Category: Uncategorized

TEXTUAL CRITICISM & CHRIST’S DEITY

Modern New Testament textual critics prefer what is typically known as reasoned eclecticism. This position holds to the belief that the earliest papyri, specifically those manuscripts (MSS) classified as the Alexandrian text type, and the major codices (e.g., Sinaiticus, Vaticanus, Alexandrinus etc.) are to be prioritized since this is where the original wordings of the inspired autographs are to be found.

For those who do accept this position I share a particular verse of Scripture, which the majority of textual scholars who hold to the Alexandrian line of textual transmission accept as the original reading, which affirms the essential Deity of Christ. I am referring to the following text from the Prologue to John’s Gospel:  

“No one has ever seen God; the only God (monogenes theos), who is at the Father’s side, he has made him known.” John 1:18 ESV

Here’s how another leading Evangelical translation renders this passage:

“No one has ever seen God. The only one, himself God, who is in closest fellowship with the Father, has made God known.” NET

The NET has a footnote explaining the significance of these Greek expressions:

tn Or “The unique one.” For the meaning of μονογενής (monogenēs) see the note on “one and only” in 1:14.

tc The textual problem μονογενὴς θεός (monogenēs theos, “the only God”) versus ὁ μονογενὴς υἱός (ho monogenēs huios, “the only son”) is a notoriously difficult one. Only one letter would have differentiated the readings in the mss, since both words would have been contracted as nomina sacra: thus qMs or uMs. Externally, there are several variants, but they can be grouped essentially by whether they read θεός or υἱός. The majority of mss, especially the later ones (A C Θ Ψ ƒ M lat), read ὁ μονογενὴς υἱός. P75 א 33 have ὁ μονογενὴς θεός, while the anarthrous μονογενὴς θεός is found in P66 א* B C* L. The articular θεός is almost certainly a scribal emendation to the anarthrous θεός, for θεός without the article is a much harder reading. The external evidence thus strongly supports μονογενὴς θεός. Internally, although υἱός fits the immediate context more readily, θεός is much more difficult. As well, θεός also explains the origin of the other reading (υἱός) because it is difficult to see why a scribe who found υἱός in the text he was copying would alter it to θεός. Scribes would naturally change the wording to υἱός however, since μονογενὴς υἱός is a uniquely Johannine christological title (cf. John 3:16181 John 4:9). But θεός as the older and more difficult reading is preferred. As for translation, it makes the most sense to see the word θεός as in apposition to μονογενής, and the participle ὁ ὤν (ho ōn) as in apposition to θεός, giving in effect three descriptions of Jesus rather than only two. (B. D. Ehrman, The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture, 81, suggests that it is nearly impossible and completely unattested in the NT for an adjective followed immediately by a noun that agrees in gender, number, and case, to be a substantival adjective: “when is an adjective ever used substantivally when it immediately precedes a noun of the same inflection?” This, however, is an overstatement. First, as Ehrman admits, μονογενής in John 1:14 is substantival. And since it is an established usage for the adjective in this context, one might well expect that the author would continue to use the adjective substantivally four verses later. Indeed, μονογενής is already moving toward a crystallized substantival adjective in the NT [cf. Luke 9:38Heb 11:17]; in patristic Greek, the process continued [cf. PGL 881 s.v. 7]. Second, there are several instances in the NT in which a substantival adjective is followed by a noun with which it has complete concord: cf., e.g., Rom 1:30Gal 3:91 Tim 1:92 Pet 2:5.) The modern translations which best express this are the NEB (margin) and TEV. Several things should be noted: μονογενής alone, without υἱός, can mean “only son,” “unique son,” “unique one,” etc. (see 1:14). Furthermore, θεός is anarthrous. As such it carries qualitative force much like it does in 1:1c, where θεὸς ἦν ὁ λόγος (theos ēn ho logos) means “the Word was fully God” or “the Word was fully of the essence of deity.” Finally, ὁ ὤν occurs in Rev 1:484:811:17; and 16:5, but even more significantly in the LXX of Exod 3:14. Putting all of this together leads to the translation given in the text.

tn Grk “in the bosom of” (an idiom for closeness or nearness; cf. L&N 34.18; BDAG 556 s.v. κόλπος 1).

tn Grk “him”; the referent (God) has been specified in the translation for clarity.

sn Has made God known. In this final verse of the prologue, the climactic and ultimate statement of the earthly career of the Logos, Jesus of Nazareth, is reached. The unique One (John 1:14), the One who has taken on human form and nature by becoming incarnate (became flesh1:14), who is himself fully God (the Word was God1:1c) and is to be identified with the ever-living One of the Old Testament revelation (Exod 3:14), who is in intimate relationship with the Father, this One and no other has fully revealed what God is like. As Jesus said to Philip in John 14:9, “The one who has seen me has seen the Father.” (NET Bible https://netbible.org/bible/John+1; emphasis mine)

Thus, according to the reading attested by the two oldest extant MSS of John 1:18 from the third century AD, i.e., P66 and P75, as well as two of the major codices which many textual scholars hold in high esteem, namely, Vaticanus and Sinaiticus, Jesus is the one and only who is fully God in nature.  

