Tag: quran

A Coptic Convert Exposes Muhammad Pt. 5

I come to the finale in this series: A Coptic Convert Exposes Muhammad Pt. 4.

CONTRADICTIONS GALORE

As I stated previously, Ibn Raja’s knowledge and mastery of the Islamic sources are simply amazing. This will be further confirmed here by his awareness of all the irreconcilable contradictions within the Quran and hadith literature. The following quotes are taken from David Bertaina’s book Būluṣ ibn Rajāʾ The Fatimid Egyptian Convert Who Shaped Christian Views of Islam, pp. 213-241, 285-291, and 307-309. All will be emphasis mine.

Chapter 18

[135] On the Qurʾan’s contradiction; some verses contradict each other.

[136] He said to them in many places in the Qurʾan: “We have indeed created the Heavens and the earth.” So he started with the creation of Heaven before the earth. If he didn’t say anything more specific about the creation of the Heavens and the earth, then this sentence would have many ways to fully inflect it, regarding the words’ and languages’ meanings. Either he created the earth before Heaven or he created Heaven before the earth or he created the two of them at the same time and as one word. But he said something else so his mistake became clear. He said in sura “The Snatchers”: “Are you a more difficult creation or is Heaven? He built it. He raised its roof and He fashioned it. He darkened its night and He brought forth its morning light. After that He spread the earth.”292 So he clarified for them that God created Heaven, then He created the earth after it. Then he said after that in sura “Ḥāʾ Mīm Prostration” what contradicts that. He said: “Say: Do you indeed [disbelieve] in the one who created the earth in two days and attribute equals to Him? That is the Lord of the worlds. He placed on it firm mountains above it, and He blessed it and decreed for it its sustenance in four days equally for those who ask. Then He went up to Heaven while it was smoke. He said to it and to the earth, ‘Come willingly or by coercion’. They said, ‘We have come willingly’.”293 So this verse contradicts the one that came before [in my example]. Then he said in sura “The Cow”: “He is the one who created for you all of [that which] is on the earth. Then He went up to Heaven, and made them into seven Heavens.”294 He also started with the earth’s creation in this sura. He said in sura “Qāf”: “We did indeed create the Heavens and earth and what is between them in six days, while no tiredness touched Us.”295 How strange is this! He is saying in another place that God created Heaven before the earth, with one remark contradicting the other. Verses are contradicted by [another] verse.

[137296] He said in sura “The Heights”: “We will surely question those to whom it was sent, and We will surely question the messengers.”297 He said in surat “al-Ḥijr”: “So by your Lord, We will surely question all of them about what they were doing.”298 So these two verses show that questions [regarding judgment] are inevitable for all creation, including a prophet, and those who fear [God], and unbelievers. Then he contradicted that, when he said in sura “Certainly the Believers have succeeded”: “When the horn is blown, there will be no relationship between them that day, nor will they ask about one another.”299 He said in sura “The Family of ʿImrān”: “Those who exchange God’s covenant and their oaths for a small price will have no share in the hereafter, and God will not speak to them or look at them on the Day of Resurrection, nor will he purify them.”300 What does this statement have to do with his words: “So by your Lord, we will surely question all of them about what they were doing,” meaning the believers and the unbelievers. This is an inconsistency and a contradiction; a verse contradicted with another.301

[138] He said in sura “Mary”: “Every one of you will come to it. It is your Lord’s inevitable decree” – meaning Gehenna – “then we will save those who feared God [and leave] the wrongdoers on their knees within it.”302 This verse shows that for all creatures it is inevitable that they will bow before Gehenna and see it. He saves those who are God-fearing and he leaves the wrongdoers in it for a while. In addition to that, they have a well-known hadith from their prophet that said: “It is inevitable that all creatures will bow to Gehenna, from an angel close [to God] to a prophet sent with a message. Even if someone on the Day [of Resurrection] has done the righteous works of seventy prophets, he should still think that he will not be saved from the fire of Gehenna.”303 Then he contradicted that when he said at the end of sura “The Prophets”: “[For] the ones who have received the best outcome from Us; those ones are far removed from [Gehenna]. They will not hear its sound.”304 What does this remark have to do with his statement, “Every one of you will come to [Gehenna]. It is your Lord’s inevitable decree”? He alleges that these are God’s words to him, and that God said to him: “Every one of you will come to it” – meaning him, and his companions, and all creatures. In addition to that is the hadith which we have already mentioned. What a great difference between these words and his statement: “Those ones are far removed from [Gehenna]. They will not hear its slightest sound.” This is a contradiction and an inconsistency; one verse contradicts another verse, and the consensus, and what is clear.

[139] He said in sura “The Cow”: “Remember when we said to the angels, ‘Bow before Adam’. So they bowed, except for Iblīs.305 He refused and became arrogant.”306 He repeated that in many places in the Qurʾan. That demonstrates that Iblīs was one of the angels. That is accepted as true by all people without a doubt. There is no disagreement that he was an angel. But he contradicted that and he disagreed with the consensus and what is clear. For he said in sura “The Cave”: “[Remember] when we said to the angels, ‘Bow to Adam’. They bowed except for Iblīs. He was from the jinn and disobeyed his Lord’s command.”307 That Iblīs would be from the jinn is clearly impossible to everyone. Rather, Iblīs was among the angels and among their greatest noble ones. Suppose Iblīs was from the jinn, and he was not among the angels, and God commanded the angels to bow to Adam – according to your impossible claim – so therefore all of the angels bowed and Iblīs did not bow. There was no blame in his refusing to bow, since he was not an angel. If he bowed with the angels, he would have been a sinner doing something other than what he was commanded. Because, God commanded the angels to bow and they did so while Iblīs was not commanded to bow, since he was not from the angels. You have ascribed injustice to God for his anger against Iblīs, because we do not see what necessitates his anger as you say. This is a contradiction and an inconsistency; one verse contradicts another verse.

[140] He said in sura “The Bees”: “God commands justice and good conduct and giving to relatives and forbids immorality and bad conduct and oppression.”308 Then he contradicted this remark when he said in sura “The People of Israel”: “When We want to destroy a city, We command its prosperous”309 – meaning its nobles and those who possess wealth – “to act sinfully within it. So the verdict is confirmed upon it, and We destroy it completely,” so they came to an end. He says in one place that God commanded justice and charity. He says in [another] place that God made a command to act sinfully. Many of the Qurʾan’s leading scholars vehemently denied this verse, because the verse guides him to a different meaning. Namely, [they] read it: “When We want to destroy his city, We give authority to its prosperous ones,” derived from the word for an emir. It means: “When We want to destroy his city, We bring authority to its kings. If they became emirs and were unjust in their emirate, then We would destroy them and We would make them perish.” Only one person made this reading, and no one else, and no one agreed with him about this verse. He said in sura “The Heights”: “When they commit a sinful act, they say: ‘We found our fathers doing it, and God commanded us to do it’. Say: ‘God does not command sinful acts. Do you say about God that which you do not know?’”310 A verse is contradicted with the hadith and those who listen and reason.

[141] He said in sura “The Moon”: “The Hour has come near and the moon has split.”311 The commentators agreed about this verse that one night he was sitting with his companions, and he looked at the moon and its circular shape was divided. His companions said to him: “Muḥammad, show us a sign that we might be amazed by it.” So he looked up to the sky and he pointed at the moon with his index and middle finger. Then he said to it: “Split, moon.” Then it split in two, so one half fell upon Abū Qubays Mountain and another part [fell] upon the Red Mountain.312 These are two mountains in Mecca and Mecca is between them in the middle. However, the two of them were named “the interior of Mecca.” When they saw the moon had fallen from the sky upon the two mountains, they were amazed at that.313 He mentioned that in the Qurʾan; he said: “The Hour has come near and the moon has split.”314

[142] This is one of the greatest lies and untruths. If that were true, then it would not have been hidden from all creatures, not from the Christians and the Jews and the rest of the religious groups. Rather, if that were the case, then people would have mentioned it in their books and that which is clear in [Muḥammad’s] biography. In addition, that would have been famous for everyone who is devoted to knowledge of the stars and [their] orbits, and especially the Hindus and the Sabians who are the masters of this science. But we have not seen even one of those [groups] mention it. It was not communicated in the reports that any of your opponents converted to Islam when that happened. Since a number of gullible and ignorant people had converted to Islam without him showing them a sign, then it should seem to require that many people would have converted to Islam at that time. But we don’t see that, and no poet mentioned that in verses of praise or ridicule. This is a lie and impossible and the statement is refuted.

[143] Another proof testifying that it is a lie and impossible is what al-Ḥasan ibn Rashīq al-ʿAskarī315 reported to me [from] Abū Bishr al-Dūlābī316 from Abū ʿAbd al-Raḥmān al-Shaybānī al-Nasāʾī317 from Qutayba ibn Saʿīd,318 [from] Mālik,319 from Hishām ibn ʿUrwa320 from his father321 that he said: “I asked Ibn ʿAbbās322 and I said to him: ‘Tell me about this moon and how big it is’. So he said: ‘I heard Muḥammad say that this moon was eighteen times as big as the entire world’.”323 Think about it, my brother – may God help you – this impossibility has no truth to it. They allege that the moon was eighteen times as long as the whole world. They allege that it fell between two [mountains] – upon Abū Qubays Mountain and the Red Mountain, and they are in Mecca. How can these two mountains encompass this great moon which is eighteen times as big as the whole world? If they reflect on this, then [this argument] would be convincing for them. One verse [of the Qurʾan] is contradicted by the hadith and logical analogy.

[144] He said in sura “The Cow”: “How can you not believe in God when you were dead and He brought you to life; then He will cause you to die, then He will bring you back to life.”324 These words say that God created all people from the children of Adam and that He caused them to die and He brought them back to life, and this is among its best words, there is no doubt about it.325 But a hadith emerged that contradicted this verse. It was what Sufyān al-Thawrī326 reported from Hishām ibn ʿUrwa327 from his father,328 from ʿĀʾisha that she said: I heard Muḥammad say: “Every one of the children of Adam, when he dies, two angels will come to him at the hour when people finish burying him and go away from him. The name of one of them is Munkar and the other one is Nakīr.329 They will seize the dead by the beard and if she was a woman, seize [her] by her bangs. They seat them while wearing the shroud. God will give his soul back to him so he will live just as he used to. The two of them will say to him: ‘Who is your Lord and who is your prophet and what is your religion?’ So if he says: ‘God is my Lord and Muḥammad is my prophet and Islam is my religion’, the two of them will open a window at his head which leads to Paradise. The two of them will say to him: ‘Smell the fragrance of the living Paradise and its breeze and enjoy its food and drink and pleasant things until the Day of Resurrection’. And if he said to the two of them: ‘I don’t recognize them or what you are saying and I don’t know’, then they will strike him, which will send that one down [the length of] seven earths. Then the two of them will bring him up and open [a window] at his head which leads to Hell. They will say to him: ‘You will remain in this state until the day – the Day of Resurrection’.”

