHWH God, and that the YHWH God who appeared throughout the Hebrew Bible is not the Father, but Jesus Christ the Son in his prehuman existence: Genesis 1:26; 3:22; 18:1-33; 19:1-29; 21:9-12; 28:10-22; 31:10-13; 32:22-30; 35:6-10; Exodus 3:1-16; Joshua 5:13-15; Psalm 45:1-11; 110:1-3; Proverbs 8:22-36.

Justin clearly affirms that Christ is not a creature that came into being with the creation. Rather, Justin emphatically states that Christ was begotten out of the Father himself from before all creatures since it was the prehuman Jesus who was the One appointed to begin the creation. Justin, therefore, did not believe that Christ was a created being but, instead, proclaims him to be the uncreated, eternal Logos (Word) of the Father.

This is further confirmed by Justin identifying Christ as that very YHWH who appeared to the patriarchs and prophets. Justin even quotes the Psalmists to prove that Jesus is that very YHWH of Hosts proclaimed in these very Psalms!

Chapter 36. HE PROVES THAT CHRIST IS CALLED LORD OF HOSTS

Trypho: Let these things be so as you say—namely, that it was foretold Christ would suffer, and be called a stone; and after His first appearance, in which it had been announced He would suffer, would come in glory, and be Judge finally of all, and eternal King and Priest. Now show if this man be He of whom these prophecies were made.

Justin: As you wish, Trypho, I shall come to these proofs which you seek in the fitting place; but now you will permit me first to recount the prophecies, which I wish to do in order to prove THAT CHRIST IS CALLED BOTH GOD AND LORD OF HOSTS, and Jacob, in parable by the Holy Spirit; and your interpreters, as God says, are foolish, since they say that reference is made to Solomon and not to Christ, when he bore the ark of testimony into the temple which he built. The Psalm of David is this:

The earth is the Lord’s, and the fullness thereof; the world, and all that dwell therein. He has rounded it upon the seas, and prepared it upon the floods. Who shall ascend into the hill of the Lord? Or who shall stand in His holy place? He that is clean of hands and pure of heart: who has not received his soul in vain, and has not sworn guilefully to his neighbour: he shall receive blessing from the Lord, and mercy from God his Saviour. This is the generation of them that seek the Lord, that seek the face of the God of Jacob. Lift up your gates, you rulers; and be lifted up, you everlasting doors; and the King of glory shall come in. Who is this King of glory? The Lord strong and mighty in battle. Lift up your gates, you rulers; and be lifted up, you everlasting doors; and the King of glory shall come in. Who is this King of glory? The Lord of hosts, He is the King of glory.

Accordingly, it is shown that Solomon is not the Lord of hosts; but when our Christ rose from the dead and ascended to heaven, the rulers in heaven, under appointment of God, are commanded to open the gates of heaven, THAT HE WHO IS KING OF GLORY may enter in, and having ascended, may sit on the right hand of the Father until He make the enemies His footstool, as has been made manifest by another Psalm. For when the rulers of heaven saw Him of uncomely and dishonoured appearance, and inglorious, not recognising Him, they inquired, ‘Who is this King of glory?’ And the Holy Spirit, either from the person of His Father, or from His own person, answers them, ‘The Lord of hosts, He is this King of glory.’ For every one will confess that not one of those who presided over the gates of the temple at Jerusalem would venture to say concerning Solomon, though he was so glorious a king, or concerning the ark of testimony, ‘Who is this King of glory?’

Chapter 37. The same is proved from other Psalms

Justin: Moreover, in the diapsalm of the forty-sixth Psalm, REFERENCE IS THUS MADE TO CHRIST: ‘GOD WENT UP WITH A SHOUT, THE LORD WITH THE SOUND OF A TRUMPET. Sing to OUR GOD, sing: sing to our King, sing; for God is King of all the earth: sing with understanding. God has ruled over the nations. God sits upon His holy throne. The rulers of the nations were assembled along with THE GOD OF ABRAHAM, for the strong ones of God are greatly exalted on the earth.’ And in the ninety-eighth Psalm, the Holy Spirit reproaches you, AND PREDICTS HIM WHOM YOU DO NOT WISH TO BE KING TO BE KING AND LORD, both of Samuel, and of Aaron, and of Moses, and, in short, of all the others. And the words of the Psalm are these:

The Lord has reigned, let the nations be angry: [it is] He who sits upon the cherubim, let the earth be shaken. The Lord is great in Zion, and He is high above all the nations. Let them confess Your great name, for it is fearful and holy, and the honour of the King loves judgment. You have prepared equity; judgment and righteousness have You performed in Jacob. Exalt the Lord our God, and worship the footstool of His feet; for He is holy. Moses and Aaron among His priests, and Samuel among those who call upon His name. They called (says the Scripture) on the Lord, and He heard them. In the pillar of the cloud He spoke to them; for they kept His testimonies, and the commandment which he gave them. O Lord our God, You heard them: O God, You were propitious to them, and [yet] taking vengeance on all their inventions. Exalt the Lord our God, and worship at His holy hill; for the Lord our God is holy. (Chapters 31-47)

And:

Chapter 85. He proves that Christ is the Lord of Hosts from Psalm 24, and from his authority over demons

Justin: Moreover, some of you venture to expound the prophecy which runs, ‘Lift up your gates, you rulers; and be lifted up, you everlasting doors, that the King of glory may enter,’ as if it referred likewise to Hezekiah, and others of you [expound it] of Solomon; but neither to the latter nor to the former, nor, in short, to any of your kings, can it be proved to have reference, but to this our Christ alone, who appeared without comeliness, and inglorious, as Isaiah and David and all the Scriptures said; WHO IS THE LORD OF HOSTS, by the will of the Father who conferred on Him [the dignity]; who also rose from the dead, and ascended to heaven, as the Psalm and the other Scriptures manifested when they announced Him TO BE LORD OF HOSTS; and of this you may, if you will, easily be persuaded by the occurrences which take place before your eyes. For every demon, when exorcised in the name of this very Son of God— who is the First-born of every creature, who became man by the Virgin, who suffered, and was crucified under Pontius Pilate by your nation, who died, who rose from the dead, and ascended into heaven — is overcome and subdued. But though you exorcise any demon in the name of any of those who were among you— either kings, or righteous men, or prophets, or patriarchs — it will not be subject to you. But if any of you exorcise it in [the name of] the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, it will perhaps be subject to you.