I now share a list of some the major English versions, which render the phrase somewhat similarly:

“No one has ever seen God [i.e., His full splendor], but God, the only conceived [and eventually born Son], who is at the Father’s side, has shown us who He is.” AUV

“No one has ever yet seen God. The only begotten God, the One being in the bosom of the Father, He has made Him known.” BLB 

“God no one has ever seen. The only-begotten God, Who is in the bosom of the Father, He unfolds Him.” CLV

“No one has ever seen God. The one and only Son, who is himself God and is at the Father’s side—he has revealed him.” CSB

“No one has ever seen God; God the only Son, who is in the bosom of the Father, he has made him known.” Common

“No one has ever seen God. God the only Son, who is at the Father’s side, has made God known.” CEB

“No one has ever seen God; but the only and unique Son, who is identical with God and is at the Father’s side — he has made him known.” CJB

“No one has ever seen God. The only Son, who is truly God and is closest to the Father, has shown us what God is like.” CEV

“ALOHA no man hath ever seen: the one-begotten God, he who is in the bosom of his Father, he hath declared him.” Etheridge 

“No one has ever seen God. The only Son is the one who has shown us what God is like. He is himself God and is very close to the Father.” ERV

“No one has ever seen God [C God the Father, who is pure spirit; 4:24]. But ·God the only Son [God the one and only; the only Son who is himself GodTGod the only begotten] is ·very close to [by the side of; close to the heart of; T in the bosom of] the Father, and he has ·shown us what God is like [made him known].” EXB

“No man has ever seen God. But God the only Son is very close to the Father. And the Son has shown us what God is like.” ICB

“No one has ever seen God. The uniquely existing God, who is close to the Father’s side, has revealed him.” ISV

“No one has seen God at any time; the one and only, God, the one who is in the bosom of the Father—that one has made him known.” LEB

“No man has ever seen God; God, only begotten, who is in the bosom of the Father—he has interpreted him.” MNT

“Nobody has ever seen God, but God has been unfolded by the divine One, the only Son, who lies upon the Father’s breast.” Moffatt

“No one has ever seen God. The only Son, himself God, the one who is in the bosom of the Father, he has made him known.” MOUNCE

“No man hath ever seen God; the only begotten God, he who is in the bosom of his Father, he hath declared him.” Murdock

“No one has ever seen God. The only Son, God, who is at the Father’s side, has revealed him.” NABRE

“No one has seen God at any time; the only begotten God who is in the bosom of the Father, He has explained Him.” NASB1995

“No one has seen God at any time; God the only Son, who is in the arms of the Father, He has explained Him.” NASB

“No one has ever seen God. It is the only Son, God, who is at the Father’s side, who has made him known.” NCB

“No one has ever seen God. But God the only Son is very close to the Father, and he has shown us what God is like.” NCV

“No one has ever seen God. But the One and Only is God and is at the Father’s side. The one at the Father’s side has shown us what God is like.” NIRV

“No one has ever seen God, but God the One and Only, who is at the Father’s side, has made him known.” NIV 1984 Bible

“No one has ever seen God, but the one and only Son, who is himself God and is in closest relationship with the Father, has made him known.” NIV

“No one has ever seen God. But the unique One, who is himself God, is near to the Father’s heart. He has revealed God to us.” NLT

“No one hath ever seen God; the only begotten God, who is in the bosom of the Father, he hath made him known.” Noyes 

“No one has ever seen God. It is God the only Son, who is close to the Father’s heart, who has made him known.” NRSVCE

“No one has ever seen God. It is the only Son, himself God, who is close to the Father’s heart, who has made him known.” NRSVUE

“No man has ever seen God. The only begotten God-like one who is closest to the Father (in the bosom of the Father) tells us about him. (Psalm 8:5)” NSB

“No one has ever seen Hashem [Ex 33:20]. It is Elohim the Ben Yachid [who shares the nature of Hashem, the Chochman Ben Elohim at his sidesee very importantly Mishle 8:30; 30:4)], it is he, the one being in the kheyk (bosom) of HaAv, this one is Hashem’s definitive midrash (exegesis).” OJB