[145] These are impossible words, and it contradicts the Qurʾan, because he said: “You were dead and He brought you to life; then he will cause you to die, then he will bring you back to life.”330 He only mentioned one death in the Qurʾan, nothing else. He said in this hadith that we reported that he lives after his death in order to be questioned by the two angels. Then he dies another death, then he lives on the Day of Resurrection. He said in sura “The Smoke”: “They will not taste death except for the first death.”331 He should have said: “Except the first two deaths.” This is a contradiction from his statement and an inconsistency.332

[146] Stranger than that is his statement that the two angels open a window at the head of the dead which leads to Paradise. They say to him: “Smell the fragrance of Paradise and its breeze and enjoy its food and drink and pleasant things until the Day of Resurrection.” According to reason and logic, how can he open a window on earth connected to Paradise when you don’t know Paradise’s location? You can’t find a place for it. Because he said to you in the Qurʾan in sura “The Family of ʿImrān”: “Paradise [is] as wide as the Heavens and earth.”333 So how can it be either on earth or in Heaven? If the seven Heavens334 are its width, then what about [its] length? How can a dead [man], who is a discarded corpse after his bones have decomposed and been burned,335 be able to eat and drink and smell and enjoy pleasant things? What does he smell when his two nasal passages become pus and his eyes are drooped and his joints are disconnected and he becomes clay? How can people eat and drink in their tombs? If that were the case, then they are not dead. If you say that the spirit eats in Paradise and drinks and enjoys things, then that would be better for your lies. How can you say that, when he said to you in sura “The Family of ʿImrān”: “Do not think of those who have been killed in the way of God are dead. Rather, they are alive with their Lord, receiving provision, rejoicing in what God has bestowed upon them of His favor.”336 So he taught you that the bodies of the martyrs will eat with their Lord and receive provision, and that your dead who are on earth will [not] eat and drink in their tombs.

[147] He made it lawful for you in the Qurʾan to wear whatever adornments you would like and eat delicious things. He said in sura “The Heights”: “Say: Who has forbidden God’s adornment which he has produced for his servants and the delicious things of provision?”337 He commanded you to fast a month each year. He permitted for you to eat during [Ramaḍān] from sunset to sunrise. A group of you in the school of al-Aʿmash338 say they think that a fasting person can eat until the imam finishes the morning prayer. If a man were to eat at the morning prayer and at sunset, then what is left for fasting? What does God gain in this worship? However, God commanded the people to fast in order to be rewarded after severe thirst and hunger, in order to perfect the reward and recompense for them. Your companion [Muḥammad] commanded you to have breakfast and dinner while fasting and he assured you about that. He encouraged you to have the evening meal even saying to you: “Eat the evening meal, even if it is a part of a date.”339

[148] Then he commanded you to have sex during fasting and he encouraged you to do that. He said in sura “The Cow”: “It has been permitted for you the night preceding fasting to go to your wives [for sex]. They are clothing for you and you are clothing for them. God knows that you used to deceive yourselves, so He accepted your repentance and forgave you.”340 Then Muḥammad said further: “have sex with them and seek that which God has written for you.”341 And he – Muḥammad – assures and says to make sure not to leave them in the month of Ramaḍān. Then he said to you that in Paradise you will have sex with wide-eyed virgins.342 He mentioned that in sura “Yāʾ Sīn” when he says: “The companions of Paradise, that Day, will be busy in their rejoicing.”343 Al-Ḥasan al-Baṣrī344 was asked and it was said to him: “What makes them busy that day?” He said: “Sexual intercourse.” It was reported from him further that he said: “The length of the clitoris of the virgins is a sizable distance. God lengthened the penis of every one of them on the Day of Resurrection so that its length would be so sizable that he is not able to hold it. Then God would employ seventy Christians and Jews to carry his penis.”345 If its length is sizable, then God should employ the people of his own religion to carry it, since they have more right to be employed than Christians and Jews. Such minds that would accept this are worldly minds. How ridiculous! In which book did he find this, and which prophet before him mentioned that to his community like him! He alleges that he is the best of the prophets so that his works are an example. Which prophet would permit that for his community like him? He alleges that he is the best of the prophets and their most favored.

[149] If we mentioned the works of earlier prophets and the accounts of their struggles in worship and what they required of themselves, including sorrows and hardship in this world, and its delight, then it would take me a long time. It was reported about John the son of Zechariah – and he is the best of the prophets and their own final one – that he did not marry any woman during his life nor did he eat bread and his food was only what came from the earth – not including grass – until he met God.346 He called him “The Child” in the commentary on the Qurʾan. [Muḥammad] did not take even one of those prophets as an example in his actions. Besides that, he commanded you to eat the good things of this world. He commanded [you to eat] breakfast and dinner while fasting and he commanded you to have sex during [Ramaḍān]. He urged you to have sex with your wives during it. Despite that, he considers this month more important than the rest of the months. For he said to you that in it is a night called the “Night of Power”: “It is greater than a thousand months, and the angels and the Spirit were revealed during it.”347 So he should have revered this month by abstaining from sex in it. He should have urged you to exert yourself in worship and he should not have urged you to eat and have sex. He did not revere the month under any circumstances, not in [eating] food nor in drink nor in having sex.  

[150] And he said to you that while you are in the tombs you will eat and in Heaven you will eat and that you will have sex in Paradise. Suppose that when you have sex, you get your wife pregnant and she would give birth. I wish I knew if you could have sex with those virgins in Paradise, but what about your wives who are with you in this world? If they attain Paradise who will have sex with them? But, by my life, the Qurʾan did not explain anything whatsoever about having sex with them in Paradise. It did not say to you that you would have sex with [your wives] and it did not mention that you would only have sex with virgins with dark eyes. If your wives were the ones in Paradise and they did not have someone to have sex with them, then a great pleasure would be taken away from them, since all of the pleasures would be for you in having sex. Because it was reported that he said: “Most endearing to me in your world are three [things]: women, fragrances, and [God] made prayer the apple of my eye.”348 So he listed women first, because for him that was the greatest pleasure. He listed fragrances second, and he placed prayer last among all of these, although for you, prayer is the pillar of the religion. He made it what someone would use to get closer to God. Then shouldn’t he place that above women and fragrances?

[151] And this argument, were I to finish it, would require a number of justifications which would take a long time to explain. Such minds that do not use this common sense are feeble minds. As for me, I would prefer not to mention anything about this ignorance. I don’t want whoever reads this book of mine among our Christian brothers to listen to that. Rather, I have clarified their blindness and their ignorance, and I have made that demonstrable by [the assistance of] God. One verse is contradicted by the hadith and by insight.

[152] He said in “They ask you” in sura “The Heights”: “They ask you about the Hour, when will it arrive? Say: ‘Its knowledge is only with my Lord, none will reveal its time except him’”349 – meaning the time it comes. He also said in sura “Luqmān”: “God has knowledge of the Hour.”350 Then it was reported about [Muḥammad] in the book of Abū Maʿmar351 that he said: “One hundred years from now not a soul will remain upon the surface of the earth.”352 Not one of his companions doubted that the resurrection would be in one hundred years. This is impossible and has no truth to it, because we have passed four hundred years and people increase more than ever.353 This is an inconsistency and a contradiction; one verse contradicted by another verse.

[153] He said in sura “The Light”: “And marry the unmarried among you and the righteous among your male slaves and female slaves. If they are poor, God will enrich them from his favor.”354 He commanded them not to abstain from marriage for fear of poverty. Whoever among them was poor should marry and seek a means of living. He asks God for God to enrich him from his favor. Then he said immediately after this verse – contradicting the first verse – “Let them who do not obtain the means of marriage, abstain from sex until God enriches them from his favor.”355 So he commanded them not to marry while poor. No one should go for it unless he is serious and has the means. How can this prohibition be reconciled with the first recommendation? This is an inconsistency and a contradiction; some verses contradict each other and logical analogy.

[154] [He said] in sura “The Cattle”: “Whoever comes [at the Hour] with a good work, then he will have ten times its like [to his credit].”356 Then he contradicted that in sura “Sheba” when he said: “For them there will be the double reward for what they did, and they will be safe in the upper chambers [of Paradise].”357 How is this remark like the first one? This is a contradiction and an inconsistency; some verses contradict another verse and logical analogy.

[155] He said in sura “The Cow”: “And Abraham instructed his sons and Jacob, [saying]: ‘My sons, God has chosen for you this religion, so do not die except while you are Muslims’.”358 In addition, he said in this sura: “Or were you witnesses when death approached Jacob, when he said to his sons, ‘What will you worship after me?’ They said: ‘We will worship your God and the God of your fathers, Abraham and Ishmael and Isaac – one God. We are Muslims (to him)’.”359 He said in “The Family of ʿImrān”: “Abraham was neither a Jew nor a Christian, but he was a Gentile Muslim. He was not one of the polytheists.”360 He said in sura “The Pilgrimage”: “[It is] the religion of your father, Abraham. He named you ‘Muslims’ before [in former Scriptures].”361 He said in sura “The Table”: “[Remember] when I revealed to the disciples: ‘Believe in me and in my messenger [Jesus]’. They said: ‘We have believed, so bear witness that we are Muslims’.”362 So he taught them that the disciples [of Jesus Christ] were Muslims. In the Qurʾan there are many examples like this so there is no point in repeating all of it. He taught them that all of the prophets and the angels and the messengers [and] whoever came before among the martyrs and righteous and our Lord Christ and the disciples, every one of them was a Muslim.363 Then he contradicted that and he made a liar of himself in his statement when he said in sura “The Cattle”: “Say: I have been commanded to be the first who became Muslim.”364 So he said in the first remark that whoever came before him preceded him into Islam. Yet he said in this place that he was the first to enter Islam. This is a contradiction and an inconsistency.

[156] It should be the case that if the prophets who came before him were Muslims, and then he came later with what they had brought, then he should have followed their methods and their ways. We don’t see him take even one thing as an example which they had done. Moses used to observe the Sabbath, and your companion did not observe it. The Torah forbids the eating of many types of cattle. Your prophet has commanded in the Qurʾan to eat all kinds of creatures and other things. He only forbade for you blood and carrion and pork flesh and whatever is slaughtered without [invoking] God. Didn’t you hear his words in sura “The Cattle”: “Say: I do not find within that which was revealed to me [anything] forbidden to one who would eat it unless it is carrion or blood or pork flesh – it is impure – or it is [slaughtered in] disobedience, without [invoking] God.”365 So this verse permits you to eat all things, except for what the Qurʾan forbids you, such as strangled animals, beaten animals, fallen animals, and animals that died fighting, and what lions eat.

[157] But this is different from what is in the Torah. If Moses came to the people of Israel with Islam, then your prophet should have used the actions of the Muslims who came before him as an example, and permit what they permitted and forbid what they forbade. We don’t see him acting like they did or anything of it. So now, he deviates from all of the prophets, and he brought laws different than theirs, and traditions that did not conform with their traditions. Don’t you hear his statement in sura “The Table”: “To each of you we prescribed a law and a method”?366

[158] So he has now made his statement a lie that all of the prophets [and] the people were Muslims. He claimed about Moses and his people in sura “Jonah” that they were Muslims. He said: “Moses said: ‘My people, if you have believed in God, then rely upon Him, if you would be Muslims’.”367 His statement suggested that Moses’ people were Muslims. Then he contradicted that and he claimed that they were Jews in sura “The Heights.”368 That was when he said: “And Moses chose from his people seventy men for Our appointment. And when the earthquake seized them, he said: ‘My Lord, if You had willed, You could have destroyed them before, as well as me. Would You destroy us for what the foolish among us have done? This is only Your trial by which You send astray whom You will and guide whom You will. You are our Protector, so forgive us and have mercy upon us; You are the best of forgivers. Decree for us in this world what is good and in the Hereafter; indeed, we have turned toward You’,”369 – this means “to become Jews.”370 This is the way that all of the commentators interpreted it: al-Ḥasan al-Baṣrī,371 Muḥammad ibn Sīrīn,372 and Abū al-ʿĀliya al-Riyāḥī,373 and al-Badīʿ ibn al-Yusr,374 and Mujāhid,375 and ʿAṭāʾ ibn Abī Rabāḥ,376 and ʿAṭāʾ ibn al-Khurāsānī,377 and ʿAṭāʾ ibn Yasār.378 So he was inconsistent in his statement about the companions of Moses when he said in one place that they were Muslims, and he said in another place that they were Jews. He said in another place that he was the first to submit to Islam. This is an inconsistency; one verse is contradicted by the hadith and logical analogy.