Now assuredly your exorcists, I have said, make use of craft when they exorcise, even as the Gentiles do, and employ fumigations and incantations. But that they are angels and powers whom the word of prophecy by David [commands] to lift up the gates, that He who rose from the dead, Jesus Christ, THE LORD OF HOSTS, according to the will of the Father, might enter, the word of David has likewise showed; which I shall again recall to your attention for the sake of those who were not with us yesterday, for whose benefit, moreover, I sum up many things I said yesterday. And now, if I say this to you, although I have repeated it many times, I know that it is not absurd so to do. For it is a ridiculous thing to see the sun, and the moon, and the other stars, continually keeping the same course, and bringing round the different seasons; and to see the computer who may be asked how many are twice two, because he has frequently said that they are four, not ceasing to say again that they are four; and equally so other things, which are confidently admitted, to be continually mentioned and admitted in like manner; yet that he who founds his discourse on the prophetic Scriptures should leave them and abstain from constantly referring to the same Scriptures, because it is thought he can bring forth something better than Scripture. The passage, then, by which I proved that God reveals that there are both angels and hosts in heaven is this: ‘Praise the Lord from the heavens: praise Him in the highest. Praise Him, all His angels: praise Him, all His hosts.’ (Chapters 69-88)

Here are the Psalms that Justin ascribes to Jesus:

The King of Glory Of David. A Psalm. The earth is Yahweh’s, as well as its fullness, The world, and those who dwell in it. For He has founded it upon the seas And established it upon the rivers. Who may ascend into the mountain of Yahweh? And who may rise in His holy place? He who has innocent hands and a pure heart, Who has not lifted up his soul to worthlessness And has not sworn deceitfully. He shall lift up a blessing from Yahweh And righteousness from the God of his salvation. This is the generation of those who seek Him, Who seek Your face—pay heed O Jacob. Selah. Lift up your heads, O gates, And be lifted up, O ancient doors, That the King of glory may come in! Who is this King of glory? Yahweh strong and mighty, Yahweh mighty in battle. Lift up your heads, O gates, And lift yourselves up, O ancient doors, That the King of glory may come in! Who is He, this King of glory? Yahweh of hosts, He is the King of glory. Selah.” Psalm 24:1-10 Legacy Standard Bible (LSB)

God Is King of All the Earth For the choir director. Of the sons of Korah. A Psalm. O clap your hands, all peoples; Make a loud shout to God with the sound of a shout of joy. For Yahweh Most High is fearsome, A great King over all the earth. He subdues peoples under us And nations under our feet. He chooses our inheritance for us, The pride of Jacob whom He loves. Selah. God has ascended with a loud shout, Yahweh, with the sound of a trumpet. Sing praises to God, sing praises; Sing praises to our King, sing praises. For God is the King of all the earth; Sing praises with a skillful psalm. God reigns over the nations, God sits on His holy throne. The nobles of the peoples have assembled themselves with the people of the God of Abraham, For the shields of the earth belong to God; He is highly exalted.” Psalm 47:1-9 LSB

Holy Is Yahweh Our God Yahweh reigns, let the peoples tremble; He sits enthroned above the cherubim, let the earth quake! Yahweh is great in Zion, And He is exalted above all the peoples. Let them praise Your great and awesome name; Holy is He. The strength of the King loves justice; You have established equity; You have done justice and righteousness in Jacob. Exalt Yahweh our God And worship at the footstool of His feet; Holy is He. Moses and Aaron were among His priests, And Samuel was among those who called on His name; They would call upon Yahweh and He would answer them. He would speak to them in the pillar of cloud; They kept His testimonies And the statute that He gave them. O Yahweh our God, You answered them; You were a forgiving God to them, And yet an avenger of their evil deeds. Exalt Yahweh our God And worship at His holy mountain, For holy is Yahweh our God.” Psalm 99:1-9 LSB

In attributing these passages to Jesus, Justin has identified Christ as YHWH of Hosts, the King of Glory, who is that very God of Israel that Moses and Aaron served as his priests, and whose name the prophets such as Samuel called upon.

Now since YHWH is uncreated, having no beginning to his existence,

From Everlasting to Everlasting, You Are God A Prayer of Moses, the man of God. Lord, You have been our dwelling place from generation to generation. Before the mountains were born Or You brought forth the earth and the world, Even from everlasting to everlasting, You are God.” Psalm 90:1-2 LSB

“Yahweh reigns, He is clothed with majesty; Yahweh has clothed and girded Himself with strength; Indeed, the world is established, it will not be shaken. Your throne is established from of old; You are from everlasting.” Psalm 93:1-2 LSB

Do Not Hide Your Face from Me A Prayer of the afflicted when he is faint and pours out his complaint before Yahweh. O Yahweh, hear my prayer! And let my cry for help come to You… But You, O Yahweh, abide forever, And the remembrance of Your name from generation to generation… Of old You founded the earth, And the heavens are the work of Your hands. Even they will perish, but You will remain; And all of them will wear out like a garment; Like clothing You will change them and they will be changed. But You are the same, And Your years will not come to an end.” Psalm 102:1, 12, 25-27 LSB

This simply reinforces the fact that Justin held the position that Christ is uncreated by nature. Otherwise, we would have to assume that Justin thought that YHWH had a beginning to his existence since for him, Jesus happens to be that very YHWH God Almighty who is proclaimed and glorified all throughout the Hebrew Bible.

FURTHER READING

Justin Martyr’s Witness to Christ’s essential and eternal Deity

AN ORTHODOX’S MISREADING OF JUSTIN

Revisiting Shabir Ally’s Distortion of Justin Martyr Pt. 1, Pt. 2

JUSTIN MARTYR ON THE NAMELESS GOD

THE DIVINE SHEPHERD THAT BRINGS EXILE

The following is taken from The Moody Handbook of Messianic Prophecies: Studies and Expositions of the Messiah in the Old Testament, eds. Michael Rydelnik & Edwin Blum, published by Moody Publishers, Chicago, IL 2019, pp. 1271-1283. 