“No one has ever seen God; God the only Son, who is in the bosom of the Father, he has interpreted him.” Riverside 

“No one, hath seen, God, at any time: An Only Begotten God, The One existing within the bosom of the Father, He, hath interpreted [him].” Rotherham 

“No one has ever seen God; but the one and only God, in the Father’s embrace, has made Him known.” TLV

“No man has ever yet seen God; God the Only Son, who is ever with the Father–He has revealed him.”
Twentieth_Century
 

“No one has ever seen God; the only son, Deity Himself, who lies upon His Father’s breast, has made him known.” Williams

FURTHER READING

JOHN 1:18 REVISITED… AGAIN!

ALMSGIVING & ATONEMENT

In the Greek translation of Daniel, which is longer than the Hebrew version, teaches that almsgiving or giving charity is an atonement for sins:

“Therefore, O king, let my counsel please thee, and atone for thy sins by alms, and [thine] iniquities by compassion on the poor: it may be God will be long-suffering to thy trespasses.” Daniel 4:24 (Greek original according to the text used by the Church of Greece, English translation by L.C.L. Brenton)

This is a point repeated elsewhere in the so-called Apocryphal literature:

“Water will quench a flaming fire; and alms maketh an atonement for sins.” Sirach 3:30

“Give alms of thy substance; and when thou givest alms, let not thine eye be envious, neither turn thy face from any poor, and the face of God shall not be turned away from thee. If thou hast abundance give alms accordingly: if thou have but a little, be not afraid to give according to that little: For thou layest up a good treasure for thyself against the day of necessity. Because that alms do deliver from death, and suffereth not to come into darkness. For alms is a good gift unto all that give it in the sight of the most High.” Tobit 4:7-11

“Prayer is good with fasting and alms and righteousness. A little with righteousness is better than much with unrighteousness. It is better to give alms than to lay up gold: For alms doth deliver from death, and shall purge away all sin. Those that exercise alms and righteousness shall be filled with life:” Tobit 12:8-9

We even find the Apostolic Father and holy Martyr, Polycarp, who was both a disciple of the Apostles such as John and the Bishop of Smyrna, citing Tobit to support the fact that almsgiving saves the believer from death:

Chapter 10. Exhortation to the practice of virtue

Stand fast, therefore, in these things, and follow the example of the Lord, being firm and unchangeable in the faith, loving the brotherhood, 1 Peter 2:17 and being attached to one another, joined together in the truth, exhibiting the meekness of the Lord in your intercourse with one another, and despising no one. When you can do good, defer it not, because alms delivers from death. Tobit 4:10Tobit 12:9 Be all of you subject one to another 1 Peter 5:5 having your conduct blameless among the Gentiles1 Peter 2:12 that you may both receive praise for your good works, and the Lord may not be blasphemed through you. But woe to him by whom the name of the Lord is blasphemedIsaiah 52:5 Teach, therefore, sobriety to all, and manifest it also in your own conduct. (Epistle to the Philippians)

Our Lord himself taught that deeds of love and charity are necessary for salvation, since the lack thereof will result in everlasting destruction:

“But when the Son of Man comes in His glory, and all the angels with Him, then He will sit on His glorious throne. And all the nations will be gathered before Him; and He will separate them from one another, as the shepherd separates the sheep from the goats; and He will put the sheep on His right, and the goats on the left.

“Then the King will say to those on His right, ‘Come, you who are blessed of My Father, inherit the kingdom, which has been prepared for you from the foundation of the world. FOR I was hungry, and you gave Me something to eat; I was thirsty, and you gave Me something to drink; I was a stranger, and you invited Me in; naked, and you clothed Me; I was sick, and you visited Me; I was in prison, and you came to Me.’ Then the righteous will answer Him, saying, ‘Lord, when did we see You hungry, and feed You, or thirsty, and give You something to drink? And when did we see You a stranger, and invite You in, or naked, and clothe You? And when did we see You sick, or in prison, and come to You?’ And the King will answer and say to them, ‘Truly I say to you, to the extent that you did it to one of these brothers of Mine, even the least of them, you did it to Me.’