[159] He said to them in the Qurʾan that God said to him: “Muḥammad, say: ‘I seek refuge in the Lord of daybreak, from the evil of that which he created, and from the evil of darkness when it settles, and from the evil of those who blow in knots’,”379 and they are the sorcerers.380 So he was commanded to seek refuge from sorcerers. Then you reported about him that the Jews did sorcery on him. They put a bewitchment on him at the well of Dhū Arwan, until he saw in a dream [the angels Michael and Gabriel] telling him that he was bewitched and they showed him where his bewitchment was located. So he sent ʿAlī ibn Abī Ṭālib to that well in which the Jews put his bewitchment. So he took an image out of it that looked like Muḥammad pricked full of needles. Every time ʿAlī ibn Abī Ṭālib would take out one of the deeply set needles, Muḥammad found the pain reduced. When ʿAlī ibn Abī Ṭālib finished taking out the needles, Muḥammad stood up as if he had been freed from a deathly illness.381

[160] Then you reported about him that he died while bewitched, or it is said that he was poisoned by a Jewish woman, and that she poisoned him in a vein named the aorta. The poison reached his heart and he died.382 How can it happen as you say, that sorcery would work on God’s messenger? Sorcery is indeed an act of demons and he says in the Qurʾan: “Falsehood cannot approach it, from before it nor from behind it.”383 Adding to that is his statement that God put His hand between his shoulders, yet sorcery, which is the work of demons, would work on him! How can you allege he has God’s protection and His strength? Adding to that is your report that when he awoke or went to bed, he would have seventy kinds of angels with him protecting and guarding him.384 We cannot find all of this truthful; rather, we found the truth of its falsehood. God is more exalted than placing His hand upon something or guarding something or commanding the angels to preserve something, and sorcery, which is the work of demons, would work on it. This is an inconsistency and a contradiction.

292 Q 79:27–30.

293 Q 41:9–11.

294 Q 2:29.

295 Q 50:38.

296 The main point of the argument here is to claim that in some verses the judged will be able to speak and in other passages that they will not be able to speak on Judgment Day. The Latin translation provides several examples prior to the beginning of this section, quoting Q 77:35–36; 39:31, 23:65, and 37:27. Then it joins the Arabic text at this point.

297 Q 7:6.

298 Q 15:92–93.

299 Q 23:101.

300 Q 3:77.

301 There is a large section in the Latin translation (9.4–9.8) that is not in the Arabic manuscript. For this material, see Burman, Religious Polemic, 308–315. To summarize: 9.4: a criticism of fasting during Ramaḍān (Q 5:97); 9.5: a criticism of comparing God to the firmament of the sea (Q 31:31); 9.6: a criticism of the concept that there are hours and day and night in heaven (Q 19:62; 11:107); 9.7: a criticism of the concept that spiritual angels were to worship the physical (and thus inferior) Adam (Q 7:11, 7:37–38); 9.8: a criticism of Muslims for mistakenly believing that Christians worship Mary as part of the Trinity (Q 5:116) and worship their priests and monks as gods (Q 9:31). Given the fact that these passages are found in the Latin translation and also addressed by Riccoldo da Monte di Croce (d. 1320) in his work Contra legem Sarracenorum, these sections were undoubtedly part of the original Arabic text.

302 Q 19:71–72.

303 This hadith seems to echo the punishment threat in Q 9:80 that even if one asks for forgiveness seventy times it will not necessarily be given to them on the Day of Resurrection. While Ibn Rajāʾ seems to quote from a Shīʿī source he was reading, I have not located its origin. A similar Shīʿī hadith notes that even if a man has accomplished the work of seventy prophets, then his work still may not be sufficient to survive judgment because of the severity of what happens on the Day of Resurrection.

304 Q 21:101–102.

305 Iblīs is a name given to the Devil, and is a transliteration from Ethiopic via the Greek diabolos.

306 Q 2:34.

307 Q 18:50.

308 Q 16:90.

309 Q 17:16.

310 Q 7:28.

311 Q 54:1.

312 Abū Qubays is a mountain in Mecca located nearby the Kaʿba and was also said to have been the location for the origin of the Black Stone. The Red Mountain is located on the opposite side, according to Ibn Rajāʾ, who had visited Mecca on pilgrimage.

313 On the moon splitting hadith, see Juynboll, ECH, 483–484. See also al-Bukhārī, Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, 6:327–328 (Book 65, #4864–4868); and Muslim, Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim, 7:201–203 (Book 50, #7071–7079).

314 Q 54:1.

315 On al-Ḥasan ibn Rashīq al-ʿAskarī, see Sezgin, GAS, 201–202.

316 On Abū Bishr Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad ibn Ḥammād al-Dūlābī, see See Sezgin, GAS, 172; EI2, 8:516.

317 On Abū ʿAbd al-Raḥmān al-Shaybānī al-Nasāʾī, see Sezgin, GAS, 167–169. 318 Qutayba ibn Saʿīd al-Shāmī (d. 854) is mentioned as a hadith teacher for al-Nasāʾī; Sezgin, GAS, 167; EI2, 7:691.

319 On Mālik ibn Anas, see Sezgin, GAS, 457–464.

320 Hishām ibn ʿUrwa ibn al-Zubayr (d. 763); Sezgin, GAS, 88–89.

321 ʿUrwa ibn al-Zubayr (d. 712) was Hishām’s father; Sezgin, GAS, 278–279.

322 ʿAbd Allāh ibn al-ʿAbbās (d. 686); EI2, 1:40.

323 Ibn Rajāʾ is certainly quoting a hadith from a written source, but I have not identified its origin.

324 Q 2:28.

325 This passage is an allusion to Psalm 104:29–30.

326 Sufyān al-Thawrī (d. 778); Sezgin, GAS, 518–519; EI2, 9:770.

327 Hishām ibn ʿUrwa ibn al-Zubayr (d. 763); Sezgin, GAS, 88–89.

328 ʿUrwa ibn al-Zubayr (d. 712); Sezgin, GAS, 278–279.

329 These two angels, known as the “Denied” and the “Denier” are tasked with questioning the souls of the departed after death. During this intermediate state between death and the final resurrection and judgment (barzakh), the angels question the dead and the believers are sent to the pleasures of heaven and the unbelievers receive the punishment of hell, as explained by Ibn Rajāʾ. These traditions are found in the hadith collections, such as al-Tirmidhī, Jāmiʿ at-Tirmidhī, 2:443–444 (Book 8, #1071). See also Juynboll, ECH, 459 and “Munkar wa-Nakīr,”EI2, 7:576–577.

330 Q 2:28.

331 Q 44:56.

332 The argument is somewhat different in Ibn Qutayba, Taʾwīl Mushkil al-Qurʾān, 22. In this passage, the critic asks how can he exclude people who died in this world from their stay in Heaven.

333 Q 3:133.

334 Medieval Christians and Muslims both believed in the existence of seven heavens, e.g., Q 41:12. Paul mentions being caught up to the third heaven in 2Corinthians 12:2–4.

335 The word is unclear in the Arabic text but “burned” appears in the Latin translation.

336 Q 3:169–170.

337 Q 7:32.

338 Sulayman ibn Mihrān al-Aʿmash (d. 765); ei2, 1:431.

339 On the origin of this hadith, (“So save yourself from the Fire even with half a date”), see al-Bukhārī, Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, 9:365 (Book 97, #7512); and Juynboll, ECH, 109, 498.

340 Q 2:187.

341 Q 2:187.

342 These wide-eyed virgins of Paradise are the “houris” referenced in Q 44:54, 52:20, 55:72, and 56:22.

343 Q 36:55.

344 On al-Ḥasan al-Baṣrī (d. 728), see Sezgin, GAS, 591–594; EI2 3:247–248.

345 This legend is not found in the canonical editions of the hadith but was most likely the product of an interpretation of Q 2:187 attributed to al-Ḥasan al-Baṣrī. There is little reason to doubt that Ibn Rajāʾ is drawing from an Islamic source as other Christian apologists referenced this report as a carnal description of heaven.

346 The phrase means “until he died.”

347 Q 97:3–4.

348 The hadith is attributed to ʿĀʾisha as: “Most endearing to me in this world are women and perfume, but my solace lies in prayer.” For more on its appearances in Islamic sources, see Juynboll, ECH, 75.

349 Q 7:187.

350 Q 31:34.

351 On Abū ʿUbayda Maʿmar ibn al-Muthannā (d. 824), see EI2, 1:158.

352 For more on this hadith, see Juynboll, ECH, 28; and al-Tirmidhī, Jāmiʿ at-Tirmidhī, 4:299– 300 (Book 31, #2250–2251).

353 According to the Hijra calendar, 400 AH began in August 1009. This reference to four hundred years since the life of Muḥammad therefore suggests that Ibn Rajāʾ composed his work ca. 1009–1012 under the reign of the Fatimid caliph al-Ḥākim (d. 1021).

354 Q 24:32.

355 Q 24:32.

356 Q 6:160.

357 Q 34:37.

358 Q 2:132.

359 Q 2:133.

360 Q 3:67.

361 Q 22:78.

362 Q 5:111.

363 As a response to critiques, medieval Muslims interpreted the Qurʾan to indicate that all pre-Islamic biblical figures were Muslims or righteous Gentiles (ḥunafāʾ).

364 Q 6:14. 365 Q 6:145.

366 Q 5:48.

367 Q 10:84.

368 Q 7.

369 Q 7:155–156.

370 Ibn Rajāʾ contends that the Qurʾan recalls how Moses and the Israelites repented and asked God for forgiveness, and that in this context the Arabic words hudnā ilayka means that they turned to Judaism, and did not become Muslims, as suggested in other passages.

371 Al-Ḥasan al-Baṣrī (d. 728); Sezgin, GAS, 591–594; EI2 3:247–248.

372 Muḥammad ibn Sīrīn (d. 728); Sezgin, gas, 633.

373 Abū al-ʿĀliya al-Riyāḥī (d. 708); Sezgin, GAS, 34; EI2, 1:104.

374 al-Badīʿ ibn al-Yusr (d. 712).

375 Abū al-Ḥajjāj Mujāhid ibn Jabr (d. 722) of Mecca was known for his use of Christian and Jewish sources for his commentary. See Sezgin, GAS, 29.

376 Abū Muḥammad ʿAṭāʾ ibn Abī Rabāḥ (d. ca. 732); Sezgin, GAS, 31; EI2, 1:730.

377 ʿAṭāʾ ibn Abī Muslim al-Khurāsānī (d. ca. 753/7); Sezgin, GAS, 33.

378 ʿAṭāʾ ibn Yasār al-Hilālī (d. 722); EI2, 4:369.

379 Q 113:1–4.

380 The interpretation of these people as sorcerers is confirmed in the commentary tradition such as in the analysis of Q 113:4 by al-Ṭabarī, Tafsīr al-Ṭabarī, 24:749–751.

381 This legend is found in a number of early Muslim commentaries on Q 113 and the hadith collections. See Juynboll, ECH, 198–200. According to Burman, Religious Polemic, 337: “The kernel of the story is that a Jew named Lubīd ibn al-Aʿṣām (or his daughters) once bewitched (saḥara) Muḥammad in a manner very similar to the one described here – including the use of needles and a well – and for this reason God revealed these two sūrahs, the reciting of which cured Muḥammad.”

382 For this account see al-Ṭabarī, The History of al-Ṭabarī, 8:124: “The Messenger of God said during the illness from which he died – the mother of Bishr b. al-Barāʾ had come in to visit him – ‘Umm Bishr, at this very moment I feel my aorta being severed because of the food I ate with your son at Khaybar’. The Muslims believed that in addition to the honor of prophethood that God had granted him the Messenger of God died a martyr.”

383 Q 41:42. Ibn Rajāʾ interprets this passage not in reference to scripture, as it appears, but to Muḥammad – falsehood cannot approach him from the front or back.