Zechariah 11:4-14

The Rejected Shepherd

ABNER CHOU

For Old Testament scholars, Zch 11:4-14 poses one of the greatest interpretive challenges of the Hebrew Bible. At least 40 different interpretations exist, and scholars cannot even agree on the basic ideas of the passage.1 For instance, some argue the point of the passage is that the shepherd is good, whereas others contend the point is that he is evil.2 The fact that scholars interpret the passage in polar opposite ways illustrates why they describe Zch 11:4-14 as “the most enigmatic prophecy” and a passage with impenetrable logic.3 These difficulties in turn complicate the NT’s use of this passage. If this text is not about the Messiah, then how do the Gospels apply it to Jesus?4

So what is happening in this text? This article intends to further examine Zch 11:4-14 and argue that although the passage is complex, in the end, the traditional, messianic interpretation best handles all the factors. In studying these issues, we can also discover the theological depth of this text. Hence, the goal of this article is to defend the messianic interpretation of this text and grasp its impact on messianic theology. Indeed, this passage describes the full theological dynamics of a pivotal moment in redemptive history realized in Jesus.

RESOLVING INTERPRETATIVE ISSUES

Various factors, such as exegetical issues, textual emendation, and higher criticism, make this passage difficult for commentators and produce a multiplicity of views. Nevertheless, at risk of oversimplification, the approximately 40 different views can be placed into three major categories:5

First, this passage has long been viewed as a messianic prophecy. Supporters cite the many allusions of this passage to earlier messianic texts (e.g., Branch in Jer 23:5, Zch 3:8 and Shepherd in Ezk 34:15, Zch 11:4). They also note this view’s consistency with the NT and that it poses the least exegetical problems.6 However, problems do still exist. Scholars wonder who the three shepherds are (Zch 11:8), how Jesus deserted the flock of His people (Zch 11:9), and how He annulled the unity between Judah and Israel (Zch 11:14).7

Hence, the second view arises, maintaining that Zch 11:414 depicts the present situation of the prophet himself. This predominantly comes from higher critical methodology that rejects the possibility of prophecy and assumes Zechariah must be describing the political situation of his own time. Based upon this, critical scholars disagree about whether the main shepherd is good or bad.8 They also variously identify the main shepherd as well as the three additional shepherds. These identifications range from foreign nations/leaders to particular governors in Judah to the offices of prophet, priest, and king.9 In sum, the “present” view of the text stems from higher criticism’s desire to reconcile Zechariah’s words with his time, its politics, and with the varying (and even contradictory) thrusts within the book. This is done with varying degrees of success (as reflected in the number of proposals).

The third type of reading tries a different tack. Instead of seeing this text as future or present, it views the passage as a discussion of the past. After all, certain prophetic acts describe Israel’s history (cf. Ezk 4:5). This may follow in suit. The frequent allusions to Jeremiah seem to anchor Zechariah to Jeremiah’s description of the past exile.10 Based upon this, the view contends the main shepherd in the passage is actually Yahweh who will judge the nation into exile.11 The three shepherds He judges in one month are either three specific rulers deposed or the destruction of the three offices of king, prophet, and priest.12 Either way, it refers to the events taking place in 586 BC. The strength, then, of this view is that it is rooted in previous revelation and can account for numerous details of the text.

How does one deal with these issues? We can proceed by thinking through each view.

A major disqualifier for the “present” view is its reliance upon higher criticism. The main reason scholars continue to try to collate the text with Zechariah’s situation to no avail is because higher criticism presumes this must be the case. Conversely, without such an assumption, the impetus of the entire view disappears. Likewise, higher critics acknowledge that if one read the text cohesively in context and not via source critical method, then the “present” view has no grounds.13 Since higher criticism is incompatible with a high view of Scripture and a cohesive reading of the passage within the context of the book, the “present” interpretation can be ruled out.

Likewise, the “past” view has serious problems. It has difficulty identifying the “potter” in Zch 11:13 to the point where it advocates changing the text to “storehouse.”14 However, such textual emendation is without any evidence. The need to change the text to make a view work is a substantial problem. Other problems arise as well. The view also has difficulty exactly identifying the “three shepherds.” More fundamentally, this view has contextual and exegetical objections. To be sure, as proponents of this view allege, dramatic acts in prophecy can refer to the past (cf. Ezk 4:5). But in those cases, the text provides some indication of this.15 Zechariah has none of these indications; in fact, it has the opposite. The other dramatic acts in the book are unmistakably future in nature (cf. 3:1-8; 6:9-15), which would suggest that this passage does not refer to the “past” but to the future. The imperfect tense of the verbs in the text also implies this. Thus, the “past” view has contextual and exegetical problems to the point that it might need to change the text to work. These are substantial issues that indicate the view is not tenable.

So far, we have observed problems in the non-messianic views. While these arguments can help exclude those interpretations, a case still must be made for the traditional messianic view. Three major lines of reasoning support the traditional interpretation.

First, the context overwhelming directs the reader to a messianic interpretation. This begins with the intertextuality of the book with other messianic passages. Zechariah is replete with messianic titles and descriptions like the “Branch” (Zch 3:8), “riding on a donkey” (Zch 9:9), king/priest (Zch 6:11), and “pierced” (Zch 12:10). Scholars recognize that such language alludes to messianic texts in Isa (11:1), Jer (23:5), Gn (49:10), Ezk (34:15), and Dan (9:26).16 Scholars also note the interplay of messianic discussion in the minor prophets, which culminates in Zechariah.17 Indeed, key texts in Zechariah expound the Minor Prophets’ picture of how the rise of Messiah would establish the nations’ judgment and Israel’s restoration (6:9-15; 9:9; 14:1-21; cf. Hos 3:5; Am 9:11; Mic 5:1; Hab 3:13; Hag 2:21-23). Zechariah’s rich intertextuality with prior revelation anchors it as a book that discusses Messiah. In fact, Kline observes that the book is structured to emphasize the Messiah.18 This broad context already guides the reader to think of Zechariah as a book about messianic theology.

The argument within the book shows that Zch 11:4-11 is critically part of that discussion. For one, Zechariah speaks of Messiah in the immediate context. In Zch 9:9, the prophet describes the Messiah riding humbled on a donkey.19 This text not only introduces the notion of Messiah but also that He suffers as He is “humbled” or “afflicted.” These ideas certainly fit with what is described in Zch 11:4-11. The immediate context sets up for a messianic viewpoint of what happens in that text. Furthermore, the passage connects with earlier messianic discussions in the book. Scholars observe that this text is part of a series of passages where God calls on the prophet to dramatically act out His message (Zch 3:1-8; 6:9-15).20 Since those earlier passages are about Messiah, one would expect that Zch 11:4-11 follows suit. The content of this passage confirms it. Kline notes how the texts uniquely share the language and ideas of royalty/shepherd (6:9-15; 11:4), “silver” (6:11; 11:13), and “temple” (6:14; 11:13). Accordingly, Zch 11:4-11 is interwoven into the development of Messiah in the book. Consistently, later passages maintain a messianic interpretation of this text. Zechariah 12:10 discusses the One who was pierced, and Zch 13:7 refers to the Shepherd that was struck down. Those texts, in discussing the Messiah,21 refer to Him in the way Zch 11 describes. Their descriptions assume a messianic interpretation and confirm it thereby.