“Then He will also say to those on His left, ‘Depart from Me, accursed ones, into the eternal fire which has been prepared for the devil and his angels; FOR I was hungry, and you gave Me nothing to eat; I was thirsty, and you gave Me nothing to drink; I was a stranger, and you did not invite Me in; naked, and you did not clothe Me; sick, and in prison, and you did not visit Me.’ Then they themselves also will answer, saying, ‘Lord, when did we see You hungry, or thirsty, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not take care of You?’ Then He will answer them, saying, ‘Truly I say to you, to the extent that you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to Me.’ And these will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life.” Matthew 25:31-46

The blessed Apostle Paul echoes the teachings of the risen Lord when he writes:

“For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision means anything, but faith working through love. You were running well; who hindered you from obeying the truth? 8 This persuasion is not from Him who calls you. A little leaven leavens the whole lump. I have confidence in you in the Lord that you will adopt no other view. But the one who is disturbing you will bear his judgment, whoever he is. But I, brothers, if I still preach circumcision, why am I still persecuted? Then the stumbling block of the cross would have been abolished. I wish that those who are upsetting you would even mutilate themselves. For you were called to freedom, brothers; only do not turn your freedom into an opportunity for the flesh, but through love serve one another. For the whole Law is fulfilled in one word, in this: ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’ But if you bite and devour one another, beware that you are not consumed by one another.” Galatians 5:6-15

FURTHER READING

IGNATIUS, POLYCARP & SOLA FIDE

THE BIBLE’S CODED MESSAGES

In this post I will share a way in which God provides clues that the Scriptures are inspired by the Holy Spirit by taking the case of John the Baptist and his parents and the implication of their names.

Here’s what Luke writes in regards to the lineage and situation of the Baptist’s parents and the annunciation of his upcoming birth:

“In the days of Herod, king of Judea, there was a priest named Zechariah, of the division of Abijah, and he had a wife from the daughters of Aaron, and her name was Elizabeth. And they were both righteous in the sight of God, walking blamelessly in all the commandments and righteous requirements of the Lord. But they had no child, because Elizabeth was barren, and they were both advanced in years.” Luke 1:5-7

And:

“And an angel of the Lord appeared to him, standing to the right of the altar of incense. And Zechariah was troubled when he saw the angel, and fear fell upon him. But the angel said to him, ‘Do not be afraid, Zechariah, for your prayer has been heard, and your wife Elizabeth will bear you a son, and you will call his name John. And you will have joy and gladness, and many will rejoice at his birth. For he will be great in the sight of the Lord; and he will not drink any wine or strong drink, and he will be filled with the Holy Spirit while yet in his mother’s womb. And he will turn many of the sons of Israel back to the Lord their God. And he will go before Him in the spirit and power of Elijah, to turn the hearts of the fathers back to the children, and the disobedient to the attitude of the righteous, to make ready a people prepared for the Lord.’” Luke 1:11-17

The name Zechariah in Hebrew means “remembered by Yah,” or Yahweh remembered:

Zekaryah

Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance

Zachariah, Zechariah

Or Zkaryahuw {zek-ar-yaw’-hoo}; from zakar and Yahh; Jah has remembered; Zecarjah, the name of twenty-nine Israelites — Zachariah, Zechariah.

see HEBREW zakar

Strong’s Concordance

zakar: remember

Original Word: זָכַר

Part of Speech: Verb

Transliteration: zakar

Phonetic Spelling: (zaw-kar’)

Definition: remember

see HEBREW Yahh

Strong’s Concordance

Yah: the name of the God of Israel

Original Word: יָהּ

Part of Speech: Proper Name

Transliteration: Yah

Phonetic Spelling: (yaw)

Definition: the name of the God of Israel

Elizabeth’s Hebrew name means “(my) God of an/the oath”:

Elisheba

Strong’s Concordance

Elisheba: “God is an oath,” the wife of Aaron

Original Word: אֱלִישֶׁבַע

Part of Speech: Proper Name Feminine

Transliteration: Elisheba

Phonetic Spelling: (el-ee-sheh’-bah)

Definition: “God is an oath”, the wife of Aaron

NAS Exhaustive Concordance

Word Origin

from el and shaba

Definition

“God is an oath,” the wife of Aaron

NASB Translation

Elisheba (1).

Brown-Driver-Briggs

אֱלִישֶׁ֫בַע proper name, feminine (God is an oath, by which one swears, compare Isaiah 19:18Amos 8:14Zephaniah 1:5) wife of Aaron Exodus 6:23; = Ἐλεισαβεθ ᵐ5, compare Luke 1:7.