384 See Q 8:9: “When you appealed to your Lord for help, He answered you: ‘I will aid you with a thousand angels in a file’.” The canonical hadith and commentaries make the claim he was watched over by an angel in reference to Q 111. They also mention seventy thousand angels watching over the sick due to prayer. See Juynboll, ECH, 55.

Chapter 29475

 [220] On verses contradicting others and the hadith.

[221] He said to them in sura “The Cow”: “They ask you about alcohol and gambling. Say: ‘In them is great sin, yet [some] benefits for the people’.”476 The word “gambling,” in their view, [refers to] “betting.” He said that alcohol is beneficial to people for diseases that afflict them, such as for treatments that they had no choice but to add wine to them. However, what is the point of gambling, that he gave you some license in it? How does gambling benefit bodies for medicine and treatments, such as alcohol’s benefit? This is stupidity and lack of discernment in one who would make gambling’s benefit equivalent to alcohol’s benefit.

[222] He said in sura “The Heights”: “Say: My Lord has indeed forbidden immoralities – what is apparent of them and what is concealed – and sin.”477 He taught them in his statement about alcohol and gambling that they are a sin and sin is forbidden. He said in sura “The Table”: “Rather, alcohol, gambling, [sacrificing on] stone altars, and divining arrows are defilement from Satan’s work, so avoid it.”478 So he taught them in what came prior in this sura that it is forbidden and he commanded them to avoid it.

[223] Then he said to them in sura “The Bees” what contradicts all of this. It is his statement: “And from the fruits of the palm trees and grapevines, you shall take an intoxicant and good provision.”479 So he praised alcohol to them in this sura and presented it as a good thing for them. He commanded them to make use of it because he said “you shall take” and this is a command. After he commanded them, then he said “an intoxicant and good provision.” But this contradicted what preceded about forbidding it for them. He said in sura “The Cattle” what proves to them that it is not forbidden, when he says: “Say: I do not find within that which was revealed to me [anything] forbidden to one who would eat it, unless it is carrion or blood or pork flesh – it is impure – or it is [slaughtered in] disobedience, without [invoking] God.”480 So he taught them that its taste was clearly permissible for the people, except for blood and carrion and pork flesh and whatever was sacrificed to something other than God [i.e., idol sacrifices]. [The term] “tasting,” in their view, includes eating and drinking. So he prohibited it for them in [some] places, and he permitted it for them in [other] places. This is a contradiction and a disagreement with that.

[224] You reported from ʿAbd Allāh ibn Masʿūd that he said: “I was with Muḥammad during some of his travels and the time of prayer came. He commanded me to bring him something to cleanse with. So I said: ‘Is alcohol [acceptable]?’ He replied: ‘Alcohol is good and water is pure’. So he used it to cleanse for prayer. Then I said to him: ‘What do you say about drinking it, God’s Messenger?’ He replied: ‘It is permitted and allowed; there is no problem with it, unless [drinking] leads you to mixing [with women] and reprehensible deeds’.”481

[225] You report from your prophet that he abluted and prayed with it. As for your ignorant ones, if one of them spills wine upon his clothing, it is not permitted for him to pray in it, until he would soak it with water.482 The most ignorant among them are not convinced by that demonstration or examining it in detail. They did not act according to the Qurʾan, nor in taking their prophet as an example in using [alcohol] to cleanse for prayer. Not all Muslims forbid alcohol. But Abū Ḥanīfa – and his name is al-Nuʿmān ibn Thābit483 – and he is the jurist of the Iraqi people, he did not forbid that as long as its drinker did not become drunk from it.484 As for drunkenness, it is forbidden according to him. This ruling is considered trustworthy and closer to hitting the mark than his opponents’ opinion.

[226] Following him about his ruling is Muḥammad ibn al-Ḥasan,485 and Abū Yūsuf al-Qādī,486 and Shurāḥbīl ibn Abī Yaman,487 and Sufyān al-Thawrī,488 and Sufyān ibn ʿUyayna,489 and Yaḥyā ibn Aktham al-Qāḍī,490 and Ḥammād ibn [Abī] Sulaymān,491 and al-Aʿmash,492 and Dāwūd ibn Abī Hind,493 and the rest of the Iraqi people, and whoever agrees with their rulings. It was reported from another source that ʿUmar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb used to drink [alcohol] and he condoned whoever permitted its drinking using the verse which was mentioned in sura “The Bee”494 and the verse which is in sura “The Cattle.”495 The hadith and the previously mentioned [examples] were contradicted by what came after it, which was his statement: “Do not come to prayer when you are drunk until you know what you are saying.”496 This is a contradiction and an inconsistency, a verse is contradicted by logical analogy

475 This chapter is about alcohol and gambling in the Qurʾan and contends that Muslims apply inconsistent legal rulings regarding alcohol consumption. The fact that alcohol was being consumed by Muslims is assumed by Q 4:43 that forbids praying while drunk.

476 Q 2:219.

477 Q 7:33.

478 Q 5:90.

479 Q 16:67.

480 Q 6:145.

481 The source of this account, except for the final statement of permissibility for wine, is found in Ibn Mājah, Sunan Ibn Mâjah, 1:306–307 (Book 1, #384–385). There are other hadith accounts that wine can be mixed with water for ablutions prior to prayer. See for instance the examples in Abū Dāwūd, Sunan Abu Dawud, 1:71–72 (Book 1, Chapter 42 “Wuḍūʾ using al-Nabīdh,” #84, 86).

482 The rule that a Muslim should not pray in clothing that has been dirtied comes from a number of hadith accounts.

483 On Abū Ḥanīfa al-Nuʿmān ibn Thābit (d. 767), the founder of the Ḥanafī school, see Sezgin, GAS, 409–419; EI2, 1:123.

484 According to the Ḥanīfī school, alcohol derived from grapes or dates was forbidden. However, alcohol from other sources such as honey, barley, wheat, or millet would be acceptable since they are not khamr or nabīdh. Even wine (nabīdh) was permitted for medical necessity. Clearly this understanding was exercised at the time at which Ibn Rajāʾ was writing and continues to be a point of dispute even today among Muslims. See “Khamr,” EI2 4:994–996.

485 Muḥammad ibn al-Ḥasan al-Shaybānī (d. 805); Sezgin, GAS, 421–433.

486 Abū Yūsuf al-Qādī (d. 798); Sezgin, GAS, 419–421.

487 Shurāḥbīl ibn Abī Yaman (d. 741); Sezgin, GAS, 279.

488 On Sufyān al-Thawrī, see Sezgin, GAS, 518–519; EI2, 9:770.

489 On Sufyān ibn ʿUyayna, see Sezgin, GAS, 96; EI2, 9:772.

490 On Yaḥyā ibn Aktham al-Qādī (d. 857), see Wafik Nasry,“Abū Qurrah, al-Maʾmūn and Yaḥyā ibn al-Aktham,” Parole de l’Orient 32 (2007): 285–290.

491 Ḥammād ibn Abī Sulaymān (d. 738); Sezgin, GAS, 404–405.

492 Sulaymān ibn Mihrān al-Asadī al-Aʿmash (d. 765); ei2, 1:431. 493 Dāwūd ibn Abī Hind (d. 754/5 or 756/7); EI2, 1:104. 494 Q 16:67.

495 Q 6:145.

496 Q 4:43.

[An Addition]

[251] “Verses contradicted by other verses” was found at the end of that [work].

[252] He said in sura “Mary” – and it [begins] “kāf, haʾ, yāʾ, ʿayn, ṣād” – “When He decrees a matter, He only says to it, ‘Be’, and it is.”514 Then they came up with its opposite; they said: “God has set a seal upon their hearts.”515 In addition: “We have placed over their hearts coverings, lest they understand it.”516 Their claim is that they only worship him and between [this statement and] his setting a seal upon their hearts, there is a great inconsistency. In addition, “They say: God has taken a son. Exalted is He! Rather, to Him belongs whatever is in the Heavens and the earth. All are devoutly obedient to Him.”517 Then they came up with what contradicted that, since they said they strayed from their way: “Perish the man; how unbelieving is he.”518 So where did the straying and the unbelief come from, if all of them were devoutly obedient to Him? Verses are contradicted by other verses.

[253] They said: “And the soul and He who proportioned it, and inspired it to its wickedness and its righteousness,” in sura “The Sun.”519 In addition: “Whoever God guides – he is the guided; and whoever He sends astray – it is those who are the losers.”520 In addition: “Whoever God sends astray – there is no guide for him. And He leaves them in their transgression, wandering blindly.”521 In addition: “He guides whoever He wills and He leads astray whoever He wills.”522 In addition: “And if We had willed, We could have given every soul its guidance, but the word from Me will come into effect, [that]I will surely fill Gehenna with jinn and people all together.”523 So this tells that He is the one who inspired them to wickedness and righteousness, and He is the one who leads them astray and He is the one who guides and that if He [only] wants, then He guides.

[254] Praise is due to Him, glory forever, Amen.

The Exposer’s Book in Truth and its testimony is finished and completed. Many thanks be to God, the possessor of might and power, forever and ever unto the ages of ages. Amen, Amen, Amen.

514 Q 19:35.

515 Q 2:7.

516 Q 18:57.

517 Q 2:116.

518 Q 80:17.

519 Q 91:7–8.

520 Q 7:178. 521 Q 7:186.

522 Q 35:8; however, this citation reverses the phrasing of Q 35:8.

523 Q 32:13.

FURTHER READING

Logical Consistency (no contradictions within the Qur’an).

A LIST OF QURAN CONTRADICTIONS, PT. 2

QURANIC ERRORS AND SHIRK GALORE!

THE CONTRADICTIONS OF SUNN ISLAM’S SAHIH NARRATIONS

The Sirah and Ahadith: The Foundation of the Quran

The Manifold Contradictions of the Quran

A Quran Blunder: The Days and Order of Creation

Allah, Adam, and the Angels

Allah’s Violation of His Own Teachings Pt. 1

Is Satan an angel or a jinn?

Does Allah command to do evil? 

Quran Inconsistency: Does Allah sanction and permit lust or not?

Who Was the First Muslim? 

Will people stay in Hell forever, or not?

Will all Muslims go to Hell?

QURAN ONLY DILEMMA: HOW MANY PATHS TO PARADISE?

To Intercede or Not To Intercede? – That is the Question! 

How the Islamic Doctrine of Intercession undermines Allah’s Omniscience

Abrogated Verses Of the Quran

Abrogation in the Koran

The Problem of Abrogation in the Quran

Abolishing what Satan proposes? — A Fresh Look at the Reason for Abrogation in the Quran

Muhammad and the Splitting of the Moon

A Coptic Convert Exposes Muhammad Pt. 4

I share another installment in this series: A Coptic Convert Exposes Muhammad Pt. 3.

THE CORRUPT QURAN

Ibn Raja shows extraordinary knowledge and mastery of what the Islamic sources claim in respect to the composition, variations and corruption of the Quran I excerpt pp. 153-173 of David Bertaina’s translation of ibn Raja’s work titled Būluṣ ibn Rajāʾ The Fatimid Egyptian Convert Who Shaped Christian Views of Islam. All emphasis is mine.

Chapter 7

[58] Four sections on the meaning of the Qurʾan.128

[59] They narrated in their report about their companion [Muḥammad] that the Qurʾan was revealed in seven letters129 and each one is completely satisfactory.130 He named those seven: Nāfiʿ131 and Abū ʿAmar132 and Ḥamza133 and al-Kisāʾī134 and ʿĀṣim135 and Ibn Kathīr136 and Ibn ʿĀmir.137

[60] So we say to them: Tell us about [Muḥammad’s] words, “Recite the Qurʾan according to seven letters.” What does he mean by it? Does he mean by that to recite the Qurʾan in the languages of those seven [people]? If they say yes, we reply to them: Then those seven [people], did they live with him and recite to him? They say no, they did not live at his time, but they recite according to their teachers successively reaching back to Muḥammad. Then we say to them: Did their teachers, according to whom [the seven] recite, agree on this version that is in your possession today? If they say yes, then they have lied and the proof regarding that is that the first recitation is different than that of the second.