With that, all the layers of context, from the book as a whole to the immediate context of the passage itself, situate the text in a messianic train of thought. That tremendously supports the traditional view.

Second, the content of the passage also favors a messianic reading. As noted, the language of Zch 11:4-11 is connected with messianic texts earlier in the book (cf. Zch 3:1-8; 6:9-15). On top of this, the passage employs the motif of a shepherd with the staffs of Union and Favor. Such language explicitly refers to Ezk 34:1-15 and 37:16, both of which speak of Messiah.22 Hence, Zch 11:4-11 not only embeds itself in prior messianic discussion in the book but also is based upon a messianic text outside of the book. This is messianic claim upon messianic claim.

Third, one can deal with the challenges to the traditional reading. As discussed, there are three major objections to the messianic reading: Who are the three shepherds (Zch 11:8), how did Jesus desert His people (Zch 11:9), and how did He annul the unity between Judah and Israel (Zch 11:14)?23 These problems must be resolved.

Concerning the first issue of the shepherds, the context of Zechariah begins to answer this. The book emphasizes the offices of prophet (Zch 7:3), priest (Zch 6:11), and king (Zch 6:11). In fact, the only other usages of “shepherd” occur in the immediate context and refer to the prophet (Zch 10:2-3) and the royal house (Zch 11:3, “young lions” and “shepherds” refer to the royal house). Thus, the three shepherds best refer to the governing offices of Israel.24 The use of shepherd elsewhere in Scripture supports this (cf. 2Sm 5:2). The grammar of the text also confirms this. Zechariah uses the article with the phrase “three shepherds,” a sign that Zechariah speaks not of individual shepherds (cf. Zch 11:5) but governmental offices (cf. Zch 10:2). Hence, language and context show Zechariah speaks of prophet, priest, and king. This idea is easily harmonized with the work of Messiah. Jesus certainly confronted Israel’s leadership (Lk 13:32; 22:66-71), and they even acknowledged the loss of power they would face as a result (Jn 11:48). The objection is resolved.

What about the other issues of Jesus deserting His people and annulling unity? These matters can be resolved through the detail of “the potter” (Zch 11:13). As noted, other views struggled to make sense of this phrase. A key observation is that the Hebrew word, in its particular form (hayotzer), occurs only in Jer 18–19, out of the entire Hebrew Bible. Others have already recognized the numerous allusions to Jeremiah in this passage.25 “The potter” is another one of those. In that book, “the potter” signifies God’s right to judge Israel in exile.26 His appearance again in Zechariah signifies a repetition of the same event: Israel’s rejection of Messiah will cause the nation to enter deeper into the exile. This interpretation accounts for the reason scholars often do not harmonize these details with Israel’s history (because they are not the same event), but yet why it connects with Jeremiah. This interpretation also is easy to harmonize with Jesus’ life. Israel’s rejection of their Messiah plunged them deeper into exile; hence, Messiah left their house desolate (Mt 23:38) and destroyed any immediate opportunity for Israel’s reunification in the kingdom (cf. Ezk 37:17).27 Again, the objections are resolved.

With the objections resolved, the evidence thoroughly supports the messianic reading. In fact, given the immensely messianic progression of context and content, the reader would have no other expectation. That is confirmed by later revelation that, as will be seen, reads the text exactly this way. The Scripture is completely consistent in how it builds up for this passage and how it subsequently interprets it. The messianic interpretation is the reading of Scripture in every regard.

This discussion has sought to defend the messianic interpretation of Zch 11, which helps readers better see the significance of this passage. Israel’s rejection of their King will only lead them deeper into exile. This is a defining moment of redemptive history and thereby of great importance for understanding the Messiah in God’s plan.

A brief exposition of this text can help bring out this theological significance, providing further proof that it is messianic. This discussion will review the context and exposition of the text to show the prophet’s intent in discussing the Messiah’s rejection.

LITERARY CONTEXT

The name “Zechariah” means “YHWH remembers.” This is fitting for a book that refers to so much prior revelation. Zechariah wrote to Israelites who had returned from Babylon (Zch 1:1-3) and were rebuilding the temple. His task was to demonstrate that God remembers His promises, and to assure the nation and exhort them to faithfulness.28

Within this, Zechariah reveals a series of night visions. These proclaim that God remembers His promises about His readiness to act (1:7-17; 6:1-8), and about the nations (1:18-21; 5:5-11), and Israel (2:1-13; 5:1-4). Technically, these visions are arranged chiastically, centering on God’s promises of His Messiah, who is King and Priest (3:1–4:14).29 In light of this, the prophet’s theology is clear: God is faithful, and His Anointed One is central to His guarantees.

For this reason, after the night visions, Zechariah uses various people to depict the future moment when the Messiah resolves Israel’s exile (Zch 6:9-15). Because God still will accomplish this reality, Zechariah exhorts the people to truly worship God and repent (Zch 7–8). Again, Zechariah establishes that the Messiah is critical.

In the latter half of the book the prophet presents God’s plan, from the present to its culmination. Zechariah reveals redemptive history that will revolve around God’s purposes for the nations (9–11) and His purposes for Israel (12–14). Within this, Zechariah continues his emphasis on the Messiah. The issues with the nations will resolve via a conquering Messiah riding on a donkey (Zch 9:9). Israel’s restoration will come about when they mourn over the One they pierced (Zch 12:10) and via the Shepherd who was stricken (Zch 13:7). In the end, the Messiah will reign over Israel and the world in victory forever (Zch 14:1-21).