And here’s the meaning of John’s Hebrew name:

Yochanan

Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance

Johanan

A form of Yhowchanan; Jochanan, the name of nine Israelites — Johanan.

see HEBREW Yhowchanan

Strong’s Concordance

Yehochanan: “the LORD has been gracious,” the name of a number of Isr., also a son of Tobiah

Original Word: יְהוֹחָנָן

Part of Speech: Proper Name Masculine

Transliteration: Yehochanan

Phonetic Spelling: (yeh-ho-khaw-nawn’)

Definition: “the LORD has been gracious”, the name of a number of Isr., a lso a son of Tobiah

NAS Exhaustive Concordance

Word Origin

from Yhvh and chanan

Definition

“the LORD has been gracious,” the name of a number of Isr., also a son of Tobiah

This is how one lexicon defines Hebrew term chanan:

chanan

Strong’s Concordance

chanan: beseech

Original Word: חָנַן

Part of Speech: Verb

Transliteration: chanan

Phonetic Spelling: (khaw-nan’)

Definition: to show favor, be gracious

Brown-Driver-Briggs

I. חָנַן verb shew favour, be gracious (Late Hebrew id., Aramaic חֲנַן ; Arabic  yearn towards, long for, be merciful, compassionate, favourable, inclined towards; Sabean חן in proper name חן מסבררהם DHMEpigr. Denkm. 40; Phoenician חנן in חן favour, and proper name as אלחנן, חננבעל; Assyrian in derivatives annugrace, favourunninu, têninu nannuid., LotzTP ZimBP 23, 66) —

Note again the meaning of these names: Zechariah (“Yah remembers”), Elizabeth (“God of an oath”), John (“Yahweh has been merciful/compassionate/gracious”).

With the foregoing in perspective notice what the Holy Spirit inspired Zechariah to say after his son John was born:

“And his father Zechariah was filled with the Holy Spirit, and prophesied, saying: ‘Blessed be the Lord God of Israel, For He visited and accomplished redemption for His people, And raised up a horn of salvation for us In the house of David His servant—As He spoke by the mouth of His holy prophets from of old—Salvation from our enemies, And from the hand of all who hate us, To show mercy (heleos) toward our fathers, And to remember His holy covenant, The oath which He swore to Abraham our father, To grant us that we, being rescued from the hand of our enemies, Might serve Him without fear, In holiness and righteousness before Him all our days. And you, child, will be called the prophet of the Most High, For you will go on before the Lord to make ready His ways, To give to His people the knowledge of salvation By the forgiveness of their sins, Because of the tender mercy of our God, With which the Sunrise from on high will visit us, To shine upon those who sit in darkness and the shadow of death, To direct our feet into the way of peace.’” Luke 1:67-79

The Greek term for mercy also means compassion:

Strong’s Greek 1656

eleos: mercy, pity, compassion

Original Word: ἔλεος, ους, τό

Part of Speech: Noun, Masculine; Noun, Neuter

Transliteration: eleos

Phonetic Spelling: (el’-eh-os)

Definition: mercy, pity, compassion

Usage: pity, mercy, compassion.

Here’s where we see the Spirit at work:

“To show mercy (Jochanan) toward our fathers, And to remember (Zekaryah) His holy covenant, The oath (Elisheba) which He swore to Abraham our father,” Luke 1:72-73

It is apparent that the Spirit moved Zechariah to employ the phrases “mercy,” “remember,” and “oath,” in order to make the connection with the names of John and his parents. The Baptist and his parents were all signs of God’s having remembered the oath he had made to the fathers which he was now graciously fulfilling though the miraculous birth of John, whom God appointed to be the forerunner to the Messiah Jesus!

FURTHER READING

The Revelation of the Gospel in Adam’s Genealogy

EARLY CHURCH ON AGE OF CREATION

By Ben Kissingly

Historical references:

“They are deceived, too, by those highly mendacious documents which profess to give the history of many thousand years, though, reckoning by the sacred writings, we find that not 6000 years have yet passed.”

St. Augustine, City of God, Book XII, chapter 10, “Of the Falseness of the History Which Allots Many Thousand Years to the World’s Past”, 426 A.D. https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/120112.htm

“All the years from the creation of the world amount to a total of 5698 years, and the odd months and days.”

Theophilus of Antioch, To Autolycus, Book III, Chapter XXVIII, Leading Chronological Epochs, ~180 A.D. http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/theophilus-book3.html

“After these statements, Celsus, from a secret desire to cast discredit upon the Mosaic account of the creation, which teaches that the world is not yet ten thousand years old, but very much under that…But let this assailant of the Christian faith tell us by what arguments he was compelled to accept [this].”

Origen, Contra Celsum, Book I, Chapter XIX, 248 A.D. http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/origen161.html

“The period, then, to the advent of the Lord from Adam and the creation is 5531 years…”

Julius Africanus, Chronography, Fragment 18:4, 221 A.D. https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0614.htm

From the birth of Christ, then, we must reckon the 500 years that remain to make up the 6000, and thus the end shall be.”