[61] No one memorized the Qurʾan completely in Muḥammad’s time except ʿAbd Allāh ibn Masʿūd138 and Zayd ibn Thābit139 and ʿUmar140 and ʿUthmān ibn ʿAffān.141 They disagreed about ʿAlī ibn Abī Ṭālib, for his companions said he [knew] it completely during [Muḥammad’s] life. ʿĀmir [ibn Sharāḥīl] alShaʿbī142 said: “ʿAlī went to his tomb and he did not [know] the Qurʾan completely.”143

[62] Each one of them whom we have named edited a codex in a way [that] does not resemble any other book. As for ʿAbd Allāh ibn Masʿūd, his codex did not have sura “Praise,”144 and the sura: “Say: I seek protection with the Lord of people,”145 and the sura: “Say: I seek protection with the Lord of dawn.”146 Whoever would add them to the Qurʾan, he would accuse them of error and he would throw dirt on the faces of those who would recite them. He would say to them: “You have made a liar of God’s messenger.” So he differed from all of Muḥammad’s companions on this issue. He thought there should be jihad against them while they saw it fit to kill him. But what prevented them from killing him was that their companion [Muḥammad] said: “Whoever wants to hear the Qurʾan in a pure way just as it was revealed, then he should hear it from Ibn Masʿūd’s mouth.”147 That is what prevented them from killing him.

[63] There were many more things in his codex. All of his companions denied it and rejected its recitation. They even alleged that a camel used to carry his codex. Also, he did not agree with them about the exact words. For instance, [Ibn] Masʿūd would recite, “God took you out from the wombs of your slave girls,” while all of the people recite: “God took you out from the wombs of your mothers.”148 In addition, he recited: “The mountains were like puffed-up wool [ṣūf ],” while all of the people recited: “like puffed-up dyed wool [ʿihn]” – dyed wool is wool.149 And Ibn Masʿūd recited: “She prepared for them citrus fruit,” pronounced without doubling, while all of the people recited “banquet” with doubling.150 And Ibn Masʿūd recited: “Indeed it is up to us to put it together and to recite it [qurʾānahu]. So when you recite it, follow its reading [qirāʾatahu]. Then, its exposition lies with us,” while all of the people recited: “Indeed it is up to us to put it together and to explain it [bayānahu]. So when we recite it, follow its recitation [qurʾānahu]. Then, its exposition lies with us.”151 In addition to these, Ibn Masʿūd was unique in many features [in his codex] that no one follows him on them.

[64] In addition to what has been mentioned, that if he prayed … in bowing and prostrations.152 That was not confirmed from … [evidence showing that] any of his companions did [that], having a unique distinction.

[65] [Ibn Masʿūd] was one of the worst liars among the people, as reported about him when he saw the people of Zutt153 and told them: “Those ones have the most resemblance to those whomI saw with the prophet on the Night of the Jinn.” They said to him: “Didn’t you witness that?” He said: “Nobody witnessed that but me.”154 It was also reported about him that one day he was sitting with many people and they mentioned the Night of the Jinn. So he said: “By God, no one among us witnessed it with the prophet.” They said to him: “Not even you?” He said: “Not even me.”155 So he made himself a liar without knowing it. In addition to that, he corrupted the Qurʾan and he changed it and added to it and he lied about their prophet and all of his companions … testified [to that].

Section [1]

[66] As for Zayd ibn Thābit, he took the book with which Muḥammad would pray the end of the morning prayer, and added it to the Qurʾan. The companions rejected that and said: “You have added to the Qurʾan what should not be in it.” But he responded: “Whoever does not say this has lied about Muḥammad.” Then the hostility between him and Ibn Masʿūd continued until the two of them died, because Ibn Masʿūd did not accept in his codex the recitation of sura “Praise”156 nor sura: “Say: I seek protection with the Lord of people,”157 and the sura: “Say: I seek protection with the Lord of dawn.”158 Zayd ibn Thābit had been reciting them and added the morning prayer canon to his codex. Ibn Masʿūd did not think that was proper. And Zayd’s codex contained: “Indeed the hour is coming. I almost have hidden it from myself. So how can I make you know it?” But all of the people deny that and recited: “Indeed the hour is coming. I almost have hidden it” without anything else.159

Another Section [2]

[67] As for ʿUthmān’s codex, it was reported that when he put it together, he examined it. Then he said: “I saw grammatical mistakes but the Arabs will correct it by practice.” So it was reported from ʿĀʾisha that she said: “ʿUthmān’s codex [contains] many false things.”160

[68] When ʿUthmān’s codex was completed, he said to ʿAbd Allāh ibn Masʿūd: “Burn your codex and recite from my codex.” So he replied to him: “I am not one who would leave the faith and follow unbelief.” So [Ibn Masʿūd] informed him that his codex [contained] unbelief; consequently, [ʿUthmān] commanded [someone] to jump on [Ibn Masʿūd] and he struck him viciously and fractured two ribs. Each one of them continued to disparage the other until the two of them died.

Another Section [3]

[69] It was reported that Abū Bakr used to recite: “The agony of death brings the truth,” while all of the people recite: “The agonies of death bring the truth.”161 And it was reported about ʿUmar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb, that when one was called to prayer on Friday, he used to recite: “Listen to the reminder of God,” while all of the people recited: “Seek the reminder of God.”162 With so many differences, if I were to explain them, then it would take a long time.

[70] So those are the first generation and Muḥammad’s own companions, who recited the Qurʾan after him and to whom he completed it for them in his lifetime. They did not agree on a [single] sura or a recitation. One of their codices was carried by a camel, while the other [codex] without [a camel] and some of them would call others unbelievers until all of them died. The people continued to disagree afterwards about the Qurʾan until the time of Marwān ibn al-Ḥakam.163 Then he produced for them this book which is in their possession today. He forced it upon the people and burned the other books. We will explain that in [another] place, God willing.

Another Section [4]

[71] When the people agreed about this book, the people of Medina happened to have an imam and he was Nāfiʿ ibn Abī Nuʿaym.164 For the parsing,165 he designated this codex and nothing else. The people of Mecca happened to have an imam called Ibn Kathir who differed from Nāfiʿ in the parsing of the Qurʾan. Then the people of Baṣra happened to have another imam called Abū ʿĀmr ibn al-ʿĀlāʾ.166 They disagree about his name. Some people say his name and his nickname are the same and other people say his name is al-ʿAryānī. He disagreed with whoever came before him about the parsing of the Qurʾan.

[72] ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿĀmir167 and ʿĀṣim168 and Ibn Ḥamza and al-Kisāʾī169 could not agree as well about the parsing of the Qurʾan. One would put in the nominative case that which another would put in the accusative, while another would keep it nominative. They did not agree about any of it. What do they want after this disagreement, and what falsehood, after the errors and the grammatical mistakes, have they followed? Indeed, of those seven, each one of them conveyed the Qurʾan according to his own language along with what agreed with the local sedentary Arabs. They knew it according to the language of the one who preceded [him] by articulate Arabs of the pre-Islamic period and their ancient poets. Every one of these seven had many followers to whom they recited in all of these languages. They continued that until other people came after them, and they looked at the well-known Arabic languages which they did not doubt. Those seven above mentioned established them for the people and those who did not know, if it was [not] structurally correct in the language, they would settle it. They would say no recitation or chapter or prayer is acceptable [apart from] it. They selected all of those [matters] on their own.

[73] You should say to them: Tell us now about those seven whom you have followed as an example concerning this recitation. Did your companion [Muḥammad] say to you in the Qurʾan: “You are appointed as successors after me”?170 And that the seven will come at such-and-such time, naming them: Nāfiʿ and Abū ʿAmar and Ḥamza and al-Kisāʾī and ʿĀṣim and Ibn Kathīr and Ibn ʿĀmir, and you should recite the Qurʾan just as they recite it to you? They will say “No.”

[74] We say to them: We have not found the reason he told you that the Qurʾan was revealed in seven letters of reciting. What did he mean by this? Indeed, one group among them says: The meaning of his statement “the seven letters of reciting” means a promise and threat and Paradise and Hell and fear and covetousness and judgment.

[75] So we respond to them: This is nonsense. Because if it were that, likewise it would be said: the Qurʾan was revealed by seven ways or seven versions or seven characteristics or something like that. Rather he said: “Seven letters of reciting” so this distinguishes between this and that. If they agree with this and they do not respond, then they have been rebuked. Why would you corroborate the Qurʾan with those seven, since they did not recite from their companion [Muḥammad] as they were not from his time or even [the time of] his companions? He did not say to you before death that: “After me, there will indeed be seven men who will recite the Qurʾan in their own language.” Rather, they used their own reasoning and they knew it according to the Arabic language and that upon which some grammarians agreed. But whoever uses the grammar would discover many errors in it that disagreed with the grammar. I have already mentioned that in the Book of Amusing Anecdotes of the Commentators from what I knew of it.171

[76] What is the point of following those unbelievers since they differ from their companion [Muḥammad] and his companions? Why did you set them up as leaders to follow them? If you support everyone who recited to them, and you support their recitation as authoritative, then you should have claimed some correct and others wrong. A sound argument is not found among them about that and they only refer to those seven. So we say to them in truth, we need you to show us the way of reciting in which your prophet used to recite it. It should make sense for you to know that and not lose it. For they only refer to those seven, no one else. Now we say to them, your prophet’s statement in the Qurʾan in surat “al-Ḥijr” has been invalidated: “It is we who revealed the reminder and we will indeed be its guardian.”172 So tell us, how did he guard it when those [ones] have changed and altered it?

[Chapter 8]

[77] On what they have lost from the Qurʾan.

[78] They transmitted in their authentic hadith reports that many things were lost that we shall mention, God willing. For instance, in sura “Repentance”173 its beginning was lost, and they did not know it. They wrote it in the codex without: “In the name of God, the Merciful, the Compassionate.” It is the ninth sura in the Qurʾan after sura “Praise.”174 The rest of the Qurʾan, in the beginning of every sura, it is written in the book: “In the name of God, the Merciful, the Compassionate,” except sura “Repentance” alone.

[79] He said that Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad [ibn al-Faraj Abū Bakr al-Qammāḥ]175 reported from Abū Abī Qudayd – Abū al-Qāsim ʿAlī ibn al-Ḥasan ibn Khalaf ibn Qudayd,176 from ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿAbd alḤakam177 from his father, from Mālik ibn Anas,178 tracing the hadith to ʿUmar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb, that he preached to the people at the end of his caliphate. He said: “People, I command you to stone the male and female who commit adultery. For God’s sake, do not forbid that. No one should say we cannot find the stoning verse in the Qurʾan and we cannot find the whipping [verse]. I swear by the one who possesses my soul that it was in the Qurʾan and we recite it on the authority of Muḥammad and it was: ‘The man and woman, as they consummate their lust, stone them absolutely according to God’s word. For God is Almighty and Compassionate’. But they were lost from the Qurʾan.”179

[80] They also narrated in their authentic hadith that sura “Divorce”180 was equal in length to sura “The Cow,”181 two hundred and eighty-five verses and more. Today it is twelve verses, and its remainder is lost. In addition, sura “The Cow”182 was numbered to a thousand verses and today it is two hundred and eighty-five verses and its remainder is lost.183 Indeed, ʿUmar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb spent twelve years before he mastered it. So when he memorized it, he sacrificed a female camel and he gave it charity. Indeed, they narrate about al-Ḥajjāj ibn Yūsuf184 that he added diacritical pointing to eighty-five verses from the Qurʾan and he added to it similar things of different meaning.185 He was also the one who [divided] the Qurʾan into tenths and fifths.