At this point, some questions should arise. While it makes sense in context for the Messiah to be a conquering hero (cf. Zch 9:9), it may surprise some to hear that He is also pierced and a stricken Shepherd. One cannot disregard these details, for the prophet links them with Israel’s repentance (Zch 12:10-12) and the forgiveness of their sins (cf. Zch 13:1). So how did the Messiah become stricken, and how does this set up for Israel’s restoration? Although such suffering was hinted at earlier in the book (cf. Zch 9:9 and the term “humbled”), more information is needed to answer these questions.

That is precisely where Zch 11:4-11 comes into play. In fact, M. G. Kline rightly notes that Zch 9–11 is a chiasm and that this passage is its center. It is the pivot that explains how the King victorious riding on His donkey (cf. Zch 9:9) becomes afflicted and how that ultimately leads to the redemption of His people (Zch 12–13). This is what the content of the passage will expound upon.

INTERTEXTUAL CONTEXT

Although Zechariah is replete with allusions, this discussion will focus on the allusions that bring out the “hinge” nature of the text.

The immediate context alludes to some key texts along this line. In Zch 9:9, God unveils the Messiah humbly riding on a donkey. Krause observes that the word “humble” alludes to Isa 53 and Dan 9.30 These texts help interpret the Shepherd’s suffering in Zch 11. They show that the Messiah’s betrayal deals with His sacrificial death (Isa 53:35) that accomplishes atonement (Dan 9:24, 26).

Within the passage itself, two other allusions help to express the pivotal nature of the passage. Zechariah alludes to Ezk 34 with the shepherd motif (Zch 11:4) and staffs (Zch 11:7; cf. Ezk 37:16). He also alludes to Jeremiah with the reference to the “potter,” among others (Zch 11:13; cf. Jer 18:6). On the one hand, the allusions to Ezk 34 demonstrate that the shepherd of the text is the Messiah who will fulfill the promise to restore His people (see Zch 11:7). On the other hand, the Shepherd breaks the staffs of unity and harmony unlike in the prophecies of Ezk 34. Israel’s restoration is not yet. For this reason, Zechariah also alludes to Jeremiah to show that Israel goes deeper into exile as discussed in that book (cf. Zch 11:13; Jer 18–19). Thus, Zechariah’s allusions establish a tension of judgment along with future hope. The rest of the book bears out this tension. The verses immediately after this passage speak of the climax of Israel’s judgment in the tribulation (Zch 11:15-17). Yet, the very next chapters speak of Israel’s restoration as described in Ezk 34. That is because of the Shepherd’s suffering in this passage (Zch 12:10; 13:7).

Therefore, the intertextual context helps to bring out that Zch 11:4-11 is a pivotal text. It shows that this moment leads Israel to the low point of their judgment in redemptive history. It also hints that this very same moment is the hinge that turns their immense judgment into total restoration and forgiveness. Such intertextuality helps to show the significance of Israel’s rejection of the One who is responsible for ending their exile.

EXPOSITION

The text has three parts, dealing with God’s summons for the prophet to shepherd (11:4-6), the shepherding of Israel (11:7-12), and the significance of God’s judgment (11:13-14).

I. God’s Summons (11:4-6). With the opening words, “Yahweh my God says this,” the prophet introduces divine revelation. It includes God’s instruction to the prophet and His agenda.

A. God’s Instructions (11:4). God calls Zechariah to take on the role as shepherd. This continues the dramatic presentations of the Messiah throughout the book (Zch 3:18; 6:9-15). The specific role of shepherd not only alludes to earlier messianic prophecy (cf. Ezk 34) but also is important in context. Having just decried Israel’s wicked shepherds (cf. Zch 10:2; 11:1-3), the prophet now presents the true Shepherd.

However, the overall agenda is not positive. Zechariah must shepherd “the flock intended for slaughter.” Although sheep are often slaughtered, the Hebrew word (harag) is not used for sacrificial slaughter but for killing.31 This indicates that this flock is destined for God’s judgment.

B. God’s Agenda (11:5-6). Accordingly, the next two verses will discuss the nature of this judgment. The fifth verse walks through the parties involved in the flock’s destruction and shows, at every turn, there is no relief from judgment. The buyers (likely the nations, cf. v. 10) can slaughter without any harm coming to them. People (probably non-governmental leaders in Israel, see next verse) will sell Israelites seemingly with God’s blessing and great profit. Most shocking, Israel’s shepherds (prophet, priest, and king, see above and next verse) have no compassion on the sheep. This is jarring not only because shepherds were to protect their flock but also because the Messiah is supposed to be the shepherd. Why are these shepherds involved? What happened to the good Shepherd? Already the text hints that the good Shepherd was rejected in favor of destructive shepherds, who facilitate the entire chain of events. With that, Israel is betrayed from the start by their leaders and inevitably ends up in judgment.

Verse 6 provides the reason for this. Yahweh has no compassion on His people. He drives this entire process of judgment. Within this process, He ensures that every Israelite will face punishment as He forces them to be turned over to “his neighbor and his king.” That refers to how the sellers and shepherds of the previous verse will take over and sell their countrymen in judgment to the nations. God not only ensures that the judgment is comprehensive but also extensive. The leaders “will devastate the land.” They will cause the land and nation to be in complete ruin. On top of this, God ensures this judgment will be unrelenting. He states, “I will not deliver it from them.” With that, the flock of Israel is indeed intended for the most destructive slaughter.

Overall, these opening verses introduce what is about to take place. Zechariah dramatizes his prediction—that true leader of Israel will come to His people, but somehow He will end up moving the nation to judgment at the hands of their own leaders.

II. Messiah’s Shepherding (11:7-12). Zechariah’s dramatization will demonstrate how what was just described will precisely work out.

A. Positive Shepherding (11:7-9). At first, Zechariah depicts the Messiah’s ministry as positive. The Messiah specifically shepherds “the afflicted of the flock.” He cares about those afflicted.32 Along that line, He takes two staffs, Favor and Union, and shepherds the sheep, which alludes to Ezk 34 and 37:16. The Messiah’s actions show He is the One who will fulfill the promises to bring favor between Israel and God, as well as unity between Israel and Judah.

However, v. 8 shows that this is not what happens. The good Shepherd ultimately destroys three shepherds. As discussed, this action refers to the future overturning of the offices of prophet, priest, and king in “one month,” a short period of time alluding to the rapid turnover in the exile (cf. Jer 52:6-27). The collapse of Jerusalem and its government in 586 BC will happen again. The outcome of the Messiah’s positive work is far different from what was expected.