Hippolytus of Rome, Fragments, On Daniel II:4-6, ~ 205 A.D. https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0502.htm

“Now twenty-four hours fill up the space of one day — we mean of a day and of a night; and if, at the time of the solstices, they have not both an equal length, the time marked by Scripture does not the less circumscribe their duration.”

Basil, Hexaemeron, Homily II:8 , ~370 A.D. (commentary on Gen. 1:5) https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/32012.htm

“For me grass is grass; plant, fish, wild beast, domestic animal, I take all in the literal sense…Let us hear Scripture as it has been written.”

St. Basil, Hexaemeron, Homily IX:1 https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/32019.htm

“His own Word is both suitable and sufficient for the formation of all things, even as John, the disciple of the Lord, declares regarding Him: “All things were made by Him, and without Him was nothing made.” Now, among the “all things” our world must be embraced. It too, therefore, was made by His Word, as Scripture tells us in the book of Genesis that He made all things connected with our world by His Word. David also expresses the same truth: “For He spake, and they were made; He commanded, and they were created.”

Whom, therefore, shall we believe as to the creation of the world – these heretics who have been mentioned that prate so foolishly and inconsistently on the subject, or the disciples of the Lord, and Moses, who was both a faithful servant of God and a prophet? He at first narrated the formation of the world in these words: “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth,” and all other things in succession: but neither gods nor angels.

Now, that this God is the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, Paul the apostle also has declared, “There is one God, the Father, who is above all, and through all things, and in us all.” I have indeed proved already that there is only one God; but I shall further demonstrate this from the apostles themselves, and from the discourses of the Lord. For what sort of conduct would it be, were we to forsake the utterances of the prophets, of the Lord, and of the apostles, that we might give heed to these persons, who speak not a word of sense?”

Irenaeus, Against Heresies, Book II, Chapter XXVIII, Perfect Knowledge Cannot Be Attained in the Present Life: Many Questions Must Be Submissively Left in the Hands of God, Part 2,~180 A.D. https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0103228.htm

“If, however, we cannot discover explanations of all those things in Scripture which are made the subject of investigations, yet let us not on that account seek after any other God besides Him who really exists. For this is the very greatest impiety. We should leave things of that nature to God who created us, being most properly assured that the Scriptures are indeed perfect, since they were spoken by the Word of God and His Spirit: but we, inasmuch as we are inferior to, and later in existence than, the Word of God and His Spirit, are on that very account destitute of the knowledge of His mysteries. And there is no cause for wonder if this is the case with us as respects things spiritual and heavenly, and such as require to be made known to us by revelation, since many even of those things which lie at our very feet (I mean such as belong to this world, which we handle, and see, and are in close contact with) transcend our knowledge, so that even those we must leave to God.

For it is fitting that He should excel all. For how stands the case, for instance, if we endeavour to explain the cause of the rising of the Nile? We may say a great deal, plausible or otherwise, on the subject; but what is true, sure, and incontrovertible regarding it, belongs only to God. Then, again, the dwelling-place of birds – of those, I mean, which come to us in spring, but fly away again on the approach of autumn – though it is a matter connected with this world, escapes our knowledge. What explanation, again, can we give of the flow and ebb of the ocean, although every one admits there must be a certain cause? Or what can we say as to the nature of those things which lie beyond it? What, moreover, can we say as to the formation of rain, lightning, thunder, gatherings of clouds, vapours, the bursting forth of winds, and such like things; of tell as to the storehouses of snow, hail, and other like things? [What do we know respecting] the conditions requisite for the preparation of clouds, or what is the real nature of the vapours in the sky? What as to the reason why the moon waxes and wanes, or what as to the cause of the difference of nature among various waters, metals, stones, and such like things? On all those points we may indeed say a great deal while we search into their causes, but God alone who made them can declare the truth regarding them.”

Irenaeus, Against Heresies, Book II, Chapter II, The World Was Not Formed by Angels, or by Any Other Being, Contrary to the Will of the Most High God, But Was Made by the Father Through the Word, Part 5, ~180 A.D. https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0103202.htm

“For in as many days as this world was made, in so many thousand years shall it be concluded. And for this reason the Scripture says: “Thus the heaven and the earth were finished, and all their adornment. And God brought to a conclusion upon the sixth day the works that He had made; and God rested upon the seventh day from all His works.” This is an account of the things formerly created, as also it is a prophecy of what is to come. For the day of the Lord is as a thousand years; and in six days created things were completed: it is evident, therefore, that they will come to an end at the sixth thousand year.”