[Chapter 9]

[81] On their agreement regarding Marwān ibn al-Ḥakam’s codex.

[82] They narrated [this hadith] in many ways, so there is no point in repeating [all of] them. Among them is the hadith of Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad,186 from ʿAbd Allāh ibn Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz,187 from Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal,188 [from Sufyān ibn ʿUyayna]189 from Sufyān al-Thawrī,190 from Nāfiʿ ibn ʿUmar,191 that Muḥammad passed away and there was no codex for the people to read. However, every one of them recited the Qurʾan from his memory. So when Abū Bakr came to power, he said to ʿUmar: “I think it is proper that I get the people to agree upon a single codex.” So he replied to him: “Will we do what Muḥammad never did himself?” He said: “There is no way out of this.” ʿUmar said: “I knew after that, that it was the truth, so I said to him, ‘Do what is required of you’.” So he commanded an announcer to tell the people: “Whoever has any of this Qurʾan, bring it to us.” So one of them would bring the Qurʾan written on a rag, and another would bring it written on pottery, and another would bring it written on a palm cup – meaning a leaf – and another would bring it written on leather. And whoever came [with any piece whatsoever], they took it from him, and made it up together into an acceptable codex. ʿAlī ibn Abī Ṭālib and ʿAbd Allāh ibn Masʿūd did not accept that. So each one of them wrote his own codex. They did not make them public for fear of Abū Bakr. And Abū Bakr wrote [supporting] that codex to the rest of the people and the regions. It was recited during Abū Bakr’s lifetime and the lifetime of ʿUmar.192

[83] When ʿUmar was killed, he handed over that codex to Ḥafṣa, while he was crying out in his own blood.193 Ḥafṣa was Muḥammad’s wife, so he said to her: “Keep this codex and do not show it to anyone. Someone told me that ʿAlī ibn Abī Ṭālib and Ibn Masʿūd composed two codices and I am afraid that they will reveal these [codices] after [my death] and make this one invalid. So this one will remain in your possession, and if the people disagree about the Qurʾan, then recite from this codex.” When ʿUmar died and ʿUthmān came to power, he issued a different codex than Abū Bakr’s codex. ʿUthmān did not have the same prestige as ʿUmar, so ʿAlī ibn Abī Ṭālib disclosed the codex to his children and his faction.

[84] ʿAbd Allāh ibn Masʿūd disclosed a codex, and Zayd ibn Thābit also disclosed his codex. The people used to read in all of these codices. They disagreed about the Qurʾan, to the extent that one man would encounter another man and he would say to him: “I do not believe your part of the Qurʾan.” So all of these codices remained publicly different until Marwān ibn al-Ḥakam’s caliphate. He went to Ḥafṣa, the daughter of ʿUmar – Muḥammad’s wife – and he said to her: “The people have disagreed about the Qurʾan just as you know, so hand over the codex to me which ʿUmar the Commander of the Believers handed over to you, so I can induce the people toward it and I will ban everything else.”194 She replied: “My father promised God that I should not hand it over to anyone.” So he did not stop until she handed it over to him, after he promised her that he would return it to her. Then he threw it into the fire along with the codices of ʿUthmān, ʿAlī, Ibn Masʿūd, and Zayd ibn Thābit. He destroyed all of them by fire and produced this codex for the people, which is in their possession until today.195 Thus, those who did this with their Qurʾan – who are viewed among the rest of their opposing groups as a joke and whimsical – are not concerned with [such a corruption], but rather claim that the Torah and the Gospel have been changed in a particular passage, while they say it is true – and testify through it – in another passage! But they do not comprehend or understand.

128 The Latin version has the title: “On the disciples of Muḥammad and the discordant establishment of the [text of the] Qurʾan.” Although there are no direct parallels or evidence of use of the Letter (Risāla) of the Christian polemicist al-Kindī (early 9th c.), he also critiques the compilation of the Qurʾan as well.

129 This phrase refers to the seven styles, or methods of recitation (‘letter’ indicating each particular method) in which the Qurʾan was said to have been revealed.

130 The Islamic interpreter Ibn Mujāhid (d. 936) discussed the historical development of the Qurʾanic text and used these names as authoritative sources for each of his seven readings of the Qurʾan. See Claude Gilliot, “Creation of a Fixed Text,” in The Cambridge Companion to the Qurʾān, ed. Jane Dammen McAuliffe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 41–57, esp. 50–51. On the Islamic justification for seven readings, see Samad, Ibn Qutaybah’s Contribution to Qurʾānic Exegesis, 51–60.

131 Nāfiʿ ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn Abī Naʿīm al-Laythī (d. 785); ei2, 7:878. 132 Abū ʿAmr Zabbān ibn al-ʿAlāʾ (d. 770); EI2, 1:105. 133 Ḥamza ibn Ḥabīb (d. 772); EI2, 3:155. 134 Abū al-Ḥasan ʿAlī ibn Ḥamza al-Kisāʾī (d. 805); EI2, 5:174. 135 ʿĀṣim ibn Abī al-Najjūd (d. 745); EI2, 1:706.

136 Abū Maʿbad ibn Kathīr (d. 738); EI2, 3:817.

137 ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿĀmir (d. 736); EI2, 3:704.

138 ʿAbd Allāh ibn Masʿūd (d. 653); EI2, 3:873.

139 Zayd ibn Thābit (d. ca. 665) was a scribe and compiler for the Qurʾan according to Islamic tradition. He was said to have edited the text after Muḥammad’s death and played an editorial role in its canonization under the first three caliphs.

140 ʿUmar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb (d. 644) was the second caliph after Muḥammad; EI2, 10:818.

141 ʿUthmān ibn ʿAffān (d. 656) was the third caliph and reputed to have proclaimed an official version of the Qurʾan and ordered others destroyed; EI2, 10:946.

142 The Arabic text is probably a corruption of his full name ʿĀmir ibn Sharāḥīl al-Shaʿbī (d. 721 or later), an early narrator of hadith.

143 These figures were important in Islamic accounts concerning the editorial stages of the compilation of the text of the Qurʾan.

144 Here he is referring to Q 1: al-Fātiḥā.

145 Q 114.

146 Q 113.

147 This hadith is found in the Arabic original with English translation in Muḥammad ibn Yazīd ibn Mājah, English Translation of Sunan Ibn Mâjah, 5 vols., ed. Abū Ṭāhir Zubayr ʿAlī Zaʾī (Riyadh: Darussalam, 2007), 1:169 (Book 1, #138). There are several other traditions lauding the readings and codex of Ibn Masʿūd. See for instance al-Bukhārī, Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, 5:70–71 (Book 62, #3758, 3760); and 91 (Book 63, #3806). This hadith is also quoted in al-Kindī; see Tartar, “Dialogue islamo-chrétien sous le calife al-Maʾmūn,” 111.

148 Q 39:6. 149 Q 70:9.

150 Q 12:31.

151 Q 75:17–19.

152 In this section the text has several lacunae. However, Ibn Rajāʾ seems to be arguing that Ibn Masʿūd’s method of praying was not the same as other early Muslims, showing there was no consensus or strong memory about the practices of Muḥammad even in matters that were performed daily such as prayer. Perhaps this is a reference to Ibn Mājah, Sunan Ibn Mâjah, 2:60 (Book 5, #890).

153 The Zutt were a nomadic people of northwestern Indian descent who were settled in the Middle East by the Arabs. In this section, Ibn Rajāʾ is arguing that Ibn Masʿūd is an unreliable and contradictory transmitter of traditions about Muḥammad or verses from the Qurʾan. He cites two traditions related to the Night of the Jinn, one of which indicates that he followed Muḥammad there and witnessed some miraculous events, and another account in which he admits he was not there. Ibn Rajāʾ’s larger point is to illustrate the differences among Muslims in reciting the Qurʾan and recording its content in order to demonstrate its human origins.

154 Ibn Rajāʾ took these contradictory accounts from Ibrāhīm al-Naẓẓām as seen in Ibn Qutayba, Taʾwīl mukhtalaf al-ḥadīth, 27; Ibn Qutayba, Traité des divergences, #37e. For allusions to his presence there, see Abū Dāwūd, Sunan Abu Dawud, 1:47, 71 (Book 1, #39, 84).

155 In this version, Ibn Masʿūd states he was not present at the Night of the Jinn; see Abū Dāwūd, Sunan Abu Dawud, 1:71 (Book 1, #85); and Muslim, Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim, 1:562 (Book 4, #1007).

156 Q 1.

157 Q 114.

158 Q 113.

159 Q 20:15.

160 This passage is in reference to the creation of the alleged ʿUthmānic codex, and the comments Ibn Rajāʾ cites are from the fabrication of hostile legends between the Ahl al-Bayt and the Umayyads.

161 Q 50:19.

162 Q 62:9.

163 On Marwān ibn al-Ḥakam (d. 685), the fourth Umayyad caliph, who led another editorial stage in the formation of the text of the Qurʾan see EI2, 6:621–623.

164 On Nāfiʿ ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn Abī Nuʿaym (Naʿīm) al-Laythī (d. 785), see Sezgin, GAS, 9–10; EI2, 7:878.

165 In this section, Ibn Rajāʾ is using iʿrāb to refer to the case endings and noun declensions in the Arabic and how they are vocalized and inflected in the recitation of the Qurʾan.

166 Abū ʿĀmr ibn al-ʿĀlāʾ (d. 771) was a Basran Qurʾan reciter and known as a transmitter of one the seven different versions of the vocalized text.

167 Abū ʿUmar ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿĀmir (d. 736), EI2, 3:704.

168 ʿĀṣim ibn Abī al-Najjūd (d. 745) transmitted of one of the seven readings of the Qurʾan; EI2, 1:706.

169 On al-Kisāʾī, see EI2, 5:174.

170 This quotation is not in the Qurʾan because the answer to this rhetorical question is no.

171 See Swanson, “Būluṣ ibn Rajāʾ,” 545.

172 Q 15:9.

173 Q 9:1.

174 This is al-Fātiḥa Q 1. Ibn Rajāʾ often denotes sūras by their opening word or phrase.

175 We know that Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad ibn al-Faraj Abū Bakr al-Qammāḥ (fl. 980) and Ibn Qudayd (d. 924) were connected as successive transmitters of Ibn ʿAbd al-Ḥakam’s Futūḥ Miṣr; see Ibn ʿAbd al-Ḥakam, The History of the Conquest of Egypt, North Africa and Spain: Known as the Futūḥ Miṣr of Ibn ʿAbd al-Ḥakam, transl. Charles Torrey (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1922), 10. This passage demonstrates that Ibn Rajāʾ studied with Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad ibn al-Faraj Abū Bakr al-Qammāḥ.

176 ʿAlī ibn al-Ḥasan ibn Khalaf ibn Qudayd (d. 924) was a teacher for the Egyptian historian al-Kindī.

177 ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿAbd al-Ḥakam (d. 871) was a Maliki Egyptian jurist and author of the work Futūḥ Miṣr. See Sezgin, GAS, 355–356; EI2, 3:674.

178 On Mālik ibn Anas, see Sezgin, GAS, 457–464.

179 A close version of this hadith is found in Muslim, Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim, 4:462–463 (Book 29, #4418). This report is also found in Mālik ibn Anas, Al-Muwaṭṭaʾ: The Recension of Yaḥyā b. Yaḥyā al-Laythī (d. 234/848): A Translation of the Royal Moroccan Edition, ed. Mohammad Fadel and Connell Monette (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2019), 712 (Arabic Book 41 Ḥudūd, hadith 1512). This verse is also mentioned by al-Kindī; see Tartar, “Dialogue islamo-chrétien sous le calife al-Maʾmūn,” 115–116.