Why does this happen? As the rest of the verse explains, the good Shepherd is exasperated with the false shepherds and they “detested” Him. Thus, in v. 9, the Messiah declares He will judge His people. He is unwilling to shepherd them any longer and relinquishes the flock to their doom. He states, “let the rest devour each other’s flesh.” This imagery describes how sellers and shepherds (Israel’s leaders) would cannibalistically profit from the destruction of their own people—exactly what was stated in v. 6. Thus, the leaders’ rejection of Messiah pushes the nation in the very direction of judgment that God stated. It also moves the leaders (shepherds) to their own demise (see v. 8).

B. Negative Shepherding (11:10-12). In light of this rejection, the Messiah transitions from shepherding Israel positively to doing so negatively. In verse 10, He takes the staff of Favor and breaks it. As a result, the covenant or agreement God had instituted with the nations is gone. This agreement refers to how God would ensure the nations in the end would support Israel (cf. Gn 12:1-3; Isa 2:2-4). Because God’s favor is gone, so Israel’s peace with the nations is removed. God prepares the nations to judge His people.

Accordingly, v. 11 states “It was annulled on that day.” The language of “on that day” points to a definitive future moment.33 It not only confirms a “future” interpretation of the passage but also that indeed, a pivotal moment has occurred when Israel shifts into the trajectory of judgment.

What happens next solidifies this course. Verse 11 shows that the leaders were not the only cause of Israel’s demise. The entire nation—“the afflicted of the flock”—is also responsible. Zechariah describes the nation as “watching me.” The word “watching” (Hb. shamar) describes guarding someone or watching someone in an unfriendly way (Pss 56:6; 71:10).34 Why would the sheep watch the shepherd in this manner? The implication is the nation itself was hostile to the Messiah, definitively rejecting Him. After all, as noted, Zechariah states that those who did so were particularly “the afflicted of the flock,” the very people the Messiah was shepherding. Even more, these people understood that the judgment that was happening “was the word of the LORD.” Thus, the entire nation joins with their leaders to reject their Savior consciously and without excuse.

Verse 12 confirms this rejection. In seeing the distrust of the oppressed of the flock, the shepherd states “If it seems right to you, give me my wages; but if not, keep them.” The animosity is so clear that the Shepherd does not even require payment to quit His position. In response, the “flock” weighs out “thirty pieces of silver” as His wage. Is this a lot of money? From a financial perspective, this is a hefty sum (cf. Neh 5:15).35 From a social perspective, the amount is designed to be insulting for it is the value of one’s sum profit from a debtor slave (Ex 21:32).36 A shepherd would have produced greater financial gain than that of a slave. The wage then was meant to demean what He had accomplished.37 It demonstrates His spiteful rejection by the people.

At this point, the following picture emerges. The Messiah begins His ministry full of hope and promise (v. 7). However, Israel’s leaders (v. 8b) and the nation itself (v. 11) reject Him. Hence, He ceases His work as shepherd (vv. 9, 12), and subsequently Israel’s false shepherds take control. This will bring not only their own downfall (v. 8a) but the entire nation’s demise (v. 10), turning Israel into a “flock intended for slaughter” (vv. 4-6).

III. The Significance of Judgment (11:13-14). So far, God has shown how the Messiah’s rejection would plunge the nation into judgment (vv. 7-12). He has also shown its destructive nature (vv. 5-6). With the words “the LORD said to me,” God now comments on the theological significance of this judgment.

A. Deeper into Exile (11:13). God commands Zechariah to throw the silver away. Casting the silver aside shows rejection. Such rejection is further seen in sarcastically describing the money as “this magnificent price.” Israel scorned their Messiah and so the Messiah scorns them. Specifically, God rejects the temple as the silver is thrown into “the house of the LORD.” In context, Israel has been rebuilding the temple (cf. Ezr 5:1-2) with the hope that it would conclude exile (cf. Isa 2:2-4; Ezk 40–48). With this act, God rejects such efforts at least for this time. For this reason, the silver is not cast merely to the temple, but also to the potter. As noted, the potter was a figure in Jeremiah denoting exile. This figure helps Israel understand the full significance and severity of their situation. They are not merely going to lack peace (see vv. 5-6, 10) but actually are thrust deeper into the era of exile. That is the complete picture of what was happening.

B. Hope Deferred (11:14). The next verse expounds upon the nature of this exile. The shepherd cut the “second staff, Union, annulling the brotherhood between Judah and Israel.” The reunification of the nation is a hallmark for the end of exile (cf. Ezk 37:17; Zch 11:7). However, such hopes are now put away. Israel is not in the era of resolution but rather deeper into a time when Israel will have no nation, promises will be unfulfilled, and the nation will be under the most austere discipline (cf. Dt 28:48). These consequences are confirmed in the next verses that show Israel on a collision course with the peak of exile, the tribulation (11:15-17). God impresses upon Israel that this single moment will shape the duration of their history.

While the end of this passage is dire, the context establishes the Messiah’s rejection as necessary to atone for Israel’s sin per Isa 53 and Dan 9:24-26. Furthermore, the passage earlier asserts that the shepherd’s original job is to bring Israel’s exile to an end. So, while Israel’s judgment looms immediately, God still remembers His promise of salvation and will use this moment to that end as well (Zch 12:10; 13:1-9). Thus, Zch 11:4-11 is pivotal for all redemptive history in judgment and salvation.

INTERTEXTUAL USAGE

The Gospels show how Jesus’ life fulfills Zch 11:4-11 with remarkable precision. Just as Zechariah prophesied that the Messiah would shepherd the people with Favor and Union (Zch 11:7), so the Gospels describe Jesus as a shepherd (Jn 10:11), who mediates God’s goodness to the people (Jn 10:13-15) and ministers to the whole of Israel (Mt 3:5; Jn 4:1-5). Just as Zechariah described the conflict between the leaders and the Messiah (Zch 11:8), so Jesus confronts hostile leadership (Mt 23:1-6; Lk 23:1-12). Just as Zechariah announced that the Messiah will bring down the leadership in “one month” (Zch 11:8), so Jesus’ rejection leads to AD 70 (cf. Lk 21:20), which repeats the scenario of the fall of Jerusalem and its government that took place in Jeremiah’s day.38 On top of all this, just as Zechariah proclaims, Jesus is betrayed for 30 pieces of silver (Mt 26:15), which is then thrown into the temple (Mt 27:5) and given to the potter (Mt 27:7). With that, Jesus’ life bears out every detail of this text. This not only shows that Jesus fulfills this prophecy but also thoroughly confirms the interpretation given above.