Irenaeus, Against Heresies, Book 5, Chapter XXVIII:3 ~ 180 A.D. www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/irenaeus-book5.html

Athenogoras, A Plea for Christians, Chapter XV, The Christians Distinguish God from Matter, 177 A.D. https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf02.v.ii.xv.html

Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica, First Part, Question 91, Article 2, Whether the human body was immediately produced by God, ~1270 A.D. https://www.ccel.org/ccel/aquinas/summa.FP_Q91_A2.html

Lactantius, The Divine Institutues, Book II, Chapter XII, That Animals Were Not Produced Spontaneously, But by a Divine Arrangement, of Which God Would Have Given Us the Knowledge, If It Were Advantageous for Us to Know It, ~310 A.D. https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf07.iii.ii.ii.xii.html

The following citations can be found here: https://www.catholic.com/tract/creation-and-genesis.

Clement of Alexandria

“And how could creation take place in time, seeing time was born along with things which exist? . . . That, then, we may be taught that the world was originated and not suppose that God made it in time, prophecy adds: ‘This is the book of the generation, also of the things in them, when they were created in the day that God made heaven and earth’ [Gen. 2:4]. For the expression ‘when they were created’ intimates an indefinite and dateless production” (Miscellanies 6:16 [A.D. 208]).

Justin Martyr

“For as Adam was told that in the day he ate of the tree he would die, we know that he did not complete a thousand years [Gen. 5:5]. We have perceived, moreover, that the expression ‘The day of the Lord is a thousand years’ [Ps. 90:4] is connected with this subject” (Dialogue with Trypho the Jew 81 [A.D. 155]).

Irenaeus

“And there are some, again, who relegate the death of Adam to the thousandth year; for since ‘a day of the Lord is a thousand years,’ he did not overstep the thousand years, but died within them, thus bearing out the sentence of his sin” (Against Heresies 5:23:2 [A.D. 189]).

Origen

“For who that has understanding will suppose that the first and second and third day existed without a sun and moon and stars and that the first day was, as it were, also without a sky? . . . I do not suppose that anyone doubts that these things figuratively indicate certain mysteries, the history having taken place in appearance and not literally” (The Fundamental Doctrines 4:1:16 [A.D. 225]).

“The text said that ‘there was evening and there was morning’; it did not say ‘the first day,’ but said ‘one day.’ It is because there was not yet time before the world existed. But time begins to exist with the following days” (Homilies on Genesis [A.D. 234]).

“And with regard to the creation of the light upon the first day . . . and of the [great] lights and stars upon the fourth . . . we have treated to the best of our ability in our notes upon Genesis, as well as in the foregoing pages, when we found fault with those who, taking the words in their apparent signification, said that the time of six days was occupied in the creation of the world” (Against Celsus 6:60 [A.D. 248]).

Cyprian

“The first seven days in the divine arrangement contain seven thousand years” (Treatises 11:11 [A.D. 250]).

“…six thousand years are now nearly completed since the devil first attacked man.” Treatises 11, Preface 2.

Victorinus

“God produced the entire mass for the adornment of his majesty in six days. On the seventh day, he consecrated it with a blessing” (On the Creation of the World [A.D. 280]).

Lactantius

“Therefore let the philosophers, who enumerate thousands of ages from the beginning of the world, know that the six-thousandth year is not yet complete. . . . Therefore, since all the works of God were completed in six days, the world must continue in its present state through six ages, that is, six thousand years. For the great day of God is limited by a circle of a thousand years, as the prophet shows, who says, ‘In thy sight, O Lord, a thousand years are as one day [Ps. 90:4]’” (Divine Institutes 7:14 [A.D. 307]).

Basil The Great

“‘And there was evening and morning, one day.’ Why did he say ‘one’ and not ‘first’? . . . He said ‘one’ because he was defining the measure of day and night . . . since twenty-four hours fill up the interval of one day” (The Six Days Work 1:1–2 [A.D. 370]).

Ambrose of Milan

“Scripture established a law that twenty-four hours, including both day and night, should be given the name of day only, as if one were to say the length of one day is twenty-four hours in extent. . . . The nights in this reckoning are considered to be component parts of the days that are counted. Therefore, just as there is a single revolution of time, so there is but one day. There are many who call even a week one day, because it returns to itself, just as one day does, and one might say seven times revolves back on itself” (Hexaemeron [A.D. 393]).