180 Q 65.

181 Q 2.

182 Q 2.

183 In today’s numbering, Q 2 contains 286 verses.

184 Al-Ḥajjāj ibn Yūsuf al-Thaqafī (d. 714); EI2, 3:39.

185 The Latin translation conflicts with the Arabic here, stating that al-Ḥajjāj ibn Yūsuf “removed/detraxit” 85 verses from the Qurʾan. According to an Islamic hadith report from Ibn Abī Dāwūd (d. 929) in his Kitāb al-Maṣāḥif, he made 11 orthographical changes to the consonantal text. See Omar Hamdan, “The Second Maṣāḥif Project.” The changes are also mentioned in more detail by al-Kindī; see Tartar, “Dialogue islamo-chrétien sous le calife al-Maʾmūn,” 117.

186 I have not identified Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad. Possibilities include the Egyptian Shāfiʿī qāḍī Abū Bakr Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad al-Kinānī (878– 955), known as Ibn al-Ḥaddād (Sezgin, GAS, 497); and the hadith collector Abū al-Ḥusayn Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad (917–1012), known as Ibn Jumayʿ al-Ghassānī, who traveled around Iraq, Syria, Persia, and Egypt (Sezgin, GAS, 220).

187 ʿAbd Allāh ibn Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz al-Baghawī (d. 929) is connected with Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal as one of his transmitters. See Sezgin, GAS, 175.

188 Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal (d. 855) is well-known for his hadith collection known as the Musnad. See Sezgin, GAS, 502–509; EI2, 1:272.

189 The transmission line below and dates to suggest that this name was left out accidentally by the scribal transmitter. Sufyān ibn ʿUyayna (d. 811/814) was a Meccan transmitter of hadith found in all six canonical collections. See Sezgin, GAS, 96; EI2, 9:772.

190 Sufyān al-Thawrī (d. 778); Sezgin, GAS, 518–519; EI2, 9:770.

191 On Nāfiʿ ibn ʿUmar, see EI2, 7:876.

192 This hadith is close to that narrated in al-Bukhārī, Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, 6:424–425 (Book 66, #4986).

193 Presumably, this refers to the moments after he was stabbed and just before his death by assassination.

194 Ḥafṣa died in 665, while Marwān ibn al-Ḥakam was caliph 684–685, so the historical dates of this encounter are problematic in the sources.

195 According to the Islamic sources regarding this story, they explain that Abū Bakr and ʿUmar originally asked Zayd ibn Thābit, a former scribe of Muḥammad, to collate together the verses from believers in the community. After their deaths, this collection passed into the possession of Ḥafṣa bint ʿUmar, daughter of ʿUmar and wife of the deceased Prophet. Later, ʿUthmān consulted this collection as the basis for his codex, which was again edited by Zayd ibn Thābit. Then he had all variant versions of the Qurʾan ordered to be burned. Some scholars are dubious of the double collection legend, regarding the ʿUthmānic codex or later as perhaps the earliest attempt at a collection and canonization of a text. The Ḥafṣa codex story is somewhat different in al-Bukhārī, Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, 6:425–426 (Book 66, #4987). See also Harald Motzki, “Muṣḥaf,” in EQ, 5 vols., ed. Jane Dammen McAuliffe (Leiden: Brill, 2001–2006), 3:463–466; and Marco Schöller, “Post-Enlightenment Academic Study of the Qurʾān,” in EQ, 4:187–208.

It’s time to now proceed to the finale in the series: A Coptic Convert Exposes Muhammad Pt. 5.

FURTHER READING

THE IMPERFECTLY PRESERVED QURAN

Textual Integrity

The Incomplete and Imperfect Quran

The Compilation and Textual Veracity of the Quran 

Challenge to the Muslims Concerning the Quran [Part 1], [Part 2], [Part 3], [Excursus]

The Irreparable Loss of Much of the Quran

The Quran Testifies To Its Own Textual Corruption

The Seven Ahruf and Multiple Qiraat – A Quranic Perspective

ALLAH’S AMAZEMENT AND LAUGHTER

QURANIC VARIANTS AND PREDESTINATION

A QURANIC VARIANT THAT MAKES A DIFFERENCE

THE 1924 ARABIC QURAN: AN UNINSPIRED HUMAN COMPILATION

The Third Caliph’s Abuse of the Quran’s Greatest Compiler

A Coptic Convert Exposes Muhammad Pt. 3 

This is another installment from a series of posts from the Coptic convert Ibn Raja: A Coptic Convert Exposes Muhammad Pt. 2.

In this section I quote what this blessed monk wrote in respect to the manner in which Muhammad allegedly received inspiration. Ibn Raja exposes Muhammad as a charlatan who plagiarized what he had been told by the Jews and Christians that learned from.

The following is taken from, David Bertaina’s book Būluṣ ibn Rajāʾ The Fatimid Egyptian Convert Who Shaped Christian Views of Islam, pp. 147-153. All emphasis is mine.

[Chapter 6]

[50] On Muḥammad’s claim of how the revelation came to him.

[51] He used to sit in the midst of the people with his companions, and someone would ask him a question. Then he would say: “I don’t know, but now Gabriel will come to me with an answer to your question.” So he would contemplate it for an hour. Then when the answer came he would collapse to the ground and his hands and legs would seize. When they saw him like that, they said: “This is Gabriel talking to him,” so his companions would cover him with their clothing. So he would continue in that state until he would lift his head and he would say: “Where is the questioner?” Then he would reply: “Here I am.” So he would say: “Gabriel came to me with an answer to your question and it is such-and-such.”111

[52] Aḥmad112 and al-Ḥusayn told me the truthfulness of that, saying from Yaḥyā113 from Mālik114 from Nāfiʿ115 from Ibn ʿUmar116 who said:I heard ʿĀʾisha117 say: “I asked Muḥammad and I said to him: how does your revelation come?” So he said: “It comes to me like the sound of a bell. If I see it, I have no control collapsing to the ground just as you see, so sweat would drip in the cold and I would drip sweat.”118

[53] If those who have reason and discernment among the People of the Book thought about this conversation, then its flaws and corruption would be obvious to them. Namely, he alleges that he arose and went to the seven Heavens [the distance] between each Heaven being a five-hundred-year march. He alleged that, among the angels, he saw one who was greater than Gabriel. If I were to explain this to the end, I would take a long time.

[54] [Muḥammad] even said: “I saw one of the angels and he was the size of the world thousands of times over. He was sitting upon his knees crying and the tears were flowing from his eyes to his heel like the Euphrates and the Nile. Then he said to me: ‘Muḥammad, ask God to forgive me’. Then I said to him: ‘You are humiliated?’ He said: ‘What can protect me when God your Lord has created Gehenna?’”119 With lies and many alterations there is no point in me repeating it. If every time [Muḥammad] passed by angelic soldiers, he would ask God to forgive them, and he would pray with them two prostrations and pray for them, then how could he be in the Heavens and witnessing these magnificent groups of angels, and God would give him the ability to speak with them and pray with them? Why when he returned to this world – where the people and his companions and those who doubted him and those who required established proofs and belief which he would report to them – would he look to a single angel and then fall down like a crazed person? No reasonable person would believe or accept this.

[55] There’s no disagreement that the prophet Moses spoke orally to his Lord God. God endowed him with power to endure that. [Muḥammad] alleged that he is better than Moses and all creatures. Whoever is in this rank, can he not endure to look at one angel without falling down like a crazed person?

[56] However, the monk Baḥīra120 became associated with him, and he was the first among those who partnered with him. He had knowledge about the reading of the Scriptures so he informed him about that which would be [relevant] for him. He read to him from the earlier Scriptures, then he hoped to take over as leader after him. It is said that he was close to him until the monk Baḥīra died. It is said that he killed him and Phineas121 the Jew on one night. Salmān the Persian122 and ʿAbd Allāh ibn Salām123 the Jew partnered with him and they converted to Islam and they hoped for the same things as the monk Baḥīra, hoping to take over as leader after him. They read to him from the ancient Scriptures so he grasped them and mastered them. He summarized them using the language of the ancient Arabs and the eloquence of the Quraysh and other Arabs. He gathered in [the Qurʾan] stories and legends of the sects of the prophets and others among the ancients.

[57] Then the Quraysh said: “From where did Muḥammad learn about the ancestors’ stories?” Then Abū Jahl ibn Hishām124 and Shayba ibn Rabīʿa125 came to him. They said to him: “Muḥammad, from where did you get this knowledge?” He replied: “God revealed it to me.” So they said to him: “Did not ʿAbd Allāh ibn Salām the Jew and Salmān teach you about all of this?” He replied to them – between them and him – “No.” As they were sitting, he fell on the ground and his companions came to him. Then they covered him up in their clothes. Then he arose and said: “God gave a revelation to me – responding to your words – that Salmān and ʿAbd Allāh ibn Salām are teaching me.” They said: “What did he say to you?” Then he recited to them from sura “The Bee”: “We know for certain that they say: ‘It is only a man [that teaches him]’. The language to which they refer is foreign, while this language is clear Arabic.”126

Then he said to them: “How can Salmān and ʿAbd Allāh ibn Salām offer instruction, when one of them is a Persian and the other one is a Hebrew?” They said to him: “Couldn’t they be talking to you in their language, if they interpret it for you, and then you summarize it in your language?” He did not give an answer, so they departed and left him.127

111 This account is based upon a hadith about the process by which Muḥammad was said to receive his revelation. See al-Bukhārī, Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, 6:377, 401–402 (Book 65, #4929, 4953), and 6:452–453 (Book 66, #5044). The eighth-century Byzantine historian Theophanes was one of the first historians to refer to Muḥammad’s revelations as epileptic fits. See Theophanes, The Chronicle Of Theophanes Confessor: Byzantine And Near Eastern History, ad284–813, eds. Cyril Mango, Roger Scott, and Geoffrey Greatrex (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997), 464.

112 I have not identified Aḥmad. Later in the text Ibn Rajāʾ transmits another hadith via Abū al-ʿAbbās Aḥmad al-Naysabūrī. He also transmits another hadith later via Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad.

113 This reference is most likely the Mālikī jurist Yaḥyā ibn Yaḥyā al-Laythī (d. 848), see EI2, 4:87 and 6:744.

114 On Mālik ibn Anas, see Sezgin, GAS, 457–464. 115 Nāfiʿ ibn ʿUmar (d. 735); EI2, 7:876.

116 ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿUmar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb (d. 693); ei2, 1:53.

117 ʿĀʾisha (d. 678); EI2, 1:307.

118 This comes from a hadith on revelation from al-Bukhārī: Al-Harith bin Hisham asked Allah’s Messenger “O Allah’s Messenger! How is the Divine Revelation revealed to you?” Allah’s Messenger replied, “Sometimes it is (revealed) like the ringing of a bell, this form of Revelation is the hardest of all and then this state passes off after I have grasped what is revealed. Sometimes the angel comes in the form of a man and talks to me and I grasp whatever he says.” ʿAishah added: “Verily I saw the Prophet being inspired (divinely) and (noticed) the sweat dropping from his forehead on a very cold day as the Revelation was over.” See al-Bukhārī, Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, 1:46 (Book 1, #2).

119 This is a summary from numerous hadiths on Muḥammad’s Night Journey, some of which can be found in al-Bukhārī, Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, 4:272–275 (Book 59, #3207); 5:132–136 (Book 63, #3887); and 9:368–372 (Book 97, #7517).

120 According to Arabic Christian traditions, the monk Baḥīra was a source for passages in the Qurʾan. On these accounts in Syriac and Christian Arabic texts, see Roggema, The Legend of Sergius Baḥīra.

121 According to Ibn Isḥāq’s biography of Muḥammad, Phineas (Finḥāṣ) ibn Azūra was a Jewish rabbi who entered a disagreement with Abū Bakr, resulting in the revealing of Q 3:181 to Muḥammad. But this Phineas is an antagonist not a supporter of Muḥammad. I cannot find other traditions about Phineas as a source for material in Islamic literature.