Along that line, the Gospels not only confirm the details of the text but even its intertextuality as outlined above. For instance, Nolland notes that Matthew most likely read Zch 11:4-14 in light of the messianic shepherd imagery of the OT (cf. Mic 5:2; Ezk 34:5; Ps 78:1-72).39 Likewise, Crowe acknowledges that in Mt 27:9, Matthew’s use of Zechariah likely mixes Zechariah with portions of Jer 19.40 This accounts for Matthew’s statement that the prophecy comes from Jeremiah, even though the quotation is mainly from Zechariah (Mt 27:9), 41 demonstrating that this article is not alone in making the above connections. Matthew saw the same links, attesting that they were always intended by Zechariah.

All of this not only confirms the above analysis, but even more, shows that the gospel writers were employing the full theology of Zechariah in their own writings. After all, the intertextuality of Zechariah is what grounds the notions of Messiah, exile, judgment, atonement, and restoration in the passage. By seeing the text in this way, the gospel writers declare that the Messiah’s betrayal will lead Israel into judgment (cf. Mt 27:1-9) and also secure their redemption by His atoning sacrifice (cf. Mt 27:38-54). Seeing the theology of OT prophecy allows one to see the deep theology of the Gospels.

CONCLUSION

Zechariah 11:4-14 is a complex passage. In the end, wading through its challenges allows one to have greater confidence in a messianic interpretation and even more in the theological depth it carries. This text is not merely about the fact of Messiah’s betrayal, but also its importance in redemptive history. It is the pivot point that leads Israel to the height of its judgment in exile and also to fullness of its restoration via the Shepherd stricken for them. Accordingly, Zechariah shows that this moment makes history. The immensity of a single event reflects the power and impact of the central figure of that moment: the Messiah, the rejected Shepherd of Israel.

________________________

1. R. L. Foster, “Shepherds, Sticks, and Social Destabilization: A Fresh Look at Zechariah 11:4-17,” Journal of Biblical Literature 126 (2007): 737.

2. George L. Klein, Zechariah, New American Commentary (Nashville: B&H Publishing, 2008), 323–25; Paul L. Redditt, “Israel’s Shepherds: Hope and Pessimism in Zechariah 9–14,” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 51, no. 4 (1989): 640–42.

3. Foster, “Fresh Look at Zechariah 11:4-17,” 737.

4. Redditt, “Israel’s Shepherds,” 683; Stephen L. Cook, “The Metamorphosis of a Shepherd: The Tradition History of Zechariah 11:17 + 13:7-9,” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 55 (1993): 453.

5. Anthony R. Petterson, “The Shape of the Davidic Hope across the Book of the Twelve,” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 35, no. 2 (December 2010): 229. 6. Klein, Zechariah, 322.

7. Petterson, “Shape of Davidic Hope,” 229.

8. L. Redditt, “The Two Shepherds in Zechariah 11:4-14,” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 55, no. 4 (1993): 687; Cook, “The Metamorphosis of a Shepherd,” 453. If Zch 11:4-11 came from a different source than the rest of the more optimistic book, the shepherd is evil and dashes the hopes of the rest of the book.

9. Redditt, “Israel’s Shepherds,” 634; Douglas R Jones, “Fresh Interpretation of Zechariah 9-11,” Vetus Testamentum 12, no. 3 (July 1962): 252; Samuel I. Feigin, “Some Notes on Zechariah 11:4-17,” Journal of Biblical Literature 44, nos. 3–4 (1925): 205.

10. Michael R. Stead, “The Three Shepherds: Reading Zechariah 11 in the Light of Jeremiah.” In A God of Faithfulness: Essays in Honour of J. Gordon McConville on His 60th Birthday, ed. J. G. McConville, Jamie Grant, Allison Lo, and Gordon J Wenham (New York: T&T Clark, 2011), 154. See also Jones, “Fresh Interpretation of Zechariah 9-11,” 253.

11. Stead, “The Three Shepherds,” 154.

12. Petterson, “Shape of Davidic Hope,” 233; Eugene H. Merrill, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi: An Exegetical Commentary (Chicago: Moody, 1994), 258.

13. Petterson, “Shape of Davidic Hope,” 246.

14. Merrill, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi, 259.

15. Daniel I. Block, The Book of Ezekiel 1–24, New International Commentary on the Old Testament (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1997), 178.

16. Deborah Krause, “The One Who Comes Unbinding the Blessing of Judah: Mark 11:1-10 as a Midrash on Genesis 49:11, Zechariah 9:9, and Psalm 118:25-26,” in Early Christian Interpretation of the Scriptures of Israel: Investigations & Proposals, ed. Craig A. Evans and James A. Sanders (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1997), 141–53; Roy A. Rosenberg, “The Slain Messiah in the Old Testament,” Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 99 (1987): 259–61.

17. Petterson, “Shape of Davidic Hope,” 225–46.

18. See M. G. Kline, “The Structure of the Book of Zechariah,” Journal of Evangelical Theology 34 (1991): 179–83.

19. Klein, Zechariah, 207.

20. Kline, “The Structure of the Book of Zechariah,” 186–93.

21. Klein, Zechariah, 201. 22. Foster, “Fresh Look at Zechariah 11:4-17,” 740.

23. Petterson, “Shape of Davidic Hope,” 229.

24. Dean R. Ulrich, “Two Offices, Four Officers, or One Sordid Event in Zechariah 12:10-14?” Westminister Theological Journal 72, no. 2 (2010): 260–62.

25. Stead, “The Three Shepherds,” 155.

26. F. B. Huey, Jeremiah, Lamentations, New American Commentary (Nashville:

Broadman & Holman, 1993), 181.

27. This also further affirms the notion of the three shepherds as prophet, priest, and king. Just as those offices were undone in the original exile, so they are again in the Messiah’s first advent. See below for the significance of “one month.”

28. Eugene H Merrill, “The Book of Zechariah,” in The World and the Word: An Introduction to the Old Testament, ed. E. H. Merrill, M. F. Rooker, and M. A. Grisanti (Nashville: Broadman and Holman, 2011), 488–89.

29. Kline, “The Structure of the Book of Zechariah,” 179–82.

30. Krause, “The One Who Comes Unbinding,” 149–51.

31. Mark J. Boda, The Book of Zechariah, New International Commentary on the Old Testament (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2016), 660.