Augustine

“It not infrequently happens that something about the earth, about the sky, about other elements of this world, about the motion and rotation or even the magnitude and distances of the stars, about definite eclipses of the sun and moon, about the passage of years and seasons, about the nature of animals, of fruits, of stones, and of other such things, may be known with the greatest certainty by reasoning or by experience, even by one who is not a Christian. It is too disgraceful and ruinous, though, and greatly to be avoided, that he [the non-Christian] should hear a Christian speaking so idiotically on these matters, and as if in accord with Christian writings, that he might say that he could scarcely keep from laughing when he saw how totally in error they are. In view of this and in keeping it in mind constantly while dealing with the book of Genesis, I have, insofar as I was able, explained in detail and set forth for consideration the meanings of obscure passages, taking care not to affirm rashly some one meaning to the prejudice of another and perhaps better explanation” (The Literal Interpretation of Genesis 1:19–20 [A.D. 408]).

“With the scriptures it is a matter of treating about the faith. For that reason, as I have noted repeatedly, if anyone, not understanding the mode of divine eloquence, should find something about these matters [about the physical universe] in our books, or hear of the same from those books, of such a kind that it seems to be at variance with the perceptions of his own rational faculties, let him believe that these other things are in no way necessary to the admonitions or accounts or predictions of the scriptures. In short, it must be said that our authors knew the truth about the nature of the skies, but it was not the intention of the Spirit of God, who spoke through them, to teach men anything that would not be of use to them for their salvation” (ibid., 2:9).

“Seven days by our reckoning, after the model of the days of creation, make up a week. By the passage of such weeks time rolls on, and in these weeks one day is constituted by the course of the sun from its rising to its setting; but we must bear in mind that these days indeed recall the days of creation, but without in any way being really similar to them” (ibid., 4:27).

“[A]t least we know that it [the Genesis creation day] is different from the ordinary day with which we are familiar” (ibid., 5:2).

“For in these days [of creation] the morning and evening are counted until, on the sixth day, all things which God then made were finished, and on the seventh the rest of God was mysteriously and sublimely signalized. What kind of days these were is extremely difficult or perhaps impossible for us to conceive, and how much more to say!” (The City of God 11:6 [A.D. 419]).

“We see that our ordinary days have no evening but by the setting [of the sun] and no morning but by the rising of the sun, but the first three days of all were passed without sun, since it is reported to have been made on the fourth day. And first of all, indeed, light was made by the word of God, and God, we read, separated it from the darkness and called the light ‘day’ and the darkness ‘night’; but what kind of light that was, and by what periodic movement it made evening and morning, is beyond the reach of our senses; neither can we understand how it was and yet must unhesitatingly believe it” (ibid., 11:7).

“They [pagans] are deceived, too, by those highly mendacious documents which profess to give the history of [man as] many thousands of years, though reckoning by the sacred writings we find that not 6,000 years have yet passed” (ibid., 12:10).

“Now, eighteen months after the first light, three months after the true day, but a very few days after the pure Sun of that most wonderful study began to shine, nothing restrains me; it is my pleasure to taunt mortal men with the candid acknowledgment that I am stealing the golden vessels of the Egyptians to build a tabernacle to my God from them, far, far away from the boundaries of Egypt. If you forgive me, I shall rejoice; if you are enraged with me, I shall bear it. See, I cast the die, and I write the book. Whether it is to be read by the people of the present or of the future makes no difference: let it await its reader for a hundred years, if God Himself has stood ready for six thousand years for one to study Him.”

Johannes Kepler, Book V, The Harmony of the World, 1619 A.D.

Sources:

1. “The Funeral of a Great Myth”, C.S. Lewis, https://fpb.livejournal.com/297710.html

(This essay and “Modern Theology and Biblical Criticism” are in the Walter Hooper edited collection “Christian Reflections.”

2. “Dr. Craig on Collins vs Dawkins on Design of the Universe”, Reasonable Faith Podcast transcript, https://www.reasonablefaith.org/media/reasonable-faith-podcast/dr.-craig-on-collins-vs-dawkins-on-design-of-universe/

3. “Hermeneutical vs Scientific Young Earth Creationism”, Reasonable Faith Question of the Week #605, https://www.reasonablefaith.org/writings/question-answer/hermeneutical-vs-scientific-young-earth-creationism/

4. Craig, William Lane. Defenders 3: Excursus on Creation of Life and Biological Diversity. https://www.reasonablefaith.org/podcasts/defenders-podcast-series-3/excursus-on-creation-of-life-and-biological-diversity/

5. “Mining for God | There is Truth Beyond Science”, drcraigvideos youtube channel, https://youtu.be/Fpq1bPoopaA

FURTHER READING

THE EARLY CHURCH ON CHRIST’S THOUSAND YEAR REIGN