122 Salmān al-Fārisī (d. ca. 657) was a Persian Christian who converted to Islam. According to Islamic tradition, he is mentioned as a teacher of Muḥammad.

123 ʿAbd Allāh ibn Salām (d. ca. 663) was a Jewish rabbi who converted to Islam. See EI2, 1:52.

124 Abū Jahl ʿAmr ibn Hishām (d. 624); EI2, 1:115.

125 Shayba ibn Rabīʿa (d. 624). Both figures were described as Meccan Quraysh opponents of Muḥammad who died at the Battle of Badr.

126 Q 16:103.

127 This is a retelling of Islamic stories regarding the circumstances of the revelation of Q 16:103. See a list in Burman, Religious Polemic, 273, who notes that the two are not usually put together in the Islamic versions.

With the foregoing in view we are now ready to proceed to the next section: A Coptic Convert Exposes Muhammad Pt. 4.

FURTHER READING

Source of Muhammad’s Inspiration – Divine or Demonic?

Revisiting the issue of Muhammad and Epilepsy Pt. 1, Pt. 2, Pt. 3

Sources of the Quran

On The Bible Borrowing Theories Of The Qur’ân: An Authoritative Refutation

Muhammad the Borrower Debate With Saifullah: 12 

Muhammad the Borrower Still! [Part 1], [Part 2]

A Muhammadan Polemicist Disproves the Quran Pt. 1, Pt. 2

Christian Fables That Expose the Fraud of Muhammad

A Coptic Convert Exposes Muhammad Pt. 2

I continue the series that I began here: A Coptic Convert Exposes Muhammad Pt. 1.

In this post I will be citing from David Bertaina’s work Būluṣ ibn Rajāʾ The Fatimid Egyptian Convert Who Shaped Christian Views of Islam, pp. 139-147. Ibn Raja shows that Muhammad was murderous false prophet who imposed his religion by violence and murder. All emphasis will be mine.

[Chapter 4]

[42] On those who converted to Islam for fear of the sword.

[43] Someone told me al-Qasim Muḥammad ibn al-Qurṭī ibn Shaʿbān92 reported from Abū ʿAbd al-Raḥmān Aḥmad ibn Shuʿayb al-Nasāʾī,93 from Mālik [ibn Anas],94 from Ḥamīd al-Ṭawīl95 from Anas ibn Mālik96 that Abū Sufyān Ṣakhr ibn Ḥarb,97 and he was the father of Muʿāwiya ibn Abī Sufyān,98 that when he converted to Islam, his wife Hind came to him (and she was Muʿāwiya’s mother).99 Then she slapped him on the face and she blackened him with soot and she said to him: “Evil old man, you converted to Islam and you left your venerable fathers’ religion.” So he said to her: “Hind, were you not concerned about the sword?”100 This is one of their nobles and their leaders, who only converted to Islam for fear of the sword.

[44] And Al-ʿAbbās ibn ʿAbd al-Muṭṭalib (and he is his uncle), Muḥammad’s uncle in Mecca, was brought as a captive on the day of Mecca’s conquering.101 Then he offered him to convert to Islam. So he said to him: “Convert, my uncle.” He replied: “Or else what, nephew?” He said: “I will kill you, my uncle. What will it be, uncle?” He said: “I will say what you want me to say, not with my heart, for fear of the sword.” He replied to him: “No one knows what is in hearts except God. Come on, uncle, and convert.” So he converted at that moment for fear of the sword.102

[45] ʿAlī ibn Abī Ṭālib brought ʿAmr ibn Maʿd al-Zubaydī103 as a captive to Muḥammad. So he offered him to convert to Islam but he refused. He said to him: “If you do not convert to Islam, I will kill you.” So he replied to him: “You know that I will only convert to Islam for fear of the sword.”

[46] Khāṭib ibn Abī Baltaʿa also converted to Islam for fear of the sword.104 When Muḥammad wanted to conquer Mecca, he decided to come upon them at night so that they would be unaware. So Khāṭib ibn Abī Baltaʿa – this one whom we have already mentioned – wrote a letter to the people of Mecca telling them about Muḥammad coming to them. He handed over the letter to a woman and commanded her to rush to Mecca. So she hid the letter in her braid and she set out for Mecca. Then a scout came and informed Muḥammad about it. He commanded ʿAlī ibn Abī Ṭālib and al-Zubayr ibn al-ʿAwām to search for her. The two of them encountered her in a place said to be the Ṣāj mountain pass. They said to her: “Give us the letter which you have with you.” She replied: “I don’t have a letter.” They said: “Hand over the letter or take off your clothes.” When she saw the seriousness of the matter, she handed the letter over to them from her braid. They brought it to Muḥammad and when he read it he said: “What is this, Khāṭib?” So he bowed his head in shame. ʿUmar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb said: “Will you permit me to cut off this hypocrite’s head? He only converted to Islam for fear of the sword.” But he forgave him and he did not kill him.105

[47] Now one day, which was a Friday, [Thumāma ibn Ashras] saw the people were heading to prayer.106 So he said to his entourage and to those who were present: “Look at these cattle, what did this Arab man Muḥammad do to them?” Some of his companions asked him one day saying to him: “Do you think God will punish us since we are not following this one who claims prophethood without proof or sign?” He replied: “No, by God, he will not punish us, but we cannot say anything.”107

[Chapter 5]

[48] On Musaylima the False Prophet108 and al-ʿAnsī.109

[49] It was in [Muḥammad’s] lifetime that two men claimed prophethood for themselves. One of them was Musaylima the false prophet and the other was al-ʿAnsī. The adherents of the two of them and Muḥammad would make the call to prayer upon platforms in their names. Musaylima’s companions would say in their call to prayer that Musaylima was God’s messenger. Muḥammad’s companions would say he was God’s messenger. Al-ʿAnsī’s companions would say that al-ʿAnsī was God’s messenger. As for al-ʿAnsī, Muḥammad captured him during his lifetime and killed him. Musaylima continued his [prophetic] affair through Muḥammad’s entire life. A large number of the Ḥanīfa tribe listened to him. When Muḥammad died and Abū Bakr took over after him, he killed [Musaylima] at the Battle of al-Yamāma. Musaylima the false prophet used to sit in the midst of his companions and beneath his garments were two pigeons.

He put musk and a lot of camphor in their wings and their feathers. Then he would say to whoever was around him: “These are Gabriel and Michael under my garments, saying peace be upon you,” so they would bow to him. Then he would open his belt and the pigeons would fly away. Then some of that perfume would fall upon the people, so they would try to touch him so they would receive his blessing.110

92 Abū Isḥāq Muḥammad ibn al-Qāsim ibn Shaʿbān (d. 966) was a tenth-century Egyptian Mālikī jurist known as Ibn al-Qurṭī. One of his known works is on the principles of Islamic law.

93 On Abū ʿAbd al-Raḥmān Aḥmad ibn Shuʿayb al-Shaybānī al-Nasāʾī (d. 915), see Sezgin, GAS, 167–169. Al-Nasāʾī spent time in Egypt and is most famous for his collection of hadith known as the Sunan al-Nasāʾī. It has been translated into English as Aḥmad ibn ʿAlī al-Nasāʾī, English Translation of Sunan an-Nasāʾī (Riyadh: Darussalam, 2007). See also Christopher Melchert, “The Life and Works of al-Nasāʾī,” Journal of Semitic Studies 59 (2014): 377–407; reprinted in Christopher Melchert, Hadith, Piety, and Law: Selected Studies (Atlanta: Lockwood Press, 2015), 89–115. 94 Mālik ibn Anas, Sezgin, GAS, 457–464.

95 Ḥamīd al-Ṭawīl (d. ca. 760).

96 Anas ibn Mālik, EI2, 1:482.

97 Abū Sufyān Ṣakhr ibn Ḥarb (d. ca. 652); EI2, 1:151.

98 Muʿāwiya ibn Abī Sufyān (d. 680) was the founder of the Umayyad dynasty in Damascus; see EI2, 7:263.

99 Hind bint ʿUtba was employed in fabricated stories to defame the Umayyads. See El-Cheikh, Women, Islam, and Abbasid Identity, 17–37. 100 I have not been able to identify the source for this narrative but it is likely a product of Islamic anti-Umayyad legends.

101 Other Islamic sources put his capture at the battle of Badr in 624 or Uḥud in 625. On Ḥamza ibn ʿAbd al-Muṭṭalib, who became a faithful Muslim according to Islamic lore, see EI2 3:152–154.

102 This account is a Christian interpretation based upon the story of the conversion of al-Muṭṭalib to Islam. See Burman, Religious Polemic, 265.

103 ʿAmr ibn Maʿd al-Zubaydī (d. 642) was a pre-Islamic leader from Yemen, mentioned in Muḥammad’s biography, who later was part of the Islamic conquest of the Middle East. See Guillaume, ed., The Life of Muhammad, 20.

104 Khāṭib (Ḥāṭib) ibn Abī Baltaʿa is known as an early convert who fought at the Battle of Badr. When he learned of Muḥammad’s planned attack on Mecca, he composed a letter to the Quraysh explaining Muḥammad’s intentions. When his letter with a female messenger was discovered, he explained that he was only trying to ensure that his family would be safe and Muḥammad forgave him. According to Islamic tradition, later he wrote a letter to Egypt that resulted in Mary the Copt coming to Yathrib/Medina as a gift for Muḥammad.

105 This accurate retelling (other than the reference to conversion for fear of the sword) is found in the hadith collection of al-Bukhārī and they were said to be the occasion for the revelation of Q 60:1. See al-Bukhārī, Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, 4:154–155 (Book 56, #3007); 5:191–192 (Book 64, #3983); and 6:344–345 (Book 65, #4890).

106 The manuscript is missing some context. However, this passage is taken from Ibn Qutayba, Taʾwīl mukhtalaf al-ḥadīth, 47–48; Ibn Qutayba, Traité des divergences, #55. Ibn Qutayba criticizes the Abbasid Muʿtazilī court theologian Thumāma ibn Ashras (d. 828), commenting: “Let us move on to Thumāma, who was poorly religious, scorned Islam and mocked it, and made his tongue speak like no man would who knew God and believed in Him. This well-known account is preserved: One Friday, he saw people rushing to the mosque, for fear of missing prayer. He said, ‘Look at those cattle! Look at those donkeys!’ Then he said to one of his colleagues: ‘[Look at] what this Arab [i.e., Muhammad] has done done with [these] men’.”

107 Ibn Rajāʾ is commenting on the fact that Thumāma ibn Ashras was said to have held the position that non-Muslims would not be condemned if they did not explicitly reject the revelation of God. Ibn Qutayba barely considered Thumāma a Muslim, and Ibn Rajāʾ exploits this point for his argument.

108 On Musaylima/Maslama ibn Ḥabīb (d. ca. 633), see EI2, 7:664; and al-Makin, Representing the Enemy: Musaylima in Muslim Literature (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2010).

109 Al-Aswad ibn Kaʿb al-ʿAnsī (d. 632); EI2, 1:728.

110 Ibn Rajāʾ is arguing that the existence of these two pseudo-prophets suggests Muḥammad’s appearance was not unique but part of a prophetic spirit of the place and time, although he does not make this explicit.

We have more from from this blessed Coptic monk in the third part of this series: A Coptic Convert Exposes Muhammad Pt. 3 .

FURTHER READING

What really happened to the Banu Qurayza

“Kill those who Associate Partners (Mushrikun) Wherever You Find Them!”

Muhammad’s Excessive Cruelty

Muhammad and the Meccans: Who Antagonized Whom?

Muhammad the Antagonist Still!

The Byzantine Christians: Antagonists or Antagonized? Pt. 1, Pt. 2, Pt. 3, Addendum

Al Wala’ wa’l Bara’: Islam’s Doctrine of Hate