32. Ibid., 663.

33. Klein, Zechariah, 336.

34. Boda, The Book of Zechariah, 668.

35. Joyce G. Baldwin, Haggai, Zechariah, Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1972), 184–85.

36. Klein, Zechariah, 337.

37. Merrill, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi, 261.

38. See above for an explanation of “one month.”

39. John Nolland, “The King as Shepherd: The Role of Deutero-Zechariah in Matthew,” in Biblical Interpretation in Early Christian Gospels, 2008, 133–36.

40. Brandon D. Crowe, “Fulfillment in Matthew as Eschatological Reversal,” Westminister Theological Journal 75, no. 1 (2013): 117.

41. Abner Chou, The Hermeneutics of the Biblical Writers: Learning Interpretation from the Prophets and Apostles (Grand Rapids: Kregel, 2018), 140.

FURTHER READING

ISAIAH 7:1-16: IMMANUEL HAS COME!

ISAIAH 9:1-7: THE GOD-CHILD IS BORN!

ZECHARIAH 6:9-15: THE MESSIANIC PRIESTLY-KING

THE DIVINE KING OF KINGS

According to the Hebrew Bible and Jewish tradition, YHWH is the only Lord of lords and King of kings that dwells in heaven above:

“For Yahweh your God is the God of gods and the Lord of lords, the great, the mighty, and the fearsome God who does not show partiality nor take a bribe.” Deuteronomy 10:17

“Give thanks to the Lord of lords, For His lovingkindness endures forever.” Psalm 136:3

“The king answered Daniel and said, “Truly your God is a God of gods and a Lord of kings and a revealer of mysteries since you have been able to reveal this mystery.” Daniel 2:47

“But the King of kings moved Antiochus’ mind against this wicked wretch, and Lysias informed the king that this man was the cause of all mischief, so that the king commanded to bring him unto Berea, and to put him to death, as the manner is in that place.” 2 Maccabees 13:4 LXX

“The Jews, having heard of these events, praised the glorious God and King of kings, because they had obtained this help, too, from him.” 3 Maccabees 13:5 LXX

And yet the inspired NT writings identify the risen Christ as the One who reigns in heaven as the Lord of lords and King of kings!

“I direct you in the presence of God, who gives life to all things, and of Christ Jesus, who testified the good confession before Pontius Pilate, that you keep the commandment without fault or reproach until the appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ, which He will bring about at the proper time—He who is the blessed and ONLY Sovereign, the King of kings and Lord of lords, who ALONE possesses immortality and dwells in unapproachable light, whom no one has seen or can see. To Him be honor and eternal might! Amen.” 1 Timothy 6:13-16

“These will wage war against the Lamb, and the Lamb will overcome them, because He is Lord of lords and King of kings, and those who are with Him are the called and elect and faithful.” Revelation 17:14

“Then I saw heaven opened, and behold, a white horse, and He who sits on it is called Faithful and True, and in righteousness He judges and wages war. His eyes are a flame of fire, and on His head are many diadems; having a name written on Him which no one knows except Himself, and being clothed with a garment dipped in blood, His name is also called The Word of God. And the armies which are in heaven, clothed in fine linen, white and clean, were following Him on white horses. And from His mouth comes a sharp sword, so that with it He may strike down the nations, and He will rule them with a rod of iron; and He treads the wine press of the wrath of the rage of God, the Almighty. And He has on His garment and on His thigh a name written, ‘KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS.’” Revelation 19:11-16

“and from Jesus Christ, the faithful witness, the firstborn of the dead, and the ruler of the kings of the earth. To Him who loves us and released us from our sins by His blood—and He has made us to be a kingdom, priests to His God and Father—to Him be the glory and the might forever and ever. Amen.” Revelation 1:5-6

The Hebrew Bible also states that YHWH alone sits enthroned in heaven since the heavens belong exclusively to him:

“Who is like Yahweh our God, The One who sits on high (LXX en hypselois),” Psalm 113:5

The heavens are the heavens of Yahweh, But the earth He has given to the sons of men.” Psalm 115:16

The OT further proclaims that YHWH’s name alone is exalted on high, and that he is the only heavenly Lord whom believers are to look to:

“Let them praise the name of Yahweh, For His name alone is set on high; His splendor is above earth and heaven.” Psalm 148:13 

“To You I lift up my eyes, The One enthroned in the heavens! Behold, as the eyes of slaves look to the hand of their master, As the eyes of a servant-girl to the hand of her mistress, So our eyes look to Yahweh our God, Until He is gracious to us.” Psalm 123:1-2

However, the NT authors proclaim that Jesus sits enthroned on high alongside the Father and that he possesses the name above every name and authority in all existence:

“and what is the surpassing greatness of His power toward us who believe according to the working of the might of His strength, which He worked in Christ, by raising Him from the dead and seating Him at His right hand in the heavenly places, FAR ABOVE ALL rule and authority and power and dominion, and EVERY NAME that is named, not only in this age but also in the one to come. And He put ALL THINGS in subjection under His feet, and gave Him as head over ALL THINGS to the church, which is His body, the fullness of Him who fills all in all.” Ephesians 1:19-23

“Therefore, God also highly exalted Him, and bestowed on Him the name which is ABOVE EVERY name, so that at the name of Jesus EVERY KNEE will bow, of those who are in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and that EVERY TONGUE will confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.” Philippians 2:9-11  

“who is the radiance of His glory and the exact representation of His nature, and upholds all things by the word of His power; who, having accomplished cleansing for sins, sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high (en hypselois),” Hebrews 1:3

Now the only way for Christ to share in the Father’s reign from heaven and sit enthroned as the heavenly Lord of lord and King of kings is if he is YHWH Almighty who became a Man, being essentially one with the Father. Otherwise, if he were a mere creature then this would mean that the NT contradicts the Hebrew Bible.

FURTHER READING

The Messiah on Yahweh’s Throne Pt. 1, Pt. 2, Addendum

THE NWT TESTIFIES THAT JESUS IS JEHOVAH WHO REIGNS

THE JW BIBLE AFFIRMS: JESUS’ REIGN IS ETERNAL

Jesus Christ – The Sovereign Lord In and From Heaven

The New World Translation Proves Jesus Reigns as Jehovah in Heaven!

Who is the Lord God from heaven that redeems His